Multinational Evaluation of the Measurement Invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Comparison of Student and Community Samples Across Seven Countries

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Multinational Evaluation of the Measurement Invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0 : Comparison of Student and Community Samples Across Seven Countries. / Natoli, Adam P.; Bach, Bo; Behn, Alex; Cottin, Marianne; Gritti, Emanuela S.; Hutsebaut, Joost; Lamba, Nishtha; Corff, Yann Le; Zimmermann, Johannes; Lapalme, Mélanie.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 34, No. 12, 15.09.2022, p. 1112-1125.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Natoli, AP, Bach, B, Behn, A, Cottin, M, Gritti, ES, Hutsebaut, J, Lamba, N, Corff, YL, Zimmermann, J & Lapalme, M 2022, 'Multinational Evaluation of the Measurement Invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Comparison of Student and Community Samples Across Seven Countries', Psychological Assessment, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1112-1125. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001176

APA

Natoli, A. P., Bach, B., Behn, A., Cottin, M., Gritti, E. S., Hutsebaut, J., Lamba, N., Corff, Y. L., Zimmermann, J., & Lapalme, M. (2022). Multinational Evaluation of the Measurement Invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Comparison of Student and Community Samples Across Seven Countries. Psychological Assessment, 34(12), 1112-1125. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001176

Vancouver

Natoli AP, Bach B, Behn A, Cottin M, Gritti ES, Hutsebaut J et al. Multinational Evaluation of the Measurement Invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Comparison of Student and Community Samples Across Seven Countries. Psychological Assessment. 2022 Sep 15;34(12):1112-1125. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001176

Author

Natoli, Adam P. ; Bach, Bo ; Behn, Alex ; Cottin, Marianne ; Gritti, Emanuela S. ; Hutsebaut, Joost ; Lamba, Nishtha ; Corff, Yann Le ; Zimmermann, Johannes ; Lapalme, Mélanie. / Multinational Evaluation of the Measurement Invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0 : Comparison of Student and Community Samples Across Seven Countries. In: Psychological Assessment. 2022 ; Vol. 34, No. 12. pp. 1112-1125.

Bibtex

@article{b2c7f9deb81a41108a0ea05ce2e117e7,
title = "Multinational Evaluation of the Measurement Invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Comparison of Student and Community Samples Across Seven Countries",
abstract = "The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fifth Edition{\textquoteright}s (DSM-5) Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) was introduced as a dimensional rating of impairments in self and interpersonal functioning, and the LPFS–Brief Form (LPFS-BF) was the first published corresponding self-report. The updated LPFS-BF 2.0 has been translated into several languages and international research supports many of the instrument{\textquoteright}s psychometric properties; however, its measurement invariance has only been evaluated across a few countries. This study expands previous studies as an introductory step in a global evaluation of the LPFS-BF 2.0s measurement invariance. Archival data (N = 5,618, 57% female) from seven countries (Canada, Chile, Denmark, Germany, Italy, United Arab Emirates, United States of America) were used for this study. Participants were recruited from both community (n = 4,677) and student (n = 941) populations. After confirming adequate model fit separately in the community and student samples, we evaluated a series of increasingly stringent model comparisons to test three aspects of measurement invariance (configural, metric, scalar) and then examined latent mean differences across countries. Full scalar invariance was supported in the community sample and partial scalar invariance was supported in the student sample. Evaluation of latent mean differences revealed multiple significant differences. Overall, the LPFS-BF 2.0 appears to assess self and interpersonal functioning impairment similarly across the included countries. Findings are discussed through the lenses of the cultures from which participants were recruited, as well as in the context of alternative explanations. Limitations, plans for future research, and implications for both research and clinical practice are offered.",
keywords = "Alternative model for personality disorders, Culture, International, Measurement invariance, Personality functioning",
author = "Natoli, {Adam P.} and Bo Bach and Alex Behn and Marianne Cottin and Gritti, {Emanuela S.} and Joost Hutsebaut and Nishtha Lamba and Corff, {Yann Le} and Johannes Zimmermann and M{\'e}lanie Lapalme",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 American Psychological Association",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1037/pas0001176",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1112--1125",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multinational Evaluation of the Measurement Invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0

T2 - Comparison of Student and Community Samples Across Seven Countries

AU - Natoli, Adam P.

AU - Bach, Bo

AU - Behn, Alex

AU - Cottin, Marianne

AU - Gritti, Emanuela S.

AU - Hutsebaut, Joost

AU - Lamba, Nishtha

AU - Corff, Yann Le

AU - Zimmermann, Johannes

AU - Lapalme, Mélanie

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 American Psychological Association

PY - 2022/9/15

Y1 - 2022/9/15

N2 - The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fifth Edition’s (DSM-5) Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) was introduced as a dimensional rating of impairments in self and interpersonal functioning, and the LPFS–Brief Form (LPFS-BF) was the first published corresponding self-report. The updated LPFS-BF 2.0 has been translated into several languages and international research supports many of the instrument’s psychometric properties; however, its measurement invariance has only been evaluated across a few countries. This study expands previous studies as an introductory step in a global evaluation of the LPFS-BF 2.0s measurement invariance. Archival data (N = 5,618, 57% female) from seven countries (Canada, Chile, Denmark, Germany, Italy, United Arab Emirates, United States of America) were used for this study. Participants were recruited from both community (n = 4,677) and student (n = 941) populations. After confirming adequate model fit separately in the community and student samples, we evaluated a series of increasingly stringent model comparisons to test three aspects of measurement invariance (configural, metric, scalar) and then examined latent mean differences across countries. Full scalar invariance was supported in the community sample and partial scalar invariance was supported in the student sample. Evaluation of latent mean differences revealed multiple significant differences. Overall, the LPFS-BF 2.0 appears to assess self and interpersonal functioning impairment similarly across the included countries. Findings are discussed through the lenses of the cultures from which participants were recruited, as well as in the context of alternative explanations. Limitations, plans for future research, and implications for both research and clinical practice are offered.

AB - The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fifth Edition’s (DSM-5) Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) was introduced as a dimensional rating of impairments in self and interpersonal functioning, and the LPFS–Brief Form (LPFS-BF) was the first published corresponding self-report. The updated LPFS-BF 2.0 has been translated into several languages and international research supports many of the instrument’s psychometric properties; however, its measurement invariance has only been evaluated across a few countries. This study expands previous studies as an introductory step in a global evaluation of the LPFS-BF 2.0s measurement invariance. Archival data (N = 5,618, 57% female) from seven countries (Canada, Chile, Denmark, Germany, Italy, United Arab Emirates, United States of America) were used for this study. Participants were recruited from both community (n = 4,677) and student (n = 941) populations. After confirming adequate model fit separately in the community and student samples, we evaluated a series of increasingly stringent model comparisons to test three aspects of measurement invariance (configural, metric, scalar) and then examined latent mean differences across countries. Full scalar invariance was supported in the community sample and partial scalar invariance was supported in the student sample. Evaluation of latent mean differences revealed multiple significant differences. Overall, the LPFS-BF 2.0 appears to assess self and interpersonal functioning impairment similarly across the included countries. Findings are discussed through the lenses of the cultures from which participants were recruited, as well as in the context of alternative explanations. Limitations, plans for future research, and implications for both research and clinical practice are offered.

KW - Alternative model for personality disorders

KW - Culture

KW - International

KW - Measurement invariance

KW - Personality functioning

U2 - 10.1037/pas0001176

DO - 10.1037/pas0001176

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36107669

AN - SCOPUS:85139323413

VL - 34

SP - 1112

EP - 1125

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 365558105