Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair. / Sæter, Ann Hou; Fonnes, Siv; Rosenberg, Jacob; Andresen, Kristoffer.

In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. 2022, No. 6, CD015160, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Sæter, AH, Fonnes, S, Rosenberg, J & Andresen, K 2022, 'Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2022, no. 6, CD015160. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015160

APA

Sæter, A. H., Fonnes, S., Rosenberg, J., & Andresen, K. (2022). Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022(6), [CD015160]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015160

Vancouver

Sæter AH, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J, Andresen K. Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022;2022(6). CD015160. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015160

Author

Sæter, Ann Hou ; Fonnes, Siv ; Rosenberg, Jacob ; Andresen, Kristoffer. / Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair. In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022 ; Vol. 2022, No. 6.

Bibtex

@article{660a5178a78244de88d2a45fce03def9,

title = "Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair",

abstract = "Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. Main objective To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. Secondary objective To assess whether the effects of mesh versus non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair differ according to the degree of contamination.",

author = "S{\ae}ter, {Ann Hou} and Siv Fonnes and Jacob Rosenberg and Kristoffer Andresen",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1002/14651858.CD015160",

language = "English",

volume = "2022",

journal = "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",

issn = "1361-6137",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair

AU - Sæter, Ann Hou

AU - Fonnes, Siv

AU - Rosenberg, Jacob

AU - Andresen, Kristoffer

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. Main objective To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. Secondary objective To assess whether the effects of mesh versus non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair differ according to the degree of contamination.

AB - Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. Main objective To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. Secondary objective To assess whether the effects of mesh versus non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair differ according to the degree of contamination.

U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD015160

DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD015160

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85133196979

VL - 2022

JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

SN - 1361-6137

IS - 6

M1 - CD015160

ER -

ID: 345512386

Forskning