Memory

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Standard

Memory. / Wagoner, Brady Darrah; Glaveanu, Vlad Petre.

Creativity: A New Vocabulary. ed. / Vlad Petre Glåveaunu; Lene Tanggaard; Charlotte Wegener. 2. ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2023. p. 121-130.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Wagoner, BD & Glaveanu, VP 2023, Memory. in VP Glåveaunu, L Tanggaard & C Wegener (eds), Creativity: A New Vocabulary. 2 edn, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41907-2_11

APA

Wagoner, B. D., & Glaveanu, V. P. (2023). Memory. In V. P. Glåveaunu, L. Tanggaard, & C. Wegener (Eds.), Creativity: A New Vocabulary (2 ed., pp. 121-130). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41907-2_11

Vancouver

Wagoner BD, Glaveanu VP. Memory. In Glåveaunu VP, Tanggaard L, Wegener C, editors, Creativity: A New Vocabulary. 2 ed. Palgrave Macmillan. 2023. p. 121-130 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41907-2_11

Author

Wagoner, Brady Darrah ; Glaveanu, Vlad Petre. / Memory. Creativity: A New Vocabulary. editor / Vlad Petre Glåveaunu ; Lene Tanggaard ; Charlotte Wegener. 2. ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2023. pp. 121-130

Bibtex

@inbook{0a79d14b3b5d499982954bdc0d6ceca8,
title = "Memory",
abstract = "When we think of memory, some kind of container for storing things or surface for inscribing information usually comes to mind. It is thought that experiences are put into or written on these surfaces as memories and then taken out when remembered in roughly the same form as they were put in. This conception dates back to Plato, who first described memory as a wax tablet in the mind, on which experiences were inscribed. In Plato{\textquoteright}s time, literacy was becoming a more widespread social practice and the wax tablet was one new technology that helped sustain it. The dominance of literacy since this time has contributed to the persistence of this metaphor of memory (Danziger, 2008), such that, today, we talk of memories metaphorically as being inscribed on a computer hard disk (rather than wax tablet), or inscribed in the brain as an {\textquoteleft}engram{\textquoteright} (literally {\textquoteleft}that which is converted into writing{\textquoteright}). If we follow this metaphor closely, then, creativity and memory have little to say to one another, because memories are understood in terms of their fixity and fidelity to the past, whereas creativity is conceptualised as just the opposite. In fact, only those that are able to {\textquoteleft}forget{\textquoteright} or stand outside tradition are seen to be truly creative, as the solitary genius image has it (Montuori & Purser, 1995).",
author = "Wagoner, {Brady Darrah} and Glaveanu, {Vlad Petre}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-031-41907-2_11",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783031419065",
pages = "121--130",
editor = "Gl{\aa}veaunu, {Vlad Petre} and Lene Tanggaard and Charlotte Wegener",
booktitle = "Creativity",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "2",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Memory

AU - Wagoner, Brady Darrah

AU - Glaveanu, Vlad Petre

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - When we think of memory, some kind of container for storing things or surface for inscribing information usually comes to mind. It is thought that experiences are put into or written on these surfaces as memories and then taken out when remembered in roughly the same form as they were put in. This conception dates back to Plato, who first described memory as a wax tablet in the mind, on which experiences were inscribed. In Plato’s time, literacy was becoming a more widespread social practice and the wax tablet was one new technology that helped sustain it. The dominance of literacy since this time has contributed to the persistence of this metaphor of memory (Danziger, 2008), such that, today, we talk of memories metaphorically as being inscribed on a computer hard disk (rather than wax tablet), or inscribed in the brain as an ‘engram’ (literally ‘that which is converted into writing’). If we follow this metaphor closely, then, creativity and memory have little to say to one another, because memories are understood in terms of their fixity and fidelity to the past, whereas creativity is conceptualised as just the opposite. In fact, only those that are able to ‘forget’ or stand outside tradition are seen to be truly creative, as the solitary genius image has it (Montuori & Purser, 1995).

AB - When we think of memory, some kind of container for storing things or surface for inscribing information usually comes to mind. It is thought that experiences are put into or written on these surfaces as memories and then taken out when remembered in roughly the same form as they were put in. This conception dates back to Plato, who first described memory as a wax tablet in the mind, on which experiences were inscribed. In Plato’s time, literacy was becoming a more widespread social practice and the wax tablet was one new technology that helped sustain it. The dominance of literacy since this time has contributed to the persistence of this metaphor of memory (Danziger, 2008), such that, today, we talk of memories metaphorically as being inscribed on a computer hard disk (rather than wax tablet), or inscribed in the brain as an ‘engram’ (literally ‘that which is converted into writing’). If we follow this metaphor closely, then, creativity and memory have little to say to one another, because memories are understood in terms of their fixity and fidelity to the past, whereas creativity is conceptualised as just the opposite. In fact, only those that are able to ‘forget’ or stand outside tradition are seen to be truly creative, as the solitary genius image has it (Montuori & Purser, 1995).

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-41907-2_11

DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-41907-2_11

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9783031419065

SP - 121

EP - 130

BT - Creativity

A2 - Glåveaunu, Vlad Petre

A2 - Tanggaard, Lene

A2 - Wegener, Charlotte

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

ID: 381235012