TY - JOUR

T1 - Membrane-based liquid-phase microextraction of basic pharmaceuticals

T2 - A study on the optimal extraction window

AU - Schüller, Maria

AU - Tran, Kim Tu Thi

AU - Øiestad, Elisabeth Leere

AU - Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The present paper defines the optimal extraction window (OEW) for three-phase membrane-based liquid-phase microextraction (MP-LPME) in terms of analyte polarity (log P), and anchors this to existing theories for equilibrium partitioning and kinetics. Using deep eutectic solvents (DES) as supported liquid membranes (SLM), we investigated how the OEW was affected by ionic-, hydrogen bond and π-π interactions between the SLM and analyte. Eleven basic model analytes in the range -0.4 < log P < 5.0 were extracted by MB-LPME in a 96-well format. Extraction was performed from 250 µL standard solution in 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) into 50 µL of 10 mM HCl acceptor solution (pH 2.0) with mixtures of coumarin, camphor, DL-menthol, and thymol, with and without the ionic carrier di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (DEHP), as the SLM. The OEW with pure DES was in the range 2 < log P < 5, and low SLM aromaticity was favorable for the extraction of non-polar analytes. Here, extraction recoveries up to 98% were obtained. Upon addition of DEHP to the SLMs, the OEW shifted to the range -0.5 < log P < 2, and a combination of 5% DEHP and moderate aromaticity resulted in extraction recoveries up to 80% for the polar analytes. Extraction with ionic carrier was inefficient for the non-polar analytes, due to excessive trapping in the SLM. The results from our study show that LPME performs optimally in a relatively narrow log P-window of ≈ 2–3 units and that the OEW is primarily affected by ionic carrier and aromaticity.

AB - The present paper defines the optimal extraction window (OEW) for three-phase membrane-based liquid-phase microextraction (MP-LPME) in terms of analyte polarity (log P), and anchors this to existing theories for equilibrium partitioning and kinetics. Using deep eutectic solvents (DES) as supported liquid membranes (SLM), we investigated how the OEW was affected by ionic-, hydrogen bond and π-π interactions between the SLM and analyte. Eleven basic model analytes in the range -0.4 < log P < 5.0 were extracted by MB-LPME in a 96-well format. Extraction was performed from 250 µL standard solution in 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) into 50 µL of 10 mM HCl acceptor solution (pH 2.0) with mixtures of coumarin, camphor, DL-menthol, and thymol, with and without the ionic carrier di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (DEHP), as the SLM. The OEW with pure DES was in the range 2 < log P < 5, and low SLM aromaticity was favorable for the extraction of non-polar analytes. Here, extraction recoveries up to 98% were obtained. Upon addition of DEHP to the SLMs, the OEW shifted to the range -0.5 < log P < 2, and a combination of 5% DEHP and moderate aromaticity resulted in extraction recoveries up to 80% for the polar analytes. Extraction with ionic carrier was inefficient for the non-polar analytes, due to excessive trapping in the SLM. The results from our study show that LPME performs optimally in a relatively narrow log P-window of ≈ 2–3 units and that the OEW is primarily affected by ionic carrier and aromaticity.

KW - Deep eutectic solvents

KW - Hollow fiber

KW - Liquid-phase microextraction

KW - Pharmaceuticals

KW - Sample preparation

U2 - 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462769

DO - 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462769

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34998024

AN - SCOPUS:85123162588

VL - 1664

JO - Journal of Chromatography

JF - Journal of Chromatography

SN - 0301-4770

M1 - 462769

ER -