Medical and nonmedical information during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Medical and nonmedical information during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care. / Wihl, Jessica; Rosell, Linn; Nilbert, Mef; Carlsson, Tobias; Kinhult, Sara; Lindell, Gert.

In: Current Oncology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 02.2021, p. 1008-1016.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Wihl, J, Rosell, L, Nilbert, M, Carlsson, T, Kinhult, S & Lindell, G 2021, 'Medical and nonmedical information during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care', Current Oncology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1008-1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010098

APA

Wihl, J., Rosell, L., Nilbert, M., Carlsson, T., Kinhult, S., & Lindell, G. (2021). Medical and nonmedical information during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care. Current Oncology, 28(1), 1008-1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010098

Vancouver

Wihl J, Rosell L, Nilbert M, Carlsson T, Kinhult S, Lindell G. Medical and nonmedical information during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care. Current Oncology. 2021 Feb;28(1):1008-1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010098

Author

Wihl, Jessica ; Rosell, Linn ; Nilbert, Mef ; Carlsson, Tobias ; Kinhult, Sara ; Lindell, Gert. / Medical and nonmedical information during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care. In: Current Oncology. 2021 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 1008-1016.

Bibtex

@article{b3a9466a6ca84c57a8f17fd00c45868c,
title = "Medical and nonmedical information during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care",
abstract = "Background: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings provide treatment recommendations based on available information and collective decision-making in teams with complementary professions, disciplines and skills. We aimed to map ancillary medical and nonmedical patient information during case presentations and case discussions in MDT meetings in cancer care. Methods: Through a nonparticipant, observational approach, we mapped verbal information on medical, nonmedical and patient-related characteristics and classified these based on content. Data were collected from 336 case discussions in three MDTs for neuro-oncology, sarcoma and hepato-biliary cancer. Results: Information on physical status was presented in 48.2% of the case discussions, psychological status in 8.9% and comorbidity in 48.5% of the cases. Nonmedical factors, such as family relations, occupation, country of origin and abode were referred to in 3.6–7.7% of the cases, and patient preferences were reported in 4.2%. Conclusions: Provision of information on comorbidities in half of the cases and on patient characteristics and treatment preferences in <10% of case discussions suggest a need to define data elements and develop reporting standards to support robust MDT decision-making.",
keywords = "Cancer conference, Comorbidity, Decision-making, Occupation tumor board, Patient-centered",
author = "Jessica Wihl and Linn Rosell and Mef Nilbert and Tobias Carlsson and Sara Kinhult and Gert Lindell",
note = "Funding Information: The study was financially supported by the Swedish Cancer Society and by the Regional Cancer Center South, Region Sk?ne. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.",
year = "2021",
month = feb,
doi = "10.3390/curroncol28010098",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1008--1016",
journal = "Current Oncology",
issn = "1198-0052",
publisher = "Multimed Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical and nonmedical information during multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care

AU - Wihl, Jessica

AU - Rosell, Linn

AU - Nilbert, Mef

AU - Carlsson, Tobias

AU - Kinhult, Sara

AU - Lindell, Gert

N1 - Funding Information: The study was financially supported by the Swedish Cancer Society and by the Regional Cancer Center South, Region Sk?ne. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

PY - 2021/2

Y1 - 2021/2

N2 - Background: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings provide treatment recommendations based on available information and collective decision-making in teams with complementary professions, disciplines and skills. We aimed to map ancillary medical and nonmedical patient information during case presentations and case discussions in MDT meetings in cancer care. Methods: Through a nonparticipant, observational approach, we mapped verbal information on medical, nonmedical and patient-related characteristics and classified these based on content. Data were collected from 336 case discussions in three MDTs for neuro-oncology, sarcoma and hepato-biliary cancer. Results: Information on physical status was presented in 48.2% of the case discussions, psychological status in 8.9% and comorbidity in 48.5% of the cases. Nonmedical factors, such as family relations, occupation, country of origin and abode were referred to in 3.6–7.7% of the cases, and patient preferences were reported in 4.2%. Conclusions: Provision of information on comorbidities in half of the cases and on patient characteristics and treatment preferences in <10% of case discussions suggest a need to define data elements and develop reporting standards to support robust MDT decision-making.

AB - Background: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings provide treatment recommendations based on available information and collective decision-making in teams with complementary professions, disciplines and skills. We aimed to map ancillary medical and nonmedical patient information during case presentations and case discussions in MDT meetings in cancer care. Methods: Through a nonparticipant, observational approach, we mapped verbal information on medical, nonmedical and patient-related characteristics and classified these based on content. Data were collected from 336 case discussions in three MDTs for neuro-oncology, sarcoma and hepato-biliary cancer. Results: Information on physical status was presented in 48.2% of the case discussions, psychological status in 8.9% and comorbidity in 48.5% of the cases. Nonmedical factors, such as family relations, occupation, country of origin and abode were referred to in 3.6–7.7% of the cases, and patient preferences were reported in 4.2%. Conclusions: Provision of information on comorbidities in half of the cases and on patient characteristics and treatment preferences in <10% of case discussions suggest a need to define data elements and develop reporting standards to support robust MDT decision-making.

KW - Cancer conference

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Decision-making

KW - Occupation tumor board

KW - Patient-centered

U2 - 10.3390/curroncol28010098

DO - 10.3390/curroncol28010098

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33672110

AN - SCOPUS:85102465437

VL - 28

SP - 1008

EP - 1016

JO - Current Oncology

JF - Current Oncology

SN - 1198-0052

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 282478478