Mast cell activation test in chlorhexidine allergy: a proof of concept

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Mast cell activation test in chlorhexidine allergy : a proof of concept. / Elst, Jessy; van der Poorten, Marie Line M.; Faber, Margaretha A.; Van Gasse, Athina L.; Garvey, Lene H.; Bridts, Chris H.; De Puysseleyr, Leander P.; Mertens, Christel; Hagendorens, Margo M.; Sabato, Vito; Ebo, Didier G.

In: British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 125, No. 6, 2020, p. 970-975.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Elst, J, van der Poorten, MLM, Faber, MA, Van Gasse, AL, Garvey, LH, Bridts, CH, De Puysseleyr, LP, Mertens, C, Hagendorens, MM, Sabato, V & Ebo, DG 2020, 'Mast cell activation test in chlorhexidine allergy: a proof of concept', British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 970-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.024

APA

Elst, J., van der Poorten, M. L. M., Faber, M. A., Van Gasse, A. L., Garvey, L. H., Bridts, C. H., De Puysseleyr, L. P., Mertens, C., Hagendorens, M. M., Sabato, V., & Ebo, D. G. (2020). Mast cell activation test in chlorhexidine allergy: a proof of concept. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 125(6), 970-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.024

Vancouver

Elst J, van der Poorten MLM, Faber MA, Van Gasse AL, Garvey LH, Bridts CH et al. Mast cell activation test in chlorhexidine allergy: a proof of concept. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020;125(6):970-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.024

Author

Elst, Jessy ; van der Poorten, Marie Line M. ; Faber, Margaretha A. ; Van Gasse, Athina L. ; Garvey, Lene H. ; Bridts, Chris H. ; De Puysseleyr, Leander P. ; Mertens, Christel ; Hagendorens, Margo M. ; Sabato, Vito ; Ebo, Didier G. / Mast cell activation test in chlorhexidine allergy : a proof of concept. In: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020 ; Vol. 125, No. 6. pp. 970-975.

Bibtex

@article{17fa6d90838d4740a7a5e9148be9609b,
title = "Mast cell activation test in chlorhexidine allergy: a proof of concept",
abstract = "Background: Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions are an increasing public health issue and a frequent cause of life-threatening anaphylaxis. Conventional confirmatory testing include skin tests and, for a few drugs, quantification of drug-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies. However, none of these tests are absolutely predictive for the clinical outcome, and can yield false-negative and false-positive results. We performed a proof-of-concept study to assess whether a mast cell activation test could improve diagnosis of IgE-mediated chlorhexidine hypersensitivity, a common cause of perioperative anaphylaxis. Methods: Human mast cells were generated from CD34+ progenitor cells and sensitised with patients' sera to become IgE+ human mast cells (dMCIgE+), and then incubated with chlorhexidine to assess degranulation. We compared the diagnostic performance of this mast cell activation test with serum from patients with and without positive skin test and basophil activation test to chlorhexidine. Results: In dMC sensitised with sera from patients with a positive skin test and basophil activation test to chlorhexidine showed drug-specific and concentration-dependent degranulation upon stimulation with chlorhexidine, determined by surface upregulation of the degranulation marker CD63. In contrast, dMC sensitised with sera from patients with a negative skin test and basophil activation test to chlorhexidine were unresponsive in the mast cell activation test. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the mast cell activation test can be used to diagnose IgE/FcεRI-dependent immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions. It also shows potential to assess the clinical relevance of drug-specific IgE antibodies in their ability to elicit mast cell degranulation, and therefore discriminate between allergy and sensitisation. Extended studies are required to verify whether this technique can be used in other causes of perioperative anaphylaxis.",
keywords = "allergy, anaphylaxis, basophil activation test, CD63, chlorhexidine, flow cytometry, immediate drug hypersensitivity reaction, mast cell activation test",
author = "Jessy Elst and {van der Poorten}, {Marie Line M.} and Faber, {Margaretha A.} and {Van Gasse}, {Athina L.} and Garvey, {Lene H.} and Bridts, {Chris H.} and {De Puysseleyr}, {Leander P.} and Christel Mertens and Hagendorens, {Margo M.} and Vito Sabato and Ebo, {Didier G.}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.024",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "970--975",
journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0007-0912",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mast cell activation test in chlorhexidine allergy

T2 - a proof of concept

AU - Elst, Jessy

AU - van der Poorten, Marie Line M.

AU - Faber, Margaretha A.

AU - Van Gasse, Athina L.

AU - Garvey, Lene H.

AU - Bridts, Chris H.

AU - De Puysseleyr, Leander P.

AU - Mertens, Christel

AU - Hagendorens, Margo M.

AU - Sabato, Vito

AU - Ebo, Didier G.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions are an increasing public health issue and a frequent cause of life-threatening anaphylaxis. Conventional confirmatory testing include skin tests and, for a few drugs, quantification of drug-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies. However, none of these tests are absolutely predictive for the clinical outcome, and can yield false-negative and false-positive results. We performed a proof-of-concept study to assess whether a mast cell activation test could improve diagnosis of IgE-mediated chlorhexidine hypersensitivity, a common cause of perioperative anaphylaxis. Methods: Human mast cells were generated from CD34+ progenitor cells and sensitised with patients' sera to become IgE+ human mast cells (dMCIgE+), and then incubated with chlorhexidine to assess degranulation. We compared the diagnostic performance of this mast cell activation test with serum from patients with and without positive skin test and basophil activation test to chlorhexidine. Results: In dMC sensitised with sera from patients with a positive skin test and basophil activation test to chlorhexidine showed drug-specific and concentration-dependent degranulation upon stimulation with chlorhexidine, determined by surface upregulation of the degranulation marker CD63. In contrast, dMC sensitised with sera from patients with a negative skin test and basophil activation test to chlorhexidine were unresponsive in the mast cell activation test. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the mast cell activation test can be used to diagnose IgE/FcεRI-dependent immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions. It also shows potential to assess the clinical relevance of drug-specific IgE antibodies in their ability to elicit mast cell degranulation, and therefore discriminate between allergy and sensitisation. Extended studies are required to verify whether this technique can be used in other causes of perioperative anaphylaxis.

AB - Background: Immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions are an increasing public health issue and a frequent cause of life-threatening anaphylaxis. Conventional confirmatory testing include skin tests and, for a few drugs, quantification of drug-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies. However, none of these tests are absolutely predictive for the clinical outcome, and can yield false-negative and false-positive results. We performed a proof-of-concept study to assess whether a mast cell activation test could improve diagnosis of IgE-mediated chlorhexidine hypersensitivity, a common cause of perioperative anaphylaxis. Methods: Human mast cells were generated from CD34+ progenitor cells and sensitised with patients' sera to become IgE+ human mast cells (dMCIgE+), and then incubated with chlorhexidine to assess degranulation. We compared the diagnostic performance of this mast cell activation test with serum from patients with and without positive skin test and basophil activation test to chlorhexidine. Results: In dMC sensitised with sera from patients with a positive skin test and basophil activation test to chlorhexidine showed drug-specific and concentration-dependent degranulation upon stimulation with chlorhexidine, determined by surface upregulation of the degranulation marker CD63. In contrast, dMC sensitised with sera from patients with a negative skin test and basophil activation test to chlorhexidine were unresponsive in the mast cell activation test. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the mast cell activation test can be used to diagnose IgE/FcεRI-dependent immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions. It also shows potential to assess the clinical relevance of drug-specific IgE antibodies in their ability to elicit mast cell degranulation, and therefore discriminate between allergy and sensitisation. Extended studies are required to verify whether this technique can be used in other causes of perioperative anaphylaxis.

KW - allergy

KW - anaphylaxis

KW - basophil activation test

KW - CD63

KW - chlorhexidine

KW - flow cytometry

KW - immediate drug hypersensitivity reaction

KW - mast cell activation test

U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.024

DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.024

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32709306

AN - SCOPUS:85088220157

VL - 125

SP - 970

EP - 975

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 251942660