Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders : a systematic review and meta-analysis. / Davey, Emily; Bennett, Sophie D.; Bryant-Waugh, Rachel; Micali, Nadia; Takeda, Andrea; Alexandrou, Alexia; Shafran, Roz.

In: Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 11, No. 1, 56, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Davey, E, Bennett, SD, Bryant-Waugh, R, Micali, N, Takeda, A, Alexandrou, A & Shafran, R 2023, 'Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis', Journal of Eating Disorders, vol. 11, no. 1, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00775-2

APA

Davey, E., Bennett, S. D., Bryant-Waugh, R., Micali, N., Takeda, A., Alexandrou, A., & Shafran, R. (2023). Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Eating Disorders, 11(1), [56]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00775-2

Vancouver

Davey E, Bennett SD, Bryant-Waugh R, Micali N, Takeda A, Alexandrou A et al. Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Eating Disorders. 2023;11(1). 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00775-2

Author

Davey, Emily ; Bennett, Sophie D. ; Bryant-Waugh, Rachel ; Micali, Nadia ; Takeda, Andrea ; Alexandrou, Alexia ; Shafran, Roz. / Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders : a systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Eating Disorders. 2023 ; Vol. 11, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{2c15b3a3c61247eaa37c52f2f53cf09a,
title = "Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: Feeding and eating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Low intensity psychological interventions have the potential to increase such access. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the use of low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders. Studies comparing low intensity psychological interventions against high intensity therapies and non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions were included, as well as those with waiting list control arms. There were three primary outcomes: eating disorder psychopathology, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) severity specifier-related outcomes and rates of remission/recovery. Results: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3665 participants, and 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to high intensity therapies, low intensity psychological interventions were equivalent on reducing eating disorder psychopathology (g = − 0.13), more effective at improving DSM severity specifier-related outcomes (g = − 0.15), but less likely to achieve remission/recovery (risk ratio (RR) = 0.70). Low intensity psychological interventions were superior to non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions and waiting list controls across all three primary outcomes. Conclusion: Overall, findings suggest that low intensity psychological interventions can successfully treat eating disorder symptoms. Few potential moderators had a statistically significant effect on outcome. The number of studies for many comparisons was low and the methodological quality of the studies was poor, therefore results should be interpreted with caution. More research is needed to establish the effectiveness of low intensity psychological interventions for children and young people, as well as for individuals with anorexia nervosa, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, pica and rumination disorder.",
keywords = "Feeding and eating disorders, Low intensity psychological intervention, Meta-analysis, Self-help, Systematic review",
author = "Emily Davey and Bennett, {Sophie D.} and Rachel Bryant-Waugh and Nadia Micali and Andrea Takeda and Alexia Alexandrou and Roz Shafran",
note = "Funding Information: The authors wish to thank Heather Chambers who supported the development of the search strategy. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023, The Author(s).",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1186/s40337-023-00775-2",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Journal of Eating Disorders",
issn = "2050-2974",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders

T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Davey, Emily

AU - Bennett, Sophie D.

AU - Bryant-Waugh, Rachel

AU - Micali, Nadia

AU - Takeda, Andrea

AU - Alexandrou, Alexia

AU - Shafran, Roz

N1 - Funding Information: The authors wish to thank Heather Chambers who supported the development of the search strategy. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: Feeding and eating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Low intensity psychological interventions have the potential to increase such access. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the use of low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders. Studies comparing low intensity psychological interventions against high intensity therapies and non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions were included, as well as those with waiting list control arms. There were three primary outcomes: eating disorder psychopathology, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) severity specifier-related outcomes and rates of remission/recovery. Results: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3665 participants, and 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to high intensity therapies, low intensity psychological interventions were equivalent on reducing eating disorder psychopathology (g = − 0.13), more effective at improving DSM severity specifier-related outcomes (g = − 0.15), but less likely to achieve remission/recovery (risk ratio (RR) = 0.70). Low intensity psychological interventions were superior to non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions and waiting list controls across all three primary outcomes. Conclusion: Overall, findings suggest that low intensity psychological interventions can successfully treat eating disorder symptoms. Few potential moderators had a statistically significant effect on outcome. The number of studies for many comparisons was low and the methodological quality of the studies was poor, therefore results should be interpreted with caution. More research is needed to establish the effectiveness of low intensity psychological interventions for children and young people, as well as for individuals with anorexia nervosa, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, pica and rumination disorder.

AB - Background: Feeding and eating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Low intensity psychological interventions have the potential to increase such access. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the use of low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders. Studies comparing low intensity psychological interventions against high intensity therapies and non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions were included, as well as those with waiting list control arms. There were three primary outcomes: eating disorder psychopathology, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) severity specifier-related outcomes and rates of remission/recovery. Results: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3665 participants, and 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to high intensity therapies, low intensity psychological interventions were equivalent on reducing eating disorder psychopathology (g = − 0.13), more effective at improving DSM severity specifier-related outcomes (g = − 0.15), but less likely to achieve remission/recovery (risk ratio (RR) = 0.70). Low intensity psychological interventions were superior to non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions and waiting list controls across all three primary outcomes. Conclusion: Overall, findings suggest that low intensity psychological interventions can successfully treat eating disorder symptoms. Few potential moderators had a statistically significant effect on outcome. The number of studies for many comparisons was low and the methodological quality of the studies was poor, therefore results should be interpreted with caution. More research is needed to establish the effectiveness of low intensity psychological interventions for children and young people, as well as for individuals with anorexia nervosa, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, pica and rumination disorder.

KW - Feeding and eating disorders

KW - Low intensity psychological intervention

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Self-help

KW - Systematic review

U2 - 10.1186/s40337-023-00775-2

DO - 10.1186/s40337-023-00775-2

M3 - Review

C2 - 37016447

AN - SCOPUS:85152675186

VL - 11

JO - Journal of Eating Disorders

JF - Journal of Eating Disorders

SN - 2050-2974

IS - 1

M1 - 56

ER -

ID: 397247016