Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis : week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. / DISCOVER study team.

In: The Lancet HIV, Vol. 8, No. 7, 07.2021, p. e397-e407.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

DISCOVER study team 2021, 'Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial', The Lancet HIV, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. e397-e407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00071-0

APA

DISCOVER study team (2021). Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet HIV, 8(7), e397-e407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00071-0

Vancouver

DISCOVER study team. Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet HIV. 2021 Jul;8(7):e397-e407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00071-0

Author

DISCOVER study team. / Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis : week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. In: The Lancet HIV. 2021 ; Vol. 8, No. 7. pp. e397-e407.

Bibtex

@article{a133365fdbbd41e1ad26b1908228ca9c,
title = "Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial",
abstract = "Background: In DISCOVER, a multinational, randomised controlled trial, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide compared with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate showed non-inferior efficacy for HIV prevention and improved bone mineral density and renal safety biomarkers at week 48. We report outcomes analysed after all participants had completed 96 weeks of follow-up. Methods: This study is an ongoing, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done at 94 community, public health, and hospital-associated clinics located in Europe and North America. Adult cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men, both with a high risk of acquiring HIV as determined by self-reported sexual behaviour or recent sexually transmitted infections, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (200/25 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group), or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (200/300 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). The primary efficacy outcome was incident HIV infection. Incidence of HIV-1 infection per 100 person-years was assessed when the last participant had completed 96 weeks of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02842086. Findings: Between Sept 13, 2016, and June 30, 2017, 5387 participants were randomly assigned to receive emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (n=2694) or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n=2693), contributing 10 081 person-years of follow-up. At 96 weeks of follow-up, there were eight HIV infections in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (0·16 infections per 100 person-years [95% CI 0·07–0·31]) and 15 in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (0·30 infections per 100 person-years [0·17–0·49]). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide maintained its non-inferiority to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV prevention (IRR 0·54 [95% CI 0·23–1·26]). Approximately 78–82% of participants reported taking study medication more than 95% of the time across all study visits. Rates of sexually transmitted infections remained high and similar across groups (21 cases per 100 person-years for rectal gonorrhoea and 28 cases per 100 person-years for rectal chlamydia). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide continued to show superiority over emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in all but one of the six prespecified bone mineral density and renal biomarkers. There was more weight gain among participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (median weight gain 1·7 kg vs 0·5 kg, p<0·0001). Interpretation: Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide is safe and effective for longer-term pre-exposure prophylaxis in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. Funding: Gilead Sciences.",
author = "Onyema Ogbuagu and Ruane, {Peter J.} and Daniel Podzamczer and Salazar, {Laura C.} and Keith Henry and Asmuth, {David M.} and David Wohl and Richard Gilson and Yongwu Shao and Ramin Ebrahimi and Stephanie Cox and Alexander Kintu and Christoph Carter and Moupali Das and Baeten, {Jared M.} and Brainard, {Diana M.} and Gary Whitlock and Brunetta, {Jason M.} and Gitte Kronborg and Spinner, {Christoph D.} and Andrea Antinori and Vanessa Apea and David Asmuth and Ann Avery and Paul Benson and Colm Bergin and Mezgebe Berhe and Indira Brar and Cynthia Brinson and Jason Brunetta and Jeffrey Burack and Thomas Campbell and Michelle Cespedes and Amanda Clarke and Megan Coleman and Josep Coll and {Crespo Casal}, Manuel and Catherine Creticos and Gordon Crofoot and Frederick Cruickshank and Eric Cua and Eric Daar and {de Wet}, Joseph and Edwin DeJesus and {Del Romero Guerrero}, Jorge and William Dinges and Susanne Doblecki-Lewis and Taylor Donovan and Jan Gerstoft and {DISCOVER study team}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00071-0",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "e397--e407",
journal = "The Lancet HIV",
issn = "2352-3018",
publisher = "TheLancet Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis

T2 - week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

AU - Ogbuagu, Onyema

AU - Ruane, Peter J.

AU - Podzamczer, Daniel

AU - Salazar, Laura C.

AU - Henry, Keith

AU - Asmuth, David M.

AU - Wohl, David

AU - Gilson, Richard

AU - Shao, Yongwu

AU - Ebrahimi, Ramin

AU - Cox, Stephanie

AU - Kintu, Alexander

AU - Carter, Christoph

AU - Das, Moupali

AU - Baeten, Jared M.

AU - Brainard, Diana M.

AU - Whitlock, Gary

AU - Brunetta, Jason M.

AU - Kronborg, Gitte

AU - Spinner, Christoph D.

AU - Antinori, Andrea

AU - Apea, Vanessa

AU - Asmuth, David

AU - Avery, Ann

AU - Benson, Paul

AU - Bergin, Colm

AU - Berhe, Mezgebe

AU - Brar, Indira

AU - Brinson, Cynthia

AU - Brunetta, Jason

AU - Burack, Jeffrey

AU - Campbell, Thomas

AU - Cespedes, Michelle

AU - Clarke, Amanda

AU - Coleman, Megan

AU - Coll, Josep

AU - Crespo Casal, Manuel

AU - Creticos, Catherine

AU - Crofoot, Gordon

AU - Cruickshank, Frederick

AU - Cua, Eric

AU - Daar, Eric

AU - de Wet, Joseph

AU - DeJesus, Edwin

AU - Del Romero Guerrero, Jorge

AU - Dinges, William

AU - Doblecki-Lewis, Susanne

AU - Donovan, Taylor

AU - Gerstoft, Jan

AU - DISCOVER study team

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - Background: In DISCOVER, a multinational, randomised controlled trial, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide compared with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate showed non-inferior efficacy for HIV prevention and improved bone mineral density and renal safety biomarkers at week 48. We report outcomes analysed after all participants had completed 96 weeks of follow-up. Methods: This study is an ongoing, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done at 94 community, public health, and hospital-associated clinics located in Europe and North America. Adult cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men, both with a high risk of acquiring HIV as determined by self-reported sexual behaviour or recent sexually transmitted infections, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (200/25 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group), or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (200/300 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). The primary efficacy outcome was incident HIV infection. Incidence of HIV-1 infection per 100 person-years was assessed when the last participant had completed 96 weeks of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02842086. Findings: Between Sept 13, 2016, and June 30, 2017, 5387 participants were randomly assigned to receive emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (n=2694) or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n=2693), contributing 10 081 person-years of follow-up. At 96 weeks of follow-up, there were eight HIV infections in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (0·16 infections per 100 person-years [95% CI 0·07–0·31]) and 15 in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (0·30 infections per 100 person-years [0·17–0·49]). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide maintained its non-inferiority to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV prevention (IRR 0·54 [95% CI 0·23–1·26]). Approximately 78–82% of participants reported taking study medication more than 95% of the time across all study visits. Rates of sexually transmitted infections remained high and similar across groups (21 cases per 100 person-years for rectal gonorrhoea and 28 cases per 100 person-years for rectal chlamydia). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide continued to show superiority over emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in all but one of the six prespecified bone mineral density and renal biomarkers. There was more weight gain among participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (median weight gain 1·7 kg vs 0·5 kg, p<0·0001). Interpretation: Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide is safe and effective for longer-term pre-exposure prophylaxis in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. Funding: Gilead Sciences.

AB - Background: In DISCOVER, a multinational, randomised controlled trial, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide compared with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate showed non-inferior efficacy for HIV prevention and improved bone mineral density and renal safety biomarkers at week 48. We report outcomes analysed after all participants had completed 96 weeks of follow-up. Methods: This study is an ongoing, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done at 94 community, public health, and hospital-associated clinics located in Europe and North America. Adult cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men, both with a high risk of acquiring HIV as determined by self-reported sexual behaviour or recent sexually transmitted infections, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (200/25 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group), or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (200/300 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). The primary efficacy outcome was incident HIV infection. Incidence of HIV-1 infection per 100 person-years was assessed when the last participant had completed 96 weeks of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02842086. Findings: Between Sept 13, 2016, and June 30, 2017, 5387 participants were randomly assigned to receive emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (n=2694) or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n=2693), contributing 10 081 person-years of follow-up. At 96 weeks of follow-up, there were eight HIV infections in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (0·16 infections per 100 person-years [95% CI 0·07–0·31]) and 15 in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (0·30 infections per 100 person-years [0·17–0·49]). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide maintained its non-inferiority to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV prevention (IRR 0·54 [95% CI 0·23–1·26]). Approximately 78–82% of participants reported taking study medication more than 95% of the time across all study visits. Rates of sexually transmitted infections remained high and similar across groups (21 cases per 100 person-years for rectal gonorrhoea and 28 cases per 100 person-years for rectal chlamydia). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide continued to show superiority over emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in all but one of the six prespecified bone mineral density and renal biomarkers. There was more weight gain among participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (median weight gain 1·7 kg vs 0·5 kg, p<0·0001). Interpretation: Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide is safe and effective for longer-term pre-exposure prophylaxis in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. Funding: Gilead Sciences.

U2 - 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00071-0

DO - 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00071-0

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34197772

AN - SCOPUS:85108831214

VL - 8

SP - e397-e407

JO - The Lancet HIV

JF - The Lancet HIV

SN - 2352-3018

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 285950946