Letter the editor

Letter the editor: serious methodological concerns about a recently published meta-analysis on oxygen therapy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

Standard

Letter the editor : serious methodological concerns about a recently published meta-analysis on oxygen therapy. / Klitgaard, Thomas Lass; Schjørring, Olav Lilleholt; Nielsen, Frederik Mølgaard; Meyhoff, Christian Sylvest; Barbateskovic, Marija; Wetterslev, Jørn; Perner, Anders; Rasmussen, Bodil Steen.

In: Journal of Intensive Care, Vol. 9, No. 1, 72, 2021.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Klitgaard, TL, Schjørring, OL, Nielsen, FM, Meyhoff, CS, Barbateskovic, M, Wetterslev, J, Perner, A & Rasmussen, BS 2021, 'Letter the editor: serious methodological concerns about a recently published meta-analysis on oxygen therapy', Journal of Intensive Care, vol. 9, no. 1, 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00573-5

APA

Klitgaard, T. L., Schjørring, O. L., Nielsen, F. M., Meyhoff, C. S., Barbateskovic, M., Wetterslev, J., Perner, A., & Rasmussen, B. S. (2021). Letter the editor: serious methodological concerns about a recently published meta-analysis on oxygen therapy. Journal of Intensive Care, 9(1), [72]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00573-5

Vancouver

Klitgaard TL, Schjørring OL, Nielsen FM, Meyhoff CS, Barbateskovic M, Wetterslev J et al. Letter the editor: serious methodological concerns about a recently published meta-analysis on oxygen therapy. Journal of Intensive Care. 2021;9(1). 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00573-5

Author

Klitgaard, Thomas Lass ; Schjørring, Olav Lilleholt ; Nielsen, Frederik Mølgaard ; Meyhoff, Christian Sylvest ; Barbateskovic, Marija ; Wetterslev, Jørn ; Perner, Anders ; Rasmussen, Bodil Steen. / Letter the editor : serious methodological concerns about a recently published meta-analysis on oxygen therapy. In: Journal of Intensive Care. 2021 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{7af385df3204429b959ae1e70ad83f7e,

title = "Letter the editor: serious methodological concerns about a recently published meta-analysis on oxygen therapy",

abstract = "In a recent paper, Chen et al. report the findings of a systematic review with meta-analysis concerning conservative versus conventional oxygen therapy for critically ill patients. We wish to commend the authors for their interest in the matter. However, the authors appear to misquote findings, fail to report results for all specified analyses, do not identify all relevant trials, have post hoc changed the eligibility criteria, and have seemingly switched directions of effects in analyses of secondary outcomes. These issues have led to incorrect conclusions concerning the effects of targeted oxygen therapy in critically ill patients.",

keywords = "Critical care, Meta-analysis, Oxygen, Systematic review",

author = "Klitgaard, {Thomas Lass} and Schj{\o}rring, {Olav Lilleholt} and Nielsen, {Frederik M{\o}lgaard} and Meyhoff, {Christian Sylvest} and Marija Barbateskovic and J{\o}rn Wetterslev and Anders Perner and Rasmussen, {Bodil Steen}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1186/s40560-021-00573-5",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

journal = "Journal of Intensive Care",

issn = "2052-0492",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Letter the editor

T2 - serious methodological concerns about a recently published meta-analysis on oxygen therapy

AU - Klitgaard, Thomas Lass

AU - Schjørring, Olav Lilleholt

AU - Nielsen, Frederik Mølgaard

AU - Meyhoff, Christian Sylvest

AU - Barbateskovic, Marija

AU - Wetterslev, Jørn

AU - Perner, Anders

AU - Rasmussen, Bodil Steen

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - In a recent paper, Chen et al. report the findings of a systematic review with meta-analysis concerning conservative versus conventional oxygen therapy for critically ill patients. We wish to commend the authors for their interest in the matter. However, the authors appear to misquote findings, fail to report results for all specified analyses, do not identify all relevant trials, have post hoc changed the eligibility criteria, and have seemingly switched directions of effects in analyses of secondary outcomes. These issues have led to incorrect conclusions concerning the effects of targeted oxygen therapy in critically ill patients.

AB - In a recent paper, Chen et al. report the findings of a systematic review with meta-analysis concerning conservative versus conventional oxygen therapy for critically ill patients. We wish to commend the authors for their interest in the matter. However, the authors appear to misquote findings, fail to report results for all specified analyses, do not identify all relevant trials, have post hoc changed the eligibility criteria, and have seemingly switched directions of effects in analyses of secondary outcomes. These issues have led to incorrect conclusions concerning the effects of targeted oxygen therapy in critically ill patients.

KW - Critical care

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Oxygen

KW - Systematic review

U2 - 10.1186/s40560-021-00573-5

DO - 10.1186/s40560-021-00573-5

M3 - Letter

C2 - 34876227

AN - SCOPUS:85120855626

VL - 9

JO - Journal of Intensive Care

JF - Journal of Intensive Care

SN - 2052-0492

IS - 1

M1 - 72

ER -

ID: 301343815

Forskning