Lead us (not) into temptation: Testing the motivational mechanisms linking Honesty-Humility to cooperation
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Lead us (not) into temptation : Testing the motivational mechanisms linking Honesty-Humility to cooperation. / Hilbig, Benjamin E.; Kieslich, P; Henninger, F.; Thielmann, Isabel; Zettler, Ingo.
In: European Journal of Personality, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 116-127.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Lead us (not) into temptation
T2 - Testing the motivational mechanisms linking Honesty-Humility to cooperation
AU - Hilbig, Benjamin E.
AU - Kieslich, P
AU - Henninger, F.
AU - Thielmann, Isabel
AU - Zettler, Ingo
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - Over the past decades, there has been considerable interest in individual differences in cooperative behaviour and how these can be explained. Whereas the Honesty–Humility dimension from the HEXACO model of personality has been identified as a consistent predictor of cooperation, the underlying motivational mechanisms of this association have remained unclear—especially given the confound between the temptation to exploit others and the fear of being exploited as motivational drivers of defection in social dilemmas. In a reanalysis and a new experiment, we tease apart these mechanisms by manipulating the rank order of pay‐offs in a symmetric two‐person game paradigm, essentially implementing the classic prisoner's dilemma, stag hunt, and chicken games. Results revealed that Honesty–Humility predicted cooperation specifically in the games in which temptation was a potential motivator of defection, whereas it did not account for cooperation in those games in which only fear implied defection. Our findings thereby shed light on the underlying motivational mechanisms of the Honesty–Humility–cooperation link and, more generally, demonstrate how economic games can be used to disentangle such mechanisms.
AB - Over the past decades, there has been considerable interest in individual differences in cooperative behaviour and how these can be explained. Whereas the Honesty–Humility dimension from the HEXACO model of personality has been identified as a consistent predictor of cooperation, the underlying motivational mechanisms of this association have remained unclear—especially given the confound between the temptation to exploit others and the fear of being exploited as motivational drivers of defection in social dilemmas. In a reanalysis and a new experiment, we tease apart these mechanisms by manipulating the rank order of pay‐offs in a symmetric two‐person game paradigm, essentially implementing the classic prisoner's dilemma, stag hunt, and chicken games. Results revealed that Honesty–Humility predicted cooperation specifically in the games in which temptation was a potential motivator of defection, whereas it did not account for cooperation in those games in which only fear implied defection. Our findings thereby shed light on the underlying motivational mechanisms of the Honesty–Humility–cooperation link and, more generally, demonstrate how economic games can be used to disentangle such mechanisms.
KW - cooperation
KW - HEXACO
KW - Honesty-Humility
KW - motivation
KW - social dilemmas
U2 - 10.1002/per.2149
DO - 10.1002/per.2149
M3 - Journal article
VL - 32
SP - 116
EP - 127
JO - European Journal of Personality
JF - European Journal of Personality
SN - 0890-2070
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 192456211