Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children : a systematic review and meta-analysis. / Olesen, Christoffer Skov; Andresen, Kristoffer; Öberg, Stina; Rosenberg, Jacob.

In: Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 33, No. 7, 2019, p. 2050-2060.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Olesen, CS, Andresen, K, Öberg, S & Rosenberg, J 2019, 'Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis', Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 2050-2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06740-y

APA

Olesen, C. S., Andresen, K., Öberg, S., & Rosenberg, J. (2019). Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 33(7), 2050-2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06740-y

Vancouver

Olesen CS, Andresen K, Öberg S, Rosenberg J. Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 2019;33(7):2050-2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06740-y

Author

Olesen, Christoffer Skov ; Andresen, Kristoffer ; Öberg, Stina ; Rosenberg, Jacob. / Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children : a systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Surgical Endoscopy. 2019 ; Vol. 33, No. 7. pp. 2050-2060.

Bibtex

@article{de21966ef46740b1ace39bd5b09ef243,
title = "Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Regarding groin hernia repair in children, guidelines do not favor open or laparoscopic repair. Even so, most surgeons prefer an open technique. The aim of this systematic review was to compare short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open groin hernia repair in children.METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in three databases, and all randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open groin hernia repair in children under 18 years were included. Outcomes were postoperative complications, intraoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, time to recovery, and wound appearance. The outcomes were compared between open and laparoscopic repairs in meta-analyses.RESULTS: We included ten studies with 1270 patients involving 1392 hernias. We found no differences in recurrence rate, testicular atrophy, hydrocele, hematoma, seroma, infection, pain, length of hospital stay, or time to full recovery. Laparoscopic repair was superior regarding wound appearance. Laparoscopic repair had shorter operative time than open repair for bilateral groin hernias. For unilateral groin hernias, extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair was faster than open repair, but open repair was faster than intraperitoneal laparoscopic repair.CONCLUSION: Our results indicate similar outcome after laparoscopic and open techniques for groin hernia repair in children. The surgeon's preference as well as the wishes of the patient and parents should therefore determine the surgical approach.",
author = "Olesen, {Christoffer Skov} and Kristoffer Andresen and Stina {\"O}berg and Jacob Rosenberg",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-019-06740-y",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "2050--2060",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children

T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Olesen, Christoffer Skov

AU - Andresen, Kristoffer

AU - Öberg, Stina

AU - Rosenberg, Jacob

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - BACKGROUND: Regarding groin hernia repair in children, guidelines do not favor open or laparoscopic repair. Even so, most surgeons prefer an open technique. The aim of this systematic review was to compare short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open groin hernia repair in children.METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in three databases, and all randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open groin hernia repair in children under 18 years were included. Outcomes were postoperative complications, intraoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, time to recovery, and wound appearance. The outcomes were compared between open and laparoscopic repairs in meta-analyses.RESULTS: We included ten studies with 1270 patients involving 1392 hernias. We found no differences in recurrence rate, testicular atrophy, hydrocele, hematoma, seroma, infection, pain, length of hospital stay, or time to full recovery. Laparoscopic repair was superior regarding wound appearance. Laparoscopic repair had shorter operative time than open repair for bilateral groin hernias. For unilateral groin hernias, extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair was faster than open repair, but open repair was faster than intraperitoneal laparoscopic repair.CONCLUSION: Our results indicate similar outcome after laparoscopic and open techniques for groin hernia repair in children. The surgeon's preference as well as the wishes of the patient and parents should therefore determine the surgical approach.

AB - BACKGROUND: Regarding groin hernia repair in children, guidelines do not favor open or laparoscopic repair. Even so, most surgeons prefer an open technique. The aim of this systematic review was to compare short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open groin hernia repair in children.METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in three databases, and all randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open groin hernia repair in children under 18 years were included. Outcomes were postoperative complications, intraoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, time to recovery, and wound appearance. The outcomes were compared between open and laparoscopic repairs in meta-analyses.RESULTS: We included ten studies with 1270 patients involving 1392 hernias. We found no differences in recurrence rate, testicular atrophy, hydrocele, hematoma, seroma, infection, pain, length of hospital stay, or time to full recovery. Laparoscopic repair was superior regarding wound appearance. Laparoscopic repair had shorter operative time than open repair for bilateral groin hernias. For unilateral groin hernias, extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair was faster than open repair, but open repair was faster than intraperitoneal laparoscopic repair.CONCLUSION: Our results indicate similar outcome after laparoscopic and open techniques for groin hernia repair in children. The surgeon's preference as well as the wishes of the patient and parents should therefore determine the surgical approach.

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-019-06740-y

DO - 10.1007/s00464-019-06740-y

M3 - Review

C2 - 30868322

VL - 33

SP - 2050

EP - 2060

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 225000220