Inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using digital subtraction angiography tumor blush
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using digital subtraction angiography tumor blush. / Clausen, Caroline; Dahl, Benny; Frevert, Susanne Christiansen; Forman, Julie Lyng; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann; Lönn, Lars.
In: Acta Radiologica, Vol. 58, No. 6, 06.2017, p. 734-739.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using digital subtraction angiography tumor blush
AU - Clausen, Caroline
AU - Dahl, Benny
AU - Frevert, Susanne Christiansen
AU - Forman, Julie Lyng
AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
AU - Lönn, Lars
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Background: Preoperative embolization is based on the preoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) tumor blush, and as such is considered the “gold standard” for determining tumor vascularity. However, to our knowledge reliability studies evaluating vascularity ratings of DSA tumor blush in spinal metastases have not been published previously.Purpose:To evaluate inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using DSA tumor blush.Material and Methods:This reliability study included 46 patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression requiring surgery. DSA data stored in the hospital picture archiving and communication system (PACS) from the participants of a randomized controlled trial were used. Inter- and intra-rater agreement on vascularity assessment using DSA tumor blush according to a three-step ordinal scale was evaluated: no hypervascularity; moderate hypervascularity; and pronounced hypervascularity. The statistical analysis was based on the linear weighted kappa’s for multiple raters that extend Cohen’s κ. Three raters and κ = 0.2 in the null hypothesis implied that the power of the study was 0.96.Results:Inter- and intra-rater agreements were moderate in rating the vascularity of spinal metastases and the agreements were significantly higher than the κ = 0.20 in the null hypothesis (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0001). The κ value for inter-rater agreement was 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–0.72) and for intra-rater agreement 0.55 (95% CI, 0.38–0.71).Conclusion:There is moderate inter-rater and intra-rater agreement in classifying the vascularity of spinal metastases on a three-step ordinal scale for DSA tumor blush.
AB - Background: Preoperative embolization is based on the preoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) tumor blush, and as such is considered the “gold standard” for determining tumor vascularity. However, to our knowledge reliability studies evaluating vascularity ratings of DSA tumor blush in spinal metastases have not been published previously.Purpose:To evaluate inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using DSA tumor blush.Material and Methods:This reliability study included 46 patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression requiring surgery. DSA data stored in the hospital picture archiving and communication system (PACS) from the participants of a randomized controlled trial were used. Inter- and intra-rater agreement on vascularity assessment using DSA tumor blush according to a three-step ordinal scale was evaluated: no hypervascularity; moderate hypervascularity; and pronounced hypervascularity. The statistical analysis was based on the linear weighted kappa’s for multiple raters that extend Cohen’s κ. Three raters and κ = 0.2 in the null hypothesis implied that the power of the study was 0.96.Results:Inter- and intra-rater agreements were moderate in rating the vascularity of spinal metastases and the agreements were significantly higher than the κ = 0.20 in the null hypothesis (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0001). The κ value for inter-rater agreement was 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–0.72) and for intra-rater agreement 0.55 (95% CI, 0.38–0.71).Conclusion:There is moderate inter-rater and intra-rater agreement in classifying the vascularity of spinal metastases on a three-step ordinal scale for DSA tumor blush.
KW - Vascularity
KW - digital subtraction angiography (DSA)
KW - inter-rater agreement
KW - reliability study
KW - spinal metastases
KW - tumor blush
U2 - 10.1177/0284185116668215
DO - 10.1177/0284185116668215
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27650032
VL - 58
SP - 734
EP - 739
JO - Acta Radiologica - Series Diagnosis
JF - Acta Radiologica - Series Diagnosis
SN - 0365-5954
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 172470816