Intentional stance as observable order: when blind people adapt to an AI (VUI-SPEAK: There is Nothing Conversational about ”Conversational User Interfaces): 2. Atypical Interaction
Research output: Contribution to conference › Conference abstract for conference › Research › peer-review
Intentional stance as observable order: when blind people adapt to an AI
2. Atypical Interaction
Blind people are increasingly using systems like Google Home to control music, TV, etc. because the
voice (instead of the visual) affords the kind of interaction, most suitable for people with visual
impairment. EMCA studies have revealed, that interactions with these systems cannot be understood
as a sole activity, but most be understood within the embedded context of everyday life, and that
these conversational systems are not really being conversational (Porcheron et al., 2018). However,
such studies have not looked into the multimodal, spatial and embodied nature of interactions in and
around the device, and have not dealt with atypical populations like e.g. blind people.
Through ethnomethodological conversation analysis and video ethnography (Heath et al., 2010), this
paper shows how problems with making the device understand commands is dealt with through
repairing actions, that are designed to adjust to the expected logic of the device. This research thus
contributes to the discussions on intentional stance (Dennett, 1989)by respecifying it as an socially
accountable accomplishment.
Dennett, D. C. (1989). The Intentional Stance (Reprint edition). A Bradford Book.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Porcheron, M., Fischer, J. E., Reeves, S., & Sharples, S. (2018). Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life |
Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’18:
Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paper no. 640, 1–
12.
2. Atypical Interaction
Blind people are increasingly using systems like Google Home to control music, TV, etc. because the
voice (instead of the visual) affords the kind of interaction, most suitable for people with visual
impairment. EMCA studies have revealed, that interactions with these systems cannot be understood
as a sole activity, but most be understood within the embedded context of everyday life, and that
these conversational systems are not really being conversational (Porcheron et al., 2018). However,
such studies have not looked into the multimodal, spatial and embodied nature of interactions in and
around the device, and have not dealt with atypical populations like e.g. blind people.
Through ethnomethodological conversation analysis and video ethnography (Heath et al., 2010), this
paper shows how problems with making the device understand commands is dealt with through
repairing actions, that are designed to adjust to the expected logic of the device. This research thus
contributes to the discussions on intentional stance (Dennett, 1989)by respecifying it as an socially
accountable accomplishment.
Dennett, D. C. (1989). The Intentional Stance (Reprint edition). A Bradford Book.
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Porcheron, M., Fischer, J. E., Reeves, S., & Sharples, S. (2018). Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life |
Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’18:
Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paper no. 640, 1–
12.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication date | 17 Nov 2021 |
Publication status | Published - 17 Nov 2021 |
Event | NORDISCO: 6th Interdisciplinary Conference on Discourse and Interaction - Duration: 17 Nov 2021 → 19 Nov 2021 https://www.nordisco2021.se/program-2/ |
Conference
Conference | NORDISCO |
---|---|
Period | 17/11/2021 → 19/11/2021 |
Internet address |
ID: 284901415