Intensive care unit diaries: Developing a shared story strengthens relationships between critically ill patients and their relatives: A hermeneutic-phenomenological study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Intensive care unit diaries : Developing a shared story strengthens relationships between critically ill patients and their relatives: A hermeneutic-phenomenological study. / Nielsen, Anne Højager; Egerod, Ingrid; Hansen, Torben Bæk; Angel, Sanne.
In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 92, 04.2019, p. 90-96.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Intensive care unit diaries
T2 - Developing a shared story strengthens relationships between critically ill patients and their relatives: A hermeneutic-phenomenological study
AU - Nielsen, Anne Højager
AU - Egerod, Ingrid
AU - Hansen, Torben Bæk
AU - Angel, Sanne
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Background: After discharge from the intensive care unit, patients and relatives struggle to rebuild their lives while suffering from fatigue and distress. Intensive care unit diaries written by relatives are a novel approach that may help relatives and patients process the critical illness experience together. Objectives: To explore patients’ and relatives’ perceptions and use of a diary written by relatives for the critically ill patient. Design: Hermeneutical-phenomenological interview study. Setting: Two regional mixed surgical/medical intensive care units in a regional hospital. Participants: 10 critically ill patients and 13 relatives. All participants were 18 years or older, all patients had undergone mechanical ventilation. Methods: Dyadic, in-depth interviews conducted at 3–6 months and 8–16 months after discharge from the intensive care unit in 2015–2017. Interviews were analyzed using Ricoeur's theory of interpretation; a three-step process initiated by a naïve reading; followed by a structural analysis exploring the internal relations of the text, and finally, a critical interpretation to identify the most probable interpretation. Results: Before sharing the intensive care unit diary, relatives had to feel able to give the diary to the patient, which meant separating themselves from the diary and being available for discussions with the patient. Likewise, the patients had to be prepared to receive the diary and to acknowledge relatives’ efforts. Sharing the diary included interpreting the content of the diary, and developing a re-configured story based on the diary. Conclusion: The diary written by relatives for the critically ill patient was fulfilled when the diary was shared between the authoring relative and patient and a re-configured story was developed. This enabled a strengthened relationship between patient and relative. Not sharing could be disappointing to the relative, but did not preclude discussion of the experience of critical illness. This study provides professionals with knowledge about supporting patients and relatives through intensive care unit diaries written by relatives. Relatives need guidance on when to share the diary with the patient and how to accept patient rejection.
AB - Background: After discharge from the intensive care unit, patients and relatives struggle to rebuild their lives while suffering from fatigue and distress. Intensive care unit diaries written by relatives are a novel approach that may help relatives and patients process the critical illness experience together. Objectives: To explore patients’ and relatives’ perceptions and use of a diary written by relatives for the critically ill patient. Design: Hermeneutical-phenomenological interview study. Setting: Two regional mixed surgical/medical intensive care units in a regional hospital. Participants: 10 critically ill patients and 13 relatives. All participants were 18 years or older, all patients had undergone mechanical ventilation. Methods: Dyadic, in-depth interviews conducted at 3–6 months and 8–16 months after discharge from the intensive care unit in 2015–2017. Interviews were analyzed using Ricoeur's theory of interpretation; a three-step process initiated by a naïve reading; followed by a structural analysis exploring the internal relations of the text, and finally, a critical interpretation to identify the most probable interpretation. Results: Before sharing the intensive care unit diary, relatives had to feel able to give the diary to the patient, which meant separating themselves from the diary and being available for discussions with the patient. Likewise, the patients had to be prepared to receive the diary and to acknowledge relatives’ efforts. Sharing the diary included interpreting the content of the diary, and developing a re-configured story based on the diary. Conclusion: The diary written by relatives for the critically ill patient was fulfilled when the diary was shared between the authoring relative and patient and a re-configured story was developed. This enabled a strengthened relationship between patient and relative. Not sharing could be disappointing to the relative, but did not preclude discussion of the experience of critical illness. This study provides professionals with knowledge about supporting patients and relatives through intensive care unit diaries written by relatives. Relatives need guidance on when to share the diary with the patient and how to accept patient rejection.
KW - Critical care
KW - Critical care nursing
KW - Diaries
KW - Family nursing
KW - Hermeneutical phenomenology
KW - Intensive care diaries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061177101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.009
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30753929
AN - SCOPUS:85061177101
VL - 92
SP - 90
EP - 96
JO - Nursing
JF - Nursing
SN - 0020-7489
ER -
ID: 239258754