Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality: iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality : iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR. / Eftekhari, Ashkan; Holck, Emil Nielsen; Westra, Jelmer; Olsen, Niels Thue; Bruun, Niels Henrik; Jensen, Lisette Okkels; Engstrøm, Thomas; Christiansen, Evald Høj.
In: European Heart Journal, Vol. 44, No. 41, 2023, p. 4376-4384.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Instantaneous wave free ratio vs. fractional flow reserve and 5-year mortality
T2 - iFR SWEDEHEART and DEFINE FLAIR
AU - Eftekhari, Ashkan
AU - Holck, Emil Nielsen
AU - Westra, Jelmer
AU - Olsen, Niels Thue
AU - Bruun, Niels Henrik
AU - Jensen, Lisette Okkels
AU - Engstrøm, Thomas
AU - Christiansen, Evald Høj
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background and Guidelines recommend revascularization of intermediate epicardial artery stenosis to be guided by evidence of ischaemia. Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are equally recommended. Individual 5-year results of two major randomized trials comparing FFR with iFR-guided revascularization suggested increased all-cause mortality following iFR-guided revascularization. The aim of this study was a study-level meta-analysis of the 5-year outcome data in iFR-SWEDEHEART (NCT02166736) and DEFINE-FLAIR (NCT02053038).Methods Composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its individual components [all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularisation] were analysed. Raw Kaplan–Meier estimates, numbers at risk, and number of events were extracted at 5-year follow-up and analysed using the ipdfc package (Stata version 18, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA)Results In total, iFR and FFR-guided revascularization was performed in 2254 and 2257 patients, respectively. Revascularization was more often deferred in the iFR group [n = 1128 (50.0%)] vs. the FFR group [n = 1021 (45.2%); P = .001]. In the iFR-guided group, the number of deaths, MACE, unplanned revascularization, and MI was 188 (8.3%), 484 (21.5%), 235 (10.4%), and 123 (5.5%) vs. 143 (6.3%), 420 (18.6%), 241 (10.7%), and 123 (5.4%) in the FFR group. Hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] estimates for MACE were 1.18 [1.04; 1.34], all-cause mortality 1.34 [1.08; 1.67], unplanned revascularization 0.99 [0.83; 1.19], and MI 1.02 [0.80; 1.Conclusions Five-year all-cause mortality and MACE rates were increased with revascularization guided by iFR compared to FFR. Rates of unplanned revascularization and MI were equal in the two groups.
AB - Background and Guidelines recommend revascularization of intermediate epicardial artery stenosis to be guided by evidence of ischaemia. Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are equally recommended. Individual 5-year results of two major randomized trials comparing FFR with iFR-guided revascularization suggested increased all-cause mortality following iFR-guided revascularization. The aim of this study was a study-level meta-analysis of the 5-year outcome data in iFR-SWEDEHEART (NCT02166736) and DEFINE-FLAIR (NCT02053038).Methods Composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its individual components [all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularisation] were analysed. Raw Kaplan–Meier estimates, numbers at risk, and number of events were extracted at 5-year follow-up and analysed using the ipdfc package (Stata version 18, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA)Results In total, iFR and FFR-guided revascularization was performed in 2254 and 2257 patients, respectively. Revascularization was more often deferred in the iFR group [n = 1128 (50.0%)] vs. the FFR group [n = 1021 (45.2%); P = .001]. In the iFR-guided group, the number of deaths, MACE, unplanned revascularization, and MI was 188 (8.3%), 484 (21.5%), 235 (10.4%), and 123 (5.5%) vs. 143 (6.3%), 420 (18.6%), 241 (10.7%), and 123 (5.4%) in the FFR group. Hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] estimates for MACE were 1.18 [1.04; 1.34], all-cause mortality 1.34 [1.08; 1.67], unplanned revascularization 0.99 [0.83; 1.19], and MI 1.02 [0.80; 1.Conclusions Five-year all-cause mortality and MACE rates were increased with revascularization guided by iFR compared to FFR. Rates of unplanned revascularization and MI were equal in the two groups.
KW - Coronary physiology
KW - Fractional flow reserve
KW - Instantaneous wave-free ratio
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad582
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad582
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37634144
AN - SCOPUS:85176495198
VL - 44
SP - 4376
EP - 4384
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
SN - 0195-668X
IS - 41
ER -
ID: 396016938