Informed choice about Down syndrome screening - effect of an eHealth tool: a randomized controlled trial
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Informed choice about Down syndrome screening - effect of an eHealth tool : a randomized controlled trial. / Skjøth, Mette M; Draborg, Eva; Lamont, Ronald F; Pedersen, Claus D; Hansen, Helle P; Ekstrøm, Claus T; Jørgensen, Jan S.
In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Vol. 94, No. 12, 12.2015, p. 1327-1336.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Informed choice about Down syndrome screening - effect of an eHealth tool
T2 - a randomized controlled trial
AU - Skjøth, Mette M
AU - Draborg, Eva
AU - Lamont, Ronald F
AU - Pedersen, Claus D
AU - Hansen, Helle P
AU - Ekstrøm, Claus T
AU - Jørgensen, Jan S
N1 - © 2015 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an eHealth intervention (interactive website) on pregnant women's ability to make an informed choice about Down syndrome screening.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with allocation to an intervention group and a control group in a ratio of 1:1. Subsequent subgroup analysis was conducted. Participants were recruited from 5 August 2013 to 25 April 2014 at Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Inclusion criteria were: pregnant women aged ≥18 years who were invited to participate in Down syndrome screening. Exclusion criteria were: high risk of abortion, psycho-socially vulnerable women, late referral, inability to speak Danish and women declining to participate. The primary outcome was informed choice about Down syndrome screening. The Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice was used to assess whether the choice was informed or uninformed.RESULTS: A total of 1150 participants were included in the study, of which 910 (79%) completed the questionnaire. Only a minority (30% of the women in the intervention group) actually used the website. There was no significant difference in the groups with respect to making an informed choice. The mean knowledge scores were significantly higher for those in the intervention group who used the intervention.CONCLUSIONS: An interactive website with information about Down syndrome screening had no direct effect on making an informed choice. However, the majority of the pregnant women who used the website were satisfied with the website and would recommend it to others.
AB - INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an eHealth intervention (interactive website) on pregnant women's ability to make an informed choice about Down syndrome screening.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with allocation to an intervention group and a control group in a ratio of 1:1. Subsequent subgroup analysis was conducted. Participants were recruited from 5 August 2013 to 25 April 2014 at Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Inclusion criteria were: pregnant women aged ≥18 years who were invited to participate in Down syndrome screening. Exclusion criteria were: high risk of abortion, psycho-socially vulnerable women, late referral, inability to speak Danish and women declining to participate. The primary outcome was informed choice about Down syndrome screening. The Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice was used to assess whether the choice was informed or uninformed.RESULTS: A total of 1150 participants were included in the study, of which 910 (79%) completed the questionnaire. Only a minority (30% of the women in the intervention group) actually used the website. There was no significant difference in the groups with respect to making an informed choice. The mean knowledge scores were significantly higher for those in the intervention group who used the intervention.CONCLUSIONS: An interactive website with information about Down syndrome screening had no direct effect on making an informed choice. However, the majority of the pregnant women who used the website were satisfied with the website and would recommend it to others.
KW - Adult
KW - Choice Behavior
KW - Denmark
KW - Down Syndrome
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Prenatal Diagnosis
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Telemedicine
KW - Journal Article
KW - Randomized Controlled Trial
KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
U2 - 10.1111/aogs.12758
DO - 10.1111/aogs.12758
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26332592
VL - 94
SP - 1327
EP - 1336
JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
SN - 0001-6349
IS - 12
ER -
ID: 165692996