Influence of Prior Imaging Information on Diagnostic Accuracy for Focal Skeletal Processes — A Retrospective Analysis of the Consistency between Biopsy-Verified Imaging Diagnoses
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Influence of Prior Imaging Information on Diagnostic Accuracy for Focal Skeletal Processes — A Retrospective Analysis of the Consistency between Biopsy-Verified Imaging Diagnoses. / Lange, Mine Benedicte; Petersen, Lars J.; Lausen, Mads; Bruun, Niels Henrik; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann; Zacho, Helle D.
In: Diagnostics, Vol. 12, No. 7, 1735, 2022.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of Prior Imaging Information on Diagnostic Accuracy for Focal Skeletal Processes — A Retrospective Analysis of the Consistency between Biopsy-Verified Imaging Diagnoses
AU - Lange, Mine Benedicte
AU - Petersen, Lars J.
AU - Lausen, Mads
AU - Bruun, Niels Henrik
AU - Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
AU - Zacho, Helle D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction: Comparing imaging examinations with those previously obtained is considered mandatory in imaging guidelines. To our knowledge, no studies are available on neither the influence, nor the sequence, of prior imaging and reports on diagnostic accuracy using biopsy as the reference standard. Such data are important to minimize diagnostic errors and to improve the preparation of diagnostic imaging guidelines. The aim of our study was to provide such data. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort of 216 consecutive skeletal biopsies from patients with at least 2 different imaging modalities (X-ray, CT and MRI) performed within 6 months of biopsy was identified. The diagnostic accuracy of the individual imaging modality was assessed. Finally, the possible influence of the sequence of imaging modalities was investigated. Results: No significant difference in the accuracy of the imaging modalities was shown, being preceded by another imaging modality or not. However, the sequence analyses indicate sequential biases, particularly if MRI was the first imaging modality. Conclusion: The sequence of the imaging modalities seems to influence the diagnostic accuracy against a pathology reference standard. Further studies are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for the strategy of using previous imaging and reports to improve diagnostic accuracy.
AB - Introduction: Comparing imaging examinations with those previously obtained is considered mandatory in imaging guidelines. To our knowledge, no studies are available on neither the influence, nor the sequence, of prior imaging and reports on diagnostic accuracy using biopsy as the reference standard. Such data are important to minimize diagnostic errors and to improve the preparation of diagnostic imaging guidelines. The aim of our study was to provide such data. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort of 216 consecutive skeletal biopsies from patients with at least 2 different imaging modalities (X-ray, CT and MRI) performed within 6 months of biopsy was identified. The diagnostic accuracy of the individual imaging modality was assessed. Finally, the possible influence of the sequence of imaging modalities was investigated. Results: No significant difference in the accuracy of the imaging modalities was shown, being preceded by another imaging modality or not. However, the sequence analyses indicate sequential biases, particularly if MRI was the first imaging modality. Conclusion: The sequence of the imaging modalities seems to influence the diagnostic accuracy against a pathology reference standard. Further studies are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for the strategy of using previous imaging and reports to improve diagnostic accuracy.
KW - biopsy
KW - bone
KW - cancer
KW - diagnostic accuracy
KW - medical imaging
KW - metastasis
KW - prior imaging
KW - reports
KW - tumor
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics12071735
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics12071735
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35885639
AN - SCOPUS:85137344754
VL - 12
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
SN - 2075-4418
IS - 7
M1 - 1735
ER -
ID: 326447010