Impact of maternal mental health interventions on child-related outcomes in low- And middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Impact of maternal mental health interventions on child-related outcomes in low- And middle-income countries : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Tol, W. A.; Greene, M. C.; Lasater, M. E.; Le Roch, K.; Bizouerne, C.; Purgato, M.; Tomlinson, M.; Barbui, C.

In: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, Vol. 29, e174, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tol, WA, Greene, MC, Lasater, ME, Le Roch, K, Bizouerne, C, Purgato, M, Tomlinson, M & Barbui, C 2020, 'Impact of maternal mental health interventions on child-related outcomes in low- And middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis', Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, vol. 29, e174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000864

APA

Tol, W. A., Greene, M. C., Lasater, M. E., Le Roch, K., Bizouerne, C., Purgato, M., Tomlinson, M., & Barbui, C. (2020). Impact of maternal mental health interventions on child-related outcomes in low- And middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 29, [e174]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000864

Vancouver

Tol WA, Greene MC, Lasater ME, Le Roch K, Bizouerne C, Purgato M et al. Impact of maternal mental health interventions on child-related outcomes in low- And middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 2020;29. e174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000864

Author

Tol, W. A. ; Greene, M. C. ; Lasater, M. E. ; Le Roch, K. ; Bizouerne, C. ; Purgato, M. ; Tomlinson, M. ; Barbui, C. / Impact of maternal mental health interventions on child-related outcomes in low- And middle-income countries : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 2020 ; Vol. 29.

Bibtex

@article{437fc92b6ceb4f0f88ab1366e89947b2,
title = "Impact of maternal mental health interventions on child-related outcomes in low- And middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Aims. Observational studies have shown a relationship between maternal mental health (MMH) and child development, but few studies have evaluated whether MMH interventions improve child-related outcomes, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of this review is to synthesise findings on the effectiveness of MMH interventions to improve child-related outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods. We searched for randomised controlled trials conducted in LMICs evaluating interventions with a MMH component and reporting children's outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed on outcomes included in at least two trials. Results. We identified 21 trials with 28 284 mother-child dyads. Most trials were conducted in middle-income countries, evaluating home visiting interventions delivered by general health workers, starting in the third trimester of pregnancy. Only ten trials described acceptable methods for blinding outcome assessors. Four trials showed high risk of bias in at least two of the seven domains assessed in this review. Narrative synthesis showed promising but inconclusive findings for child-related outcomes. Meta-analysis identified a sizeable impact of interventions on exclusive breastfeeding (risk ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.71, ten trials, N = 4749 mother-child dyads, I2 = 61%) and a small effect on child height-forage at 6-months (std. mean difference = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.24, three trials, N = 1388, I2 = 0%). Meta-analyses did not identify intervention benefits for child cognitive and other growth outcomes; however, few trials measured these outcomes. Conclusions. These findings support the importance of MMH to improve child-related outcomes in LMICs, particularly exclusive breastfeeding. Given, the small number of trials and methodological limitations, more rigorous trials should be conducted.",
keywords = "Child health, Low- and middle-income countries, Maternal mental health, Perinatal",
author = "Tol, {W. A.} and Greene, {M. C.} and Lasater, {M. E.} and {Le Roch}, K. and C. Bizouerne and M. Purgato and M. Tomlinson and C. Barbui",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1017/S2045796020000864",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
journal = "Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences",
issn = "2045-7960",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of maternal mental health interventions on child-related outcomes in low- And middle-income countries

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Tol, W. A.

AU - Greene, M. C.

AU - Lasater, M. E.

AU - Le Roch, K.

AU - Bizouerne, C.

AU - Purgato, M.

AU - Tomlinson, M.

AU - Barbui, C.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Aims. Observational studies have shown a relationship between maternal mental health (MMH) and child development, but few studies have evaluated whether MMH interventions improve child-related outcomes, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of this review is to synthesise findings on the effectiveness of MMH interventions to improve child-related outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods. We searched for randomised controlled trials conducted in LMICs evaluating interventions with a MMH component and reporting children's outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed on outcomes included in at least two trials. Results. We identified 21 trials with 28 284 mother-child dyads. Most trials were conducted in middle-income countries, evaluating home visiting interventions delivered by general health workers, starting in the third trimester of pregnancy. Only ten trials described acceptable methods for blinding outcome assessors. Four trials showed high risk of bias in at least two of the seven domains assessed in this review. Narrative synthesis showed promising but inconclusive findings for child-related outcomes. Meta-analysis identified a sizeable impact of interventions on exclusive breastfeeding (risk ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.71, ten trials, N = 4749 mother-child dyads, I2 = 61%) and a small effect on child height-forage at 6-months (std. mean difference = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.24, three trials, N = 1388, I2 = 0%). Meta-analyses did not identify intervention benefits for child cognitive and other growth outcomes; however, few trials measured these outcomes. Conclusions. These findings support the importance of MMH to improve child-related outcomes in LMICs, particularly exclusive breastfeeding. Given, the small number of trials and methodological limitations, more rigorous trials should be conducted.

AB - Aims. Observational studies have shown a relationship between maternal mental health (MMH) and child development, but few studies have evaluated whether MMH interventions improve child-related outcomes, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of this review is to synthesise findings on the effectiveness of MMH interventions to improve child-related outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods. We searched for randomised controlled trials conducted in LMICs evaluating interventions with a MMH component and reporting children's outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed on outcomes included in at least two trials. Results. We identified 21 trials with 28 284 mother-child dyads. Most trials were conducted in middle-income countries, evaluating home visiting interventions delivered by general health workers, starting in the third trimester of pregnancy. Only ten trials described acceptable methods for blinding outcome assessors. Four trials showed high risk of bias in at least two of the seven domains assessed in this review. Narrative synthesis showed promising but inconclusive findings for child-related outcomes. Meta-analysis identified a sizeable impact of interventions on exclusive breastfeeding (risk ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.71, ten trials, N = 4749 mother-child dyads, I2 = 61%) and a small effect on child height-forage at 6-months (std. mean difference = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.24, three trials, N = 1388, I2 = 0%). Meta-analyses did not identify intervention benefits for child cognitive and other growth outcomes; however, few trials measured these outcomes. Conclusions. These findings support the importance of MMH to improve child-related outcomes in LMICs, particularly exclusive breastfeeding. Given, the small number of trials and methodological limitations, more rigorous trials should be conducted.

KW - Child health

KW - Low- and middle-income countries

KW - Maternal mental health

KW - Perinatal

U2 - 10.1017/S2045796020000864

DO - 10.1017/S2045796020000864

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33070789

AN - SCOPUS:85093642933

VL - 29

JO - Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

JF - Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences

SN - 2045-7960

M1 - e174

ER -

ID: 250914550