How do socio-economic factors and distance predict access to prevention and rehabilitation services in a Danish municipality?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

How do socio-economic factors and distance predict access to prevention and rehabilitation services in a Danish municipality? / Hindhede, Anette Lykke; Bonde, Ane; Schipperijn, Jasper; Scheuer, Stine H; Sørensen, Susanne Margrethe; Aagaard-Hansen, Jens.

In: Primary Health Care Research and Development, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hindhede, AL, Bonde, A, Schipperijn, J, Scheuer, SH, Sørensen, SM & Aagaard-Hansen, J 2016, 'How do socio-economic factors and distance predict access to prevention and rehabilitation services in a Danish municipality?', Primary Health Care Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000268

APA

Hindhede, A. L., Bonde, A., Schipperijn, J., Scheuer, S. H., Sørensen, S. M., & Aagaard-Hansen, J. (2016). How do socio-economic factors and distance predict access to prevention and rehabilitation services in a Danish municipality? Primary Health Care Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000268

Vancouver

Hindhede AL, Bonde A, Schipperijn J, Scheuer SH, Sørensen SM, Aagaard-Hansen J. How do socio-economic factors and distance predict access to prevention and rehabilitation services in a Danish municipality? Primary Health Care Research and Development. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000268

Author

Hindhede, Anette Lykke ; Bonde, Ane ; Schipperijn, Jasper ; Scheuer, Stine H ; Sørensen, Susanne Margrethe ; Aagaard-Hansen, Jens. / How do socio-economic factors and distance predict access to prevention and rehabilitation services in a Danish municipality?. In: Primary Health Care Research and Development. 2016.

Bibtex

@article{486ecdd8a0134afab3c817176afc0acb,
title = "How do socio-economic factors and distance predict access to prevention and rehabilitation services in a Danish municipality?",
abstract = "Aim: The aim was to explore to which extent a Danish prevention centre catered for marginalised groups within the catchment area. We examined if the district{\textquoteright}s socio-economic vulnerability status and distance from the citizens{\textquoteright} residential sector to the centre influenced referrals of citizens to the centre, citizens{\textquoteright} attendance at initial appointment and completion of planned activities at the centre.Background: Disparities in access to health care services is one among many aspects of inequality in health. The determinants within populations (e.g. socio-economic status, ethnicity and education) as well as the health care systems (e.g. resource availability and cultural acceptability) are many.Methods: A total of 347 participants referred to the centre during a period of 10 months were included. For each of 44 districts within the catchment area, the degree of socio-economic vulnerability was estimated based on the citizens{\textquoteright} educational level, ethnicity, income, and unemployment rate and a socio-economic vulnerability score (SE-score) was calculated. Logistic regression was used to describe the probability that a person was referred to the centre, attended the initial appointment and completed the planned activities, depending on sex, age, SE-score of district of residence and distance to the centre.Findings: Citizens from locations with a high socio-economic vulnerability had increased probability of being referred by general practitioners, hospital and job centre. Citizens living further away from the prevention centre had a reduced probability of being referred by their general practitioners. After referral there was no difference in probability of attendance or completion as a function of SE-score or distance between the citizens{\textquoteright} district and the centre. In conclusion, the centre is capable of attracting referrals from districts where the need is likely to be relatively high in terms of socio-economic vulnerability, whereas distance reduced the probability of referral. No differences were found in attendance or completion.",
author = "Hindhede, {Anette Lykke} and Ane Bonde and Jasper Schipperijn and Scheuer, {Stine H} and S{\o}rensen, {Susanne Margrethe} and Jens Aagaard-Hansen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1017/S1463423616000268",
language = "English",
journal = "Primary Health Care Research and Development",
issn = "1463-4236",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do socio-economic factors and distance predict access to prevention and rehabilitation services in a Danish municipality?

AU - Hindhede, Anette Lykke

AU - Bonde, Ane

AU - Schipperijn, Jasper

AU - Scheuer, Stine H

AU - Sørensen, Susanne Margrethe

AU - Aagaard-Hansen, Jens

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Aim: The aim was to explore to which extent a Danish prevention centre catered for marginalised groups within the catchment area. We examined if the district’s socio-economic vulnerability status and distance from the citizens’ residential sector to the centre influenced referrals of citizens to the centre, citizens’ attendance at initial appointment and completion of planned activities at the centre.Background: Disparities in access to health care services is one among many aspects of inequality in health. The determinants within populations (e.g. socio-economic status, ethnicity and education) as well as the health care systems (e.g. resource availability and cultural acceptability) are many.Methods: A total of 347 participants referred to the centre during a period of 10 months were included. For each of 44 districts within the catchment area, the degree of socio-economic vulnerability was estimated based on the citizens’ educational level, ethnicity, income, and unemployment rate and a socio-economic vulnerability score (SE-score) was calculated. Logistic regression was used to describe the probability that a person was referred to the centre, attended the initial appointment and completed the planned activities, depending on sex, age, SE-score of district of residence and distance to the centre.Findings: Citizens from locations with a high socio-economic vulnerability had increased probability of being referred by general practitioners, hospital and job centre. Citizens living further away from the prevention centre had a reduced probability of being referred by their general practitioners. After referral there was no difference in probability of attendance or completion as a function of SE-score or distance between the citizens’ district and the centre. In conclusion, the centre is capable of attracting referrals from districts where the need is likely to be relatively high in terms of socio-economic vulnerability, whereas distance reduced the probability of referral. No differences were found in attendance or completion.

AB - Aim: The aim was to explore to which extent a Danish prevention centre catered for marginalised groups within the catchment area. We examined if the district’s socio-economic vulnerability status and distance from the citizens’ residential sector to the centre influenced referrals of citizens to the centre, citizens’ attendance at initial appointment and completion of planned activities at the centre.Background: Disparities in access to health care services is one among many aspects of inequality in health. The determinants within populations (e.g. socio-economic status, ethnicity and education) as well as the health care systems (e.g. resource availability and cultural acceptability) are many.Methods: A total of 347 participants referred to the centre during a period of 10 months were included. For each of 44 districts within the catchment area, the degree of socio-economic vulnerability was estimated based on the citizens’ educational level, ethnicity, income, and unemployment rate and a socio-economic vulnerability score (SE-score) was calculated. Logistic regression was used to describe the probability that a person was referred to the centre, attended the initial appointment and completed the planned activities, depending on sex, age, SE-score of district of residence and distance to the centre.Findings: Citizens from locations with a high socio-economic vulnerability had increased probability of being referred by general practitioners, hospital and job centre. Citizens living further away from the prevention centre had a reduced probability of being referred by their general practitioners. After referral there was no difference in probability of attendance or completion as a function of SE-score or distance between the citizens’ district and the centre. In conclusion, the centre is capable of attracting referrals from districts where the need is likely to be relatively high in terms of socio-economic vulnerability, whereas distance reduced the probability of referral. No differences were found in attendance or completion.

UR - https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/5da71141-2388-4e5a-9fb6-3ba552b48997

U2 - 10.1017/S1463423616000268

DO - 10.1017/S1463423616000268

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27515913

JO - Primary Health Care Research and Development

JF - Primary Health Care Research and Development

SN - 1463-4236

ER -

ID: 317084741