How deliberation makes better citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
How deliberation makes better citizens : The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro. / Hansen, Kasper Møller; Normann Andersen, Vibeke.
In: European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2007, p. 531-556.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - How deliberation makes better citizens
T2 - The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro
AU - Hansen, Kasper Møller
AU - Normann Andersen, Vibeke
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - This article presents results from a Danish national Deliberative Poll on the single European currency. A representative sample of 364 Danish citizens assembled to deliberate on Denmark's participation in the single currency. As a quasi-experiment, the Deliberative Poll is an example of deliberative democracy. Four research questions regarding these deliberative processes are analyzed: openness and access, the quality of deliberation, efficiency and effectiveness, and publicity and accountability. The participants' responses reflect a deliberative process characterized by considerable changes in political opinions as the Poll proceeds, increase in level of knowledge and an improved ability to form reasoned opinions. A mutual understanding on the subject matter prevailed among the participants. At the same time, self-interest and domination also appeared during the deliberative process. The article emphasizes the need for further elaboration of the theory of deliberative democracy so that it better reflects these features of ‘real-life' politics.
AB - This article presents results from a Danish national Deliberative Poll on the single European currency. A representative sample of 364 Danish citizens assembled to deliberate on Denmark's participation in the single currency. As a quasi-experiment, the Deliberative Poll is an example of deliberative democracy. Four research questions regarding these deliberative processes are analyzed: openness and access, the quality of deliberation, efficiency and effectiveness, and publicity and accountability. The participants' responses reflect a deliberative process characterized by considerable changes in political opinions as the Poll proceeds, increase in level of knowledge and an improved ability to form reasoned opinions. A mutual understanding on the subject matter prevailed among the participants. At the same time, self-interest and domination also appeared during the deliberative process. The article emphasizes the need for further elaboration of the theory of deliberative democracy so that it better reflects these features of ‘real-life' politics.
U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00699.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00699.x
M3 - Journal article
VL - 46
SP - 531
EP - 556
JO - European Journal of Political Research
JF - European Journal of Political Research
SN - 0304-4130
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 1564114