High completeness and accurate reporting of key variables make data from the danish shoulder arthroplasty registry a valuable source of information

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

High completeness and accurate reporting of key variables make data from the danish shoulder arthroplasty registry a valuable source of information. / Rasmussen, Jeppe Vejlgaard; El-Galaly, Anders; Thillemann, Theis Muncholm; Jensen, Steen Lund.

In: Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 13, 2021, p. 141-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rasmussen, JV, El-Galaly, A, Thillemann, TM & Jensen, SL 2021, 'High completeness and accurate reporting of key variables make data from the danish shoulder arthroplasty registry a valuable source of information', Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 13, pp. 141-148. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S291972

APA

Rasmussen, J. V., El-Galaly, A., Thillemann, T. M., & Jensen, S. L. (2021). High completeness and accurate reporting of key variables make data from the danish shoulder arthroplasty registry a valuable source of information. Clinical Epidemiology, 13, 141-148. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S291972

Vancouver

Rasmussen JV, El-Galaly A, Thillemann TM, Jensen SL. High completeness and accurate reporting of key variables make data from the danish shoulder arthroplasty registry a valuable source of information. Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;13:141-148. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S291972

Author

Rasmussen, Jeppe Vejlgaard ; El-Galaly, Anders ; Thillemann, Theis Muncholm ; Jensen, Steen Lund. / High completeness and accurate reporting of key variables make data from the danish shoulder arthroplasty registry a valuable source of information. In: Clinical Epidemiology. 2021 ; Vol. 13. pp. 141-148.

Bibtex

@article{50c05b7cdb5441a091ec9b10170e735e,
title = "High completeness and accurate reporting of key variables make data from the danish shoulder arthroplasty registry a valuable source of information",
abstract = "Purpose: The Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (DSR) is a nationwide database provid-ing data for research and health care monitoring. The aim of this study was to validate the DSR by (1) assessing registration completeness, (2) comparing key variables with information from medical records, (3) assessing the number and proportion of missing data for key variables. Materials and Methods: The completeness of registration in the DSR from 2006–2015 was assessed for primary arthroplasties by comparing the number of arthroplasties reported to the DSR with the number of arthroplasties recorded by the Danish National Patient Register which is an administrative database used by the Danish healthcare authorities to monitor all hospitalizations including shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Positive predictive values (PPV) were used to estimate the accuracy of the reporting in a randomly selected population. Information retrieved from medical records were used as gold standard. The number of missing values for each variable was evaluated to depict if these registrations were missing at random. Results: The completeness of reporting was 94.4. The PPV for the three major indications: osteoarthritis, fracture and rotator cuff arthropathy was 92%, 97%, and 94%, respectively. PPV was high for resurfacing arthroplasty (93%) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (93%), but low for total shoulder arthroplasty (79%) and hemiarthroplasty (83%). The proportion of missing data in DSR was less than 1% for age, gender, previous surgery, indication and arthroplasty type and these can be regarded as missing at random. Conclusion: The study showed that data from the DSR are sufficiently valid to be used for research and quality monitoring. Lower PPV{\textquoteright}s for total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiar-throplasty are possibly related to inadequate definitions and mutually nonexclusive items in the reporting form. Regular validation is necessary since the data reported to the registry continuously evolve because of changes in clinical practice.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Arthroplasty, Completeness, Positive predictive value, Registry, Shoulder",
author = "Rasmussen, {Jeppe Vejlgaard} and Anders El-Galaly and Thillemann, {Theis Muncholm} and Jensen, {Steen Lund}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.2147/CLEP.S291972",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "141--148",
journal = "Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "1179-1349",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - High completeness and accurate reporting of key variables make data from the danish shoulder arthroplasty registry a valuable source of information

AU - Rasmussen, Jeppe Vejlgaard

AU - El-Galaly, Anders

AU - Thillemann, Theis Muncholm

AU - Jensen, Steen Lund

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Purpose: The Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (DSR) is a nationwide database provid-ing data for research and health care monitoring. The aim of this study was to validate the DSR by (1) assessing registration completeness, (2) comparing key variables with information from medical records, (3) assessing the number and proportion of missing data for key variables. Materials and Methods: The completeness of registration in the DSR from 2006–2015 was assessed for primary arthroplasties by comparing the number of arthroplasties reported to the DSR with the number of arthroplasties recorded by the Danish National Patient Register which is an administrative database used by the Danish healthcare authorities to monitor all hospitalizations including shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Positive predictive values (PPV) were used to estimate the accuracy of the reporting in a randomly selected population. Information retrieved from medical records were used as gold standard. The number of missing values for each variable was evaluated to depict if these registrations were missing at random. Results: The completeness of reporting was 94.4. The PPV for the three major indications: osteoarthritis, fracture and rotator cuff arthropathy was 92%, 97%, and 94%, respectively. PPV was high for resurfacing arthroplasty (93%) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (93%), but low for total shoulder arthroplasty (79%) and hemiarthroplasty (83%). The proportion of missing data in DSR was less than 1% for age, gender, previous surgery, indication and arthroplasty type and these can be regarded as missing at random. Conclusion: The study showed that data from the DSR are sufficiently valid to be used for research and quality monitoring. Lower PPV’s for total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiar-throplasty are possibly related to inadequate definitions and mutually nonexclusive items in the reporting form. Regular validation is necessary since the data reported to the registry continuously evolve because of changes in clinical practice.

AB - Purpose: The Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (DSR) is a nationwide database provid-ing data for research and health care monitoring. The aim of this study was to validate the DSR by (1) assessing registration completeness, (2) comparing key variables with information from medical records, (3) assessing the number and proportion of missing data for key variables. Materials and Methods: The completeness of registration in the DSR from 2006–2015 was assessed for primary arthroplasties by comparing the number of arthroplasties reported to the DSR with the number of arthroplasties recorded by the Danish National Patient Register which is an administrative database used by the Danish healthcare authorities to monitor all hospitalizations including shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Positive predictive values (PPV) were used to estimate the accuracy of the reporting in a randomly selected population. Information retrieved from medical records were used as gold standard. The number of missing values for each variable was evaluated to depict if these registrations were missing at random. Results: The completeness of reporting was 94.4. The PPV for the three major indications: osteoarthritis, fracture and rotator cuff arthropathy was 92%, 97%, and 94%, respectively. PPV was high for resurfacing arthroplasty (93%) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (93%), but low for total shoulder arthroplasty (79%) and hemiarthroplasty (83%). The proportion of missing data in DSR was less than 1% for age, gender, previous surgery, indication and arthroplasty type and these can be regarded as missing at random. Conclusion: The study showed that data from the DSR are sufficiently valid to be used for research and quality monitoring. Lower PPV’s for total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiar-throplasty are possibly related to inadequate definitions and mutually nonexclusive items in the reporting form. Regular validation is necessary since the data reported to the registry continuously evolve because of changes in clinical practice.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Arthroplasty

KW - Completeness

KW - Positive predictive value

KW - Registry

KW - Shoulder

U2 - 10.2147/CLEP.S291972

DO - 10.2147/CLEP.S291972

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33654435

AN - SCOPUS:85102194517

VL - 13

SP - 141

EP - 148

JO - Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 1179-1349

ER -

ID: 259053382