Generating a Prioritized List of Operative Procedures for Simulation-based Assessment of General Surgery Trainees Through Consensus
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Generating a Prioritized List of Operative Procedures for Simulation-based Assessment of General Surgery Trainees Through Consensus. / Toale, Conor; Morris, Marie; Konge, Lars; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy; Roche, Adam; Heskin, Leonie; Kavanagh, Dara O.
In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 279, No. 5, 2024, p. 900-905.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Generating a Prioritized List of Operative Procedures for Simulation-based Assessment of General Surgery Trainees Through Consensus
AU - Toale, Conor
AU - Morris, Marie
AU - Konge, Lars
AU - Nayahangan, Leizl Joy
AU - Roche, Adam
AU - Heskin, Leonie
AU - Kavanagh, Dara O.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective: To develop appropriate content for high-stakes simulation-based assessments of operative competence in general surgery training through consensus. Background: Valid methods of summative operative competence assessment are required by competency-based training programs in surgery. Method: An online Delphi consensus study was conducted. Procedures were derived from the competency expectations outlined by the Joint Committee on Surgical Training Curriculum 2021, and subsequent brainstorming. Procedures were rated according to their perceived importance, perceived procedural risk, how frequently they are performed, and simualtion feasibility by a purposive sample of 30 surgical trainers and a 5-person steering group. A modified Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation Needs Assessment Formula was applied to the generated data to produce ranked procedural lists, which were returned to participants for re-prioritization. Results: Prioritized lists were generated for simulation-based operative competence assessments at 2 key stages of training; the end of 'phase 2' prior to the development of a sub-specialty interest, and the end of 'phase 3', that is, end-of-training certification. A total of 21 and 16 procedures were deemed suitable for assessments at each of these stages, respectively. Conclusions: This study describes a national needs assessment approach to content generation for simulation-based assessments of operative competence in general surgery using Delphi consensus methodology. The prioritized procedural lists generated by this study can be used to further develop operative skill assessments for use in high-stakes scenarios, such as trainee progression, entrustment, and end-of-training certification, before subsequent validity testing.
AB - Objective: To develop appropriate content for high-stakes simulation-based assessments of operative competence in general surgery training through consensus. Background: Valid methods of summative operative competence assessment are required by competency-based training programs in surgery. Method: An online Delphi consensus study was conducted. Procedures were derived from the competency expectations outlined by the Joint Committee on Surgical Training Curriculum 2021, and subsequent brainstorming. Procedures were rated according to their perceived importance, perceived procedural risk, how frequently they are performed, and simualtion feasibility by a purposive sample of 30 surgical trainers and a 5-person steering group. A modified Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation Needs Assessment Formula was applied to the generated data to produce ranked procedural lists, which were returned to participants for re-prioritization. Results: Prioritized lists were generated for simulation-based operative competence assessments at 2 key stages of training; the end of 'phase 2' prior to the development of a sub-specialty interest, and the end of 'phase 3', that is, end-of-training certification. A total of 21 and 16 procedures were deemed suitable for assessments at each of these stages, respectively. Conclusions: This study describes a national needs assessment approach to content generation for simulation-based assessments of operative competence in general surgery using Delphi consensus methodology. The prioritized procedural lists generated by this study can be used to further develop operative skill assessments for use in high-stakes scenarios, such as trainee progression, entrustment, and end-of-training certification, before subsequent validity testing.
KW - assessment
KW - competency-based education
KW - delphi study
KW - performance of procedures
KW - simulation
KW - surgery
KW - surgical skill
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006118
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006118
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37811854
AN - SCOPUS:85190106430
VL - 279
SP - 900
EP - 905
JO - Advances in Surgery
JF - Advances in Surgery
SN - 0003-4932
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 389666107