Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Improved-Field-of-View 3-D Ultrasound Performs Comparably to Computed Tomographic Angiography

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Improved-Field-of-View 3-D Ultrasound Performs Comparably to Computed Tomographic Angiography. / Zielinski, Alexander Hakon; Bredahl, Kim Kargaard; Ghulam, Qasam Mohammed; Rouet, Laurence; Dufour, Cecile; Sillesen, Henrik Hegaard; Eiberg, Jones Peter.

In: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2022, p. 283-292.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Zielinski, AH, Bredahl, KK, Ghulam, QM, Rouet, L, Dufour, C, Sillesen, HH & Eiberg, JP 2022, 'Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Improved-Field-of-View 3-D Ultrasound Performs Comparably to Computed Tomographic Angiography', Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.10.018

APA

Zielinski, A. H., Bredahl, K. K., Ghulam, Q. M., Rouet, L., Dufour, C., Sillesen, H. H., & Eiberg, J. P. (2022). Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Improved-Field-of-View 3-D Ultrasound Performs Comparably to Computed Tomographic Angiography. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 48(2), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.10.018

Vancouver

Zielinski AH, Bredahl KK, Ghulam QM, Rouet L, Dufour C, Sillesen HH et al. Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Improved-Field-of-View 3-D Ultrasound Performs Comparably to Computed Tomographic Angiography. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2022;48(2):283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.10.018

Author

Zielinski, Alexander Hakon ; Bredahl, Kim Kargaard ; Ghulam, Qasam Mohammed ; Rouet, Laurence ; Dufour, Cecile ; Sillesen, Henrik Hegaard ; Eiberg, Jones Peter. / Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Improved-Field-of-View 3-D Ultrasound Performs Comparably to Computed Tomographic Angiography. In: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2022 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 283-292.

Bibtex

@article{d5d71dbb7bc845609acca9ad4da3e7b1,
title = "Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Improved-Field-of-View 3-D Ultrasound Performs Comparably to Computed Tomographic Angiography",
abstract = "Three-dimensional ultrasound (US) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is limited by the field-of-view of the 3D-US transducer. To obtain an extended field-of-view (XFoV), two transducer navigation system-assisted US protocols have been developed: XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D. In this study, the XFoV US protocols were compared with the currently available 3D-US protocol with standard field-of-view (FoV-st) and the established gold standard, computed tomography angiography (CTA). A total of 65 patients with AAA were included, and AAA imaging was processed offline with prototype software. The novel XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D protocols allowed for assessment of full AAA volume in significantly more patients (45/65 [69%] and 43/65 [66%], respectively), compared with the current 3D-US standard, FoV-st (30/65 [46%] patients). The mean difference in AAA volume estimation between each XFoV US protocol and 3-D CTA differed significantly (XFoV-2D: 16.9 mL, XFoV-3D: 7.6 mL, p = 0.002), indicating that XFoV-3D agreed best with 3D-CTA. No significant difference was found in the variance of full AAA volume quantification between each XFoV US protocol and CTA (p = 0.49). It is concluded that the XFoV US protocols improved the generation of full AAA volumes compared with the currently available 3D-US technology, with AAA volume estimates comparable to CTA estimates.",
keywords = "Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Magnetic tracking-assisted ultrasound, Three-dimensional ultrasound, Transducer navigation system, Volume assessment",
author = "Zielinski, {Alexander Hakon} and Bredahl, {Kim Kargaard} and Ghulam, {Qasam Mohammed} and Laurence Rouet and Cecile Dufour and Sillesen, {Henrik Hegaard} and Eiberg, {Jones Peter}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.10.018",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "283--292",
journal = "Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology",
issn = "0301-5629",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Full-Volume Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Improved-Field-of-View 3-D Ultrasound Performs Comparably to Computed Tomographic Angiography

AU - Zielinski, Alexander Hakon

AU - Bredahl, Kim Kargaard

AU - Ghulam, Qasam Mohammed

AU - Rouet, Laurence

AU - Dufour, Cecile

AU - Sillesen, Henrik Hegaard

AU - Eiberg, Jones Peter

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Three-dimensional ultrasound (US) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is limited by the field-of-view of the 3D-US transducer. To obtain an extended field-of-view (XFoV), two transducer navigation system-assisted US protocols have been developed: XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D. In this study, the XFoV US protocols were compared with the currently available 3D-US protocol with standard field-of-view (FoV-st) and the established gold standard, computed tomography angiography (CTA). A total of 65 patients with AAA were included, and AAA imaging was processed offline with prototype software. The novel XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D protocols allowed for assessment of full AAA volume in significantly more patients (45/65 [69%] and 43/65 [66%], respectively), compared with the current 3D-US standard, FoV-st (30/65 [46%] patients). The mean difference in AAA volume estimation between each XFoV US protocol and 3-D CTA differed significantly (XFoV-2D: 16.9 mL, XFoV-3D: 7.6 mL, p = 0.002), indicating that XFoV-3D agreed best with 3D-CTA. No significant difference was found in the variance of full AAA volume quantification between each XFoV US protocol and CTA (p = 0.49). It is concluded that the XFoV US protocols improved the generation of full AAA volumes compared with the currently available 3D-US technology, with AAA volume estimates comparable to CTA estimates.

AB - Three-dimensional ultrasound (US) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is limited by the field-of-view of the 3D-US transducer. To obtain an extended field-of-view (XFoV), two transducer navigation system-assisted US protocols have been developed: XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D. In this study, the XFoV US protocols were compared with the currently available 3D-US protocol with standard field-of-view (FoV-st) and the established gold standard, computed tomography angiography (CTA). A total of 65 patients with AAA were included, and AAA imaging was processed offline with prototype software. The novel XFoV-2D and XFoV-3D protocols allowed for assessment of full AAA volume in significantly more patients (45/65 [69%] and 43/65 [66%], respectively), compared with the current 3D-US standard, FoV-st (30/65 [46%] patients). The mean difference in AAA volume estimation between each XFoV US protocol and 3-D CTA differed significantly (XFoV-2D: 16.9 mL, XFoV-3D: 7.6 mL, p = 0.002), indicating that XFoV-3D agreed best with 3D-CTA. No significant difference was found in the variance of full AAA volume quantification between each XFoV US protocol and CTA (p = 0.49). It is concluded that the XFoV US protocols improved the generation of full AAA volumes compared with the currently available 3D-US technology, with AAA volume estimates comparable to CTA estimates.

KW - Abdominal aortic aneurysm

KW - Magnetic tracking-assisted ultrasound

KW - Three-dimensional ultrasound

KW - Transducer navigation system

KW - Volume assessment

U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.10.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.10.018

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34823944

AN - SCOPUS:85119597821

VL - 48

SP - 283

EP - 292

JO - Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

JF - Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

SN - 0301-5629

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 285872889