Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts: Involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts : Involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters. / Briefer, Elodie F.; Vizier, Emilie; Gygax, Lorenz; Hillmann, Edna.

In: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 145, No. 5, 2895, 05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Briefer, EF, Vizier, E, Gygax, L & Hillmann, E 2019, 'Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts: Involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters', The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 145, no. 5, 2895. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5100612

APA

Briefer, E. F., Vizier, E., Gygax, L., & Hillmann, E. (2019). Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts: Involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(5), [2895]. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5100612

Vancouver

Briefer EF, Vizier E, Gygax L, Hillmann E. Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts: Involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2019 May;145(5). 2895. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5100612

Author

Briefer, Elodie F. ; Vizier, Emilie ; Gygax, Lorenz ; Hillmann, Edna. / Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts : Involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters. In: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2019 ; Vol. 145, No. 5.

Bibtex

@article{e5848268499d41eababa718611839346,
title = "Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts: Involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters",
abstract = "Emotion expression plays a crucial role for regulating social interactions. One efficient channel for emotion communication is the vocal-auditory channel, which enables a fast transmission of information. Filter-related parameters (formants) have been suggested as a key to the vocal differentiation of emotional valence (positive versus negative) across species, but variation in relation to emotions has rarely been investigated. Here, whether pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) closed-mouth grunts differ in source- and filter-related features when produced in situations assumed to be positive and negative is investigated. Behavioral and physiological parameters were used to validate the animals' emotional state (both in terms of valence and arousal, i.e., bodily activation). Results revealed that grunts produced in a positive situation were characterized by higher formants, a narrower range of the third formant, a shorter duration, a lower fundamental frequency, and a lower harmonicity compared to negative grunts. Particularly, formant-related parameters and duration made up most of the difference between positive and negative grunts. Therefore, these parameters have the potential to encode dynamic information and to vary as a function of the emotional valence of the emitter in pigs, and possibly in other mammals as well.",
author = "Briefer, {Elodie F.} and Emilie Vizier and Lorenz Gygax and Edna Hillmann",
year = "2019",
month = may,
doi = "10.1121/1.5100612",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
journal = "Acoustical Society of America. Journal",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "A I P Publishing LLC",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts

T2 - Involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters

AU - Briefer, Elodie F.

AU - Vizier, Emilie

AU - Gygax, Lorenz

AU - Hillmann, Edna

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Emotion expression plays a crucial role for regulating social interactions. One efficient channel for emotion communication is the vocal-auditory channel, which enables a fast transmission of information. Filter-related parameters (formants) have been suggested as a key to the vocal differentiation of emotional valence (positive versus negative) across species, but variation in relation to emotions has rarely been investigated. Here, whether pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) closed-mouth grunts differ in source- and filter-related features when produced in situations assumed to be positive and negative is investigated. Behavioral and physiological parameters were used to validate the animals' emotional state (both in terms of valence and arousal, i.e., bodily activation). Results revealed that grunts produced in a positive situation were characterized by higher formants, a narrower range of the third formant, a shorter duration, a lower fundamental frequency, and a lower harmonicity compared to negative grunts. Particularly, formant-related parameters and duration made up most of the difference between positive and negative grunts. Therefore, these parameters have the potential to encode dynamic information and to vary as a function of the emotional valence of the emitter in pigs, and possibly in other mammals as well.

AB - Emotion expression plays a crucial role for regulating social interactions. One efficient channel for emotion communication is the vocal-auditory channel, which enables a fast transmission of information. Filter-related parameters (formants) have been suggested as a key to the vocal differentiation of emotional valence (positive versus negative) across species, but variation in relation to emotions has rarely been investigated. Here, whether pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) closed-mouth grunts differ in source- and filter-related features when produced in situations assumed to be positive and negative is investigated. Behavioral and physiological parameters were used to validate the animals' emotional state (both in terms of valence and arousal, i.e., bodily activation). Results revealed that grunts produced in a positive situation were characterized by higher formants, a narrower range of the third formant, a shorter duration, a lower fundamental frequency, and a lower harmonicity compared to negative grunts. Particularly, formant-related parameters and duration made up most of the difference between positive and negative grunts. Therefore, these parameters have the potential to encode dynamic information and to vary as a function of the emotional valence of the emitter in pigs, and possibly in other mammals as well.

U2 - 10.1121/1.5100612

DO - 10.1121/1.5100612

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31153321

VL - 145

JO - Acoustical Society of America. Journal

JF - Acoustical Society of America. Journal

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 5

M1 - 2895

ER -

ID: 226786789