Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders. / Kessing, L. V.; Andersen, P. K.

In: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 135, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 51–64.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Kessing, LV & Andersen, PK 2017, 'Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders', Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12667

APA

Kessing, L. V., & Andersen, P. K. (2017). Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 135(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12667

Vancouver

Kessing LV, Andersen PK. Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2017 Jan;135(1):51–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12667

Author

Kessing, L. V. ; Andersen, P. K. / Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders. In: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2017 ; Vol. 135, No. 1. pp. 51–64.

Bibtex

@article{96c9c53330f144cfac01b3f962fbc77a,
title = "Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders",
abstract = "Objective: It is a widely held belief that affective disorders are progressive of nature; however, some recent reviews have questioned this belief. The objective of the present systematic literature review was to present evidence for associations between number of affective episodes and (i) the risk of recurrence of episodes, (ii) probability of recovery from episodes, (iii) severity of episodes, (iv) the threshold for developing episodes, and (v) progression of cognitive deficits in unipolar and bipolar disorders.Method: A systematic review comprising an extensive literature search conducted in Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo up to September 2016 and including cross-references from identified papers and reviews.Results: Most of the five areas are superficially investigated and hampered by methodological challenges. Nevertheless, studies with the longest follow-up periods, using survival analysis methods, taking account of the individual heterogeneity all support a clinical progressive course of illness. Overall, increasing number of affective episodes seems to be associated with (i) increasing risk of recurrence, (ii) increasing duration of episodes, (iii) increasing symptomatic severity of episodes, (iv) decreasing threshold for developing episodes, and (v) increasing risk of developing dementia.Conclusion: Although the course of illness is heterogeneous, there is evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders.",
author = "Kessing, {L. V.} and Andersen, {P. K.}",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/acps.12667",
language = "English",
volume = "135",
pages = "51–64",
journal = "Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-690X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders

AU - Kessing, L. V.

AU - Andersen, P. K.

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Objective: It is a widely held belief that affective disorders are progressive of nature; however, some recent reviews have questioned this belief. The objective of the present systematic literature review was to present evidence for associations between number of affective episodes and (i) the risk of recurrence of episodes, (ii) probability of recovery from episodes, (iii) severity of episodes, (iv) the threshold for developing episodes, and (v) progression of cognitive deficits in unipolar and bipolar disorders.Method: A systematic review comprising an extensive literature search conducted in Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo up to September 2016 and including cross-references from identified papers and reviews.Results: Most of the five areas are superficially investigated and hampered by methodological challenges. Nevertheless, studies with the longest follow-up periods, using survival analysis methods, taking account of the individual heterogeneity all support a clinical progressive course of illness. Overall, increasing number of affective episodes seems to be associated with (i) increasing risk of recurrence, (ii) increasing duration of episodes, (iii) increasing symptomatic severity of episodes, (iv) decreasing threshold for developing episodes, and (v) increasing risk of developing dementia.Conclusion: Although the course of illness is heterogeneous, there is evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders.

AB - Objective: It is a widely held belief that affective disorders are progressive of nature; however, some recent reviews have questioned this belief. The objective of the present systematic literature review was to present evidence for associations between number of affective episodes and (i) the risk of recurrence of episodes, (ii) probability of recovery from episodes, (iii) severity of episodes, (iv) the threshold for developing episodes, and (v) progression of cognitive deficits in unipolar and bipolar disorders.Method: A systematic review comprising an extensive literature search conducted in Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo up to September 2016 and including cross-references from identified papers and reviews.Results: Most of the five areas are superficially investigated and hampered by methodological challenges. Nevertheless, studies with the longest follow-up periods, using survival analysis methods, taking account of the individual heterogeneity all support a clinical progressive course of illness. Overall, increasing number of affective episodes seems to be associated with (i) increasing risk of recurrence, (ii) increasing duration of episodes, (iii) increasing symptomatic severity of episodes, (iv) decreasing threshold for developing episodes, and (v) increasing risk of developing dementia.Conclusion: Although the course of illness is heterogeneous, there is evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders.

U2 - 10.1111/acps.12667

DO - 10.1111/acps.12667

M3 - Review

C2 - 27858964

VL - 135

SP - 51

EP - 64

JO - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-690X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 169076295