Everyday trajectories of hearing correction

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Everyday trajectories of hearing correction. / Hindhede, Anette.

In: Health Sociology Review, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.12.2010, p. 382-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hindhede, A 2010, 'Everyday trajectories of hearing correction', Health Sociology Review, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 382-394. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2010.19.3.382

APA

Hindhede, A. (2010). Everyday trajectories of hearing correction. Health Sociology Review, 19(3), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2010.19.3.382

Vancouver

Hindhede A. Everyday trajectories of hearing correction. Health Sociology Review. 2010 Dec 1;19(3):382-394. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2010.19.3.382

Author

Hindhede, Anette. / Everyday trajectories of hearing correction. In: Health Sociology Review. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 382-394.

Bibtex

@article{e0fa4de1d70f40fbbb96d5890cdf10be,
title = "Everyday trajectories of hearing correction",
abstract = "This paper reports on a qualitative study of the onset of acquired hearing impairment. The focus of attention is why a person seeks treatment. The Danish welfare state serves the population 'in need' such as those with an audiological need and gives them guidance on becoming hearing aid wearers in order to rehabilitate them back to 'normalcy'. However, within audiological research, noncompliance has attracted much attention as investigations have shown that more than 20 percent of hearing aids are very seldom, if ever, in use and 19 percent are used only occasionally. As shown in the paper the form a problem takes is in large part a product of micro-potitical struggles. Hence, at the onset 'need' is often embedded in social pressure from significant others. The paper examines these two discursive frameworks and their constitution of (hearing) problems and concludes that norms of disease are complex and epistemologically contested and can help explain why noncompliance is dominant when it comes to hearing rehabilitation for hearing impaired adults.",
author = "Anette Hindhede",
year = "2010",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5172/hesr.2010.19.3.382",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "382--394",
journal = "Health Sociology Review",
issn = "1446-1242",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Everyday trajectories of hearing correction

AU - Hindhede, Anette

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - This paper reports on a qualitative study of the onset of acquired hearing impairment. The focus of attention is why a person seeks treatment. The Danish welfare state serves the population 'in need' such as those with an audiological need and gives them guidance on becoming hearing aid wearers in order to rehabilitate them back to 'normalcy'. However, within audiological research, noncompliance has attracted much attention as investigations have shown that more than 20 percent of hearing aids are very seldom, if ever, in use and 19 percent are used only occasionally. As shown in the paper the form a problem takes is in large part a product of micro-potitical struggles. Hence, at the onset 'need' is often embedded in social pressure from significant others. The paper examines these two discursive frameworks and their constitution of (hearing) problems and concludes that norms of disease are complex and epistemologically contested and can help explain why noncompliance is dominant when it comes to hearing rehabilitation for hearing impaired adults.

AB - This paper reports on a qualitative study of the onset of acquired hearing impairment. The focus of attention is why a person seeks treatment. The Danish welfare state serves the population 'in need' such as those with an audiological need and gives them guidance on becoming hearing aid wearers in order to rehabilitate them back to 'normalcy'. However, within audiological research, noncompliance has attracted much attention as investigations have shown that more than 20 percent of hearing aids are very seldom, if ever, in use and 19 percent are used only occasionally. As shown in the paper the form a problem takes is in large part a product of micro-potitical struggles. Hence, at the onset 'need' is often embedded in social pressure from significant others. The paper examines these two discursive frameworks and their constitution of (hearing) problems and concludes that norms of disease are complex and epistemologically contested and can help explain why noncompliance is dominant when it comes to hearing rehabilitation for hearing impaired adults.

U2 - 10.5172/hesr.2010.19.3.382

DO - 10.5172/hesr.2010.19.3.382

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 382

EP - 394

JO - Health Sociology Review

JF - Health Sociology Review

SN - 1446-1242

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 317089436