Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. / Orskov, Bjarne; Borresen, Malene L; Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo; Østergaard, Ole; Laursen, Inga; Strandgaard, Svend; Ørskov, Bjarne; Borresen, Malene L; Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo; Østergaard, Ole; Laursen, Inga; Strandgaard, Svend Valdemar.
In: American Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 53-7.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
AU - Orskov, Bjarne
AU - Borresen, Malene L
AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo
AU - Østergaard, Ole
AU - Laursen, Inga
AU - Strandgaard, Svend
AU - Ørskov, Bjarne
AU - Borresen, Malene L
AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo
AU - Østergaard, Ole
AU - Laursen, Inga
AU - Strandgaard, Svend Valdemar
N1 - Keywords: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Mathematics; Middle Aged; Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant; Reproducibility of Results; Young Adult
PY - 2010/1/1
Y1 - 2010/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: No studies have compared the performance of equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), where the declining GFR typically is followed for many years or even decades. This was the purpose of the present investigation. METHODS: 101 ADPKD patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-5 were recruited and GFR was measured with the (51)Cr-EDTA clearance method, and estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) equation with 4 variables, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, the Cockcroft-Gault equation adjusted for body surface area and the MDRD equation with cystatin C. Performance was evaluated by mean bias, precision and accuracy. RESULTS: The MDRD equation with cystatin C had 97% of GFR estimates within 30% of measured GFR (accuracy). Both the CKD-EPI and Cockcroft-Gault equations had an accuracy of 90% whereas the MDRD equation had an accuracy of 83%. This difference of accuracy was especially marked with GFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). CONCLUSION: For estimating GFR in ADPKD patients the MDRD equation with cystatin C incorporated had the best performance. The CKD-EPI or the Cockcroft-Gault equations showed better performance compared to the 4-variable MDRD equation.
AB - BACKGROUND: No studies have compared the performance of equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), where the declining GFR typically is followed for many years or even decades. This was the purpose of the present investigation. METHODS: 101 ADPKD patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-5 were recruited and GFR was measured with the (51)Cr-EDTA clearance method, and estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) equation with 4 variables, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, the Cockcroft-Gault equation adjusted for body surface area and the MDRD equation with cystatin C. Performance was evaluated by mean bias, precision and accuracy. RESULTS: The MDRD equation with cystatin C had 97% of GFR estimates within 30% of measured GFR (accuracy). Both the CKD-EPI and Cockcroft-Gault equations had an accuracy of 90% whereas the MDRD equation had an accuracy of 83%. This difference of accuracy was especially marked with GFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). CONCLUSION: For estimating GFR in ADPKD patients the MDRD equation with cystatin C incorporated had the best performance. The CKD-EPI or the Cockcroft-Gault equations showed better performance compared to the 4-variable MDRD equation.
U2 - 10.1159/000256657
DO - 10.1159/000256657
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19887788
VL - 31
SP - 53
EP - 57
JO - American Journal of Nephrology
JF - American Journal of Nephrology
SN - 0250-8095
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 18788425