Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. / Orskov, Bjarne; Borresen, Malene L; Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo; Østergaard, Ole; Laursen, Inga; Strandgaard, Svend; Ørskov, Bjarne; Borresen, Malene L; Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo; Østergaard, Ole; Laursen, Inga; Strandgaard, Svend Valdemar.

In: American Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 53-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Orskov, B, Borresen, ML, Feldt-Rasmussen, B, Østergaard, O, Laursen, I, Strandgaard, S, Ørskov, B, Borresen, ML, Feldt-Rasmussen, B, Østergaard, O, Laursen, I & Strandgaard, SV 2010, 'Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease', American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000256657, https://doi.org/10.1159/000256657

APA

Orskov, B., Borresen, M. L., Feldt-Rasmussen, B., Østergaard, O., Laursen, I., Strandgaard, S., Ørskov, B., Borresen, M. L., Feldt-Rasmussen, B., Østergaard, O., Laursen, I., & Strandgaard, S. V. (2010). Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. American Journal of Nephrology, 31(1), 53-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000256657, https://doi.org/10.1159/000256657

Vancouver

Orskov B, Borresen ML, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Østergaard O, Laursen I, Strandgaard S et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. American Journal of Nephrology. 2010 Jan 1;31(1):53-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000256657, https://doi.org/10.1159/000256657

Author

Orskov, Bjarne ; Borresen, Malene L ; Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo ; Østergaard, Ole ; Laursen, Inga ; Strandgaard, Svend ; Ørskov, Bjarne ; Borresen, Malene L ; Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo ; Østergaard, Ole ; Laursen, Inga ; Strandgaard, Svend Valdemar. / Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. In: American Journal of Nephrology. 2010 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 53-7.

Bibtex

@article{bfbed970367a11df8ed1000ea68e967b,
title = "Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: No studies have compared the performance of equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), where the declining GFR typically is followed for many years or even decades. This was the purpose of the present investigation. METHODS: 101 ADPKD patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-5 were recruited and GFR was measured with the (51)Cr-EDTA clearance method, and estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) equation with 4 variables, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, the Cockcroft-Gault equation adjusted for body surface area and the MDRD equation with cystatin C. Performance was evaluated by mean bias, precision and accuracy. RESULTS: The MDRD equation with cystatin C had 97% of GFR estimates within 30% of measured GFR (accuracy). Both the CKD-EPI and Cockcroft-Gault equations had an accuracy of 90% whereas the MDRD equation had an accuracy of 83%. This difference of accuracy was especially marked with GFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). CONCLUSION: For estimating GFR in ADPKD patients the MDRD equation with cystatin C incorporated had the best performance. The CKD-EPI or the Cockcroft-Gault equations showed better performance compared to the 4-variable MDRD equation.",
author = "Bjarne Orskov and Borresen, {Malene L} and Bo Feldt-Rasmussen and Ole {\O}stergaard and Inga Laursen and Svend Strandgaard and Bjarne {\O}rskov and Borresen, {Malene L} and Bo Feldt-Rasmussen and Ole {\O}stergaard and Inga Laursen and Strandgaard, {Svend Valdemar}",
note = "Keywords: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Mathematics; Middle Aged; Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant; Reproducibility of Results; Young Adult",
year = "2010",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000256657",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "53--7",
journal = "American Journal of Nephrology",
issn = "0250-8095",
publisher = "S Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating glomerular filtration rate using the new CKD-EPI equation and other equations in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

AU - Orskov, Bjarne

AU - Borresen, Malene L

AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo

AU - Østergaard, Ole

AU - Laursen, Inga

AU - Strandgaard, Svend

AU - Ørskov, Bjarne

AU - Borresen, Malene L

AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo

AU - Østergaard, Ole

AU - Laursen, Inga

AU - Strandgaard, Svend Valdemar

N1 - Keywords: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Mathematics; Middle Aged; Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant; Reproducibility of Results; Young Adult

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: No studies have compared the performance of equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), where the declining GFR typically is followed for many years or even decades. This was the purpose of the present investigation. METHODS: 101 ADPKD patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-5 were recruited and GFR was measured with the (51)Cr-EDTA clearance method, and estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) equation with 4 variables, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, the Cockcroft-Gault equation adjusted for body surface area and the MDRD equation with cystatin C. Performance was evaluated by mean bias, precision and accuracy. RESULTS: The MDRD equation with cystatin C had 97% of GFR estimates within 30% of measured GFR (accuracy). Both the CKD-EPI and Cockcroft-Gault equations had an accuracy of 90% whereas the MDRD equation had an accuracy of 83%. This difference of accuracy was especially marked with GFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). CONCLUSION: For estimating GFR in ADPKD patients the MDRD equation with cystatin C incorporated had the best performance. The CKD-EPI or the Cockcroft-Gault equations showed better performance compared to the 4-variable MDRD equation.

AB - BACKGROUND: No studies have compared the performance of equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), where the declining GFR typically is followed for many years or even decades. This was the purpose of the present investigation. METHODS: 101 ADPKD patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-5 were recruited and GFR was measured with the (51)Cr-EDTA clearance method, and estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) equation with 4 variables, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, the Cockcroft-Gault equation adjusted for body surface area and the MDRD equation with cystatin C. Performance was evaluated by mean bias, precision and accuracy. RESULTS: The MDRD equation with cystatin C had 97% of GFR estimates within 30% of measured GFR (accuracy). Both the CKD-EPI and Cockcroft-Gault equations had an accuracy of 90% whereas the MDRD equation had an accuracy of 83%. This difference of accuracy was especially marked with GFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). CONCLUSION: For estimating GFR in ADPKD patients the MDRD equation with cystatin C incorporated had the best performance. The CKD-EPI or the Cockcroft-Gault equations showed better performance compared to the 4-variable MDRD equation.

U2 - 10.1159/000256657

DO - 10.1159/000256657

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 19887788

VL - 31

SP - 53

EP - 57

JO - American Journal of Nephrology

JF - American Journal of Nephrology

SN - 0250-8095

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 18788425