Discriminatory types and homogenising relevances: A Schutzian perspective on oppression

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Discriminatory types and homogenising relevances : A Schutzian perspective on oppression. / Hedges, Tris; De Biasio, Sabrina.

In: Human Studies, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hedges, T & De Biasio, S 2024, 'Discriminatory types and homogenising relevances: A Schutzian perspective on oppression', Human Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09725-6

APA

Hedges, T., & De Biasio, S. (2024). Discriminatory types and homogenising relevances: A Schutzian perspective on oppression. Human Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09725-6

Vancouver

Hedges T, De Biasio S. Discriminatory types and homogenising relevances: A Schutzian perspective on oppression. Human Studies. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-024-09725-6

Author

Hedges, Tris ; De Biasio, Sabrina. / Discriminatory types and homogenising relevances : A Schutzian perspective on oppression. In: Human Studies. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{eb3de6bb8c74466db9a64fbdc3547c0b,
title = "Discriminatory types and homogenising relevances: A Schutzian perspective on oppression",
abstract = "In this paper, we draw on Alfred Schutz{\textquoteright}s theoretical framework to better understand how oppression is enacted through discriminatory acts. By closely examining the role of typifications and relevances in our experience of others, and by supplementing this analysis with contemporary social scientific resources, we argue that a Schutzian perspective on oppression yields important phenomenological insights. We do this in three key steps. Firstly, we contextualise Equality and the Meaning Structure of the Social World within Schutz{\textquoteright}s broader body of work, elucidating his central conditions of discrimination. Secondly, we highlight the limitations of Schutz{\textquoteright}s account, in how it fails to capture more peripheral, subtle, and implicit oppressive practices. Finally, we introduce two underexplored insights derived from Schutz{\textquoteright}s framework: the role of relevances in understanding the motivational underpinnings of implicit biases, and the connection between self-typification and stereotype threat. With this multidimensional approach, we hope to enhance our understanding of oppression whilst bridging gaps in Schutz{\textquoteright}s original conceptualization.",
author = "Tris Hedges and {De Biasio}, Sabrina",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1007/s10746-024-09725-6",
language = "English",
journal = "Human Studies",
issn = "0163-8548",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discriminatory types and homogenising relevances

T2 - A Schutzian perspective on oppression

AU - Hedges, Tris

AU - De Biasio, Sabrina

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - In this paper, we draw on Alfred Schutz’s theoretical framework to better understand how oppression is enacted through discriminatory acts. By closely examining the role of typifications and relevances in our experience of others, and by supplementing this analysis with contemporary social scientific resources, we argue that a Schutzian perspective on oppression yields important phenomenological insights. We do this in three key steps. Firstly, we contextualise Equality and the Meaning Structure of the Social World within Schutz’s broader body of work, elucidating his central conditions of discrimination. Secondly, we highlight the limitations of Schutz’s account, in how it fails to capture more peripheral, subtle, and implicit oppressive practices. Finally, we introduce two underexplored insights derived from Schutz’s framework: the role of relevances in understanding the motivational underpinnings of implicit biases, and the connection between self-typification and stereotype threat. With this multidimensional approach, we hope to enhance our understanding of oppression whilst bridging gaps in Schutz’s original conceptualization.

AB - In this paper, we draw on Alfred Schutz’s theoretical framework to better understand how oppression is enacted through discriminatory acts. By closely examining the role of typifications and relevances in our experience of others, and by supplementing this analysis with contemporary social scientific resources, we argue that a Schutzian perspective on oppression yields important phenomenological insights. We do this in three key steps. Firstly, we contextualise Equality and the Meaning Structure of the Social World within Schutz’s broader body of work, elucidating his central conditions of discrimination. Secondly, we highlight the limitations of Schutz’s account, in how it fails to capture more peripheral, subtle, and implicit oppressive practices. Finally, we introduce two underexplored insights derived from Schutz’s framework: the role of relevances in understanding the motivational underpinnings of implicit biases, and the connection between self-typification and stereotype threat. With this multidimensional approach, we hope to enhance our understanding of oppression whilst bridging gaps in Schutz’s original conceptualization.

U2 - 10.1007/s10746-024-09725-6

DO - 10.1007/s10746-024-09725-6

M3 - Journal article

JO - Human Studies

JF - Human Studies

SN - 0163-8548

ER -

ID: 390190475