Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Standard
Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations. / Gauffriau, Marianne; Larsen, Peder Olesen.
Proceedings of ISSI 2005: : 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Vol. 1 2005. p. 242-246.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations
AU - Gauffriau, Marianne
AU - Larsen, Peder Olesen
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - For all rankings of countries research output based on number of publications, citations or most cited publications compared with population, GDP, R&D expenses and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Using data freely available the difference between numbers of publications based on Total Counting and Fractional Counting has been quantified. Reduction in numbers of publications going from Total to Fractional Counting ranges from 10 to 45 per cent for different countries. Rankings based on numbers of citations or highly cited papers most likely are even more dependent on the counting method used. Counting methods are in many cases not precisely described or discussed.
AB - For all rankings of countries research output based on number of publications, citations or most cited publications compared with population, GDP, R&D expenses and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Using data freely available the difference between numbers of publications based on Total Counting and Fractional Counting has been quantified. Reduction in numbers of publications going from Total to Fractional Counting ranges from 10 to 45 per cent for different countries. Rankings based on numbers of citations or highly cited papers most likely are even more dependent on the counting method used. Counting methods are in many cases not precisely described or discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55049141992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article in proceedings
AN - SCOPUS:55049141992
SN - 9789171403391
VL - 1
SP - 242
EP - 246
BT - Proceedings of ISSI 2005
T2 - 10th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2005
Y2 - 24 July 2005 through 28 July 2005
ER -
ID: 160529094