Detailing profiles of Lawsonia intracellularis specific lymphocytes in the immune response to a challenge inoculation after oral vaccination or primary inoculation with virulent bacteria

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Standard

Detailing profiles of Lawsonia intracellularis specific lymphocytes in the immune response to a challenge inoculation after oral vaccination or primary inoculation with virulent bacteria. / Riber, Ulla; Hvass, Henriette Cordes; Heegaard, Peter; Ståhl, Marie; Jensen, Tim Kåre; Jungersen, Gregers.

Abstract book. 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Riber, U, Hvass, HC, Heegaard, P, Ståhl, M, Jensen, TK & Jungersen, G 2012, Detailing profiles of Lawsonia intracellularis specific lymphocytes in the immune response to a challenge inoculation after oral vaccination or primary inoculation with virulent bacteria. in Abstract book.

APA

Riber, U., Hvass, H. C., Heegaard, P., Ståhl, M., Jensen, T. K., & Jungersen, G. (2012). Detailing profiles of Lawsonia intracellularis specific lymphocytes in the immune response to a challenge inoculation after oral vaccination or primary inoculation with virulent bacteria. In Abstract book

Vancouver

Riber U, Hvass HC, Heegaard P, Ståhl M, Jensen TK, Jungersen G. Detailing profiles of Lawsonia intracellularis specific lymphocytes in the immune response to a challenge inoculation after oral vaccination or primary inoculation with virulent bacteria. In Abstract book. 2012

Author

Riber, Ulla ; Hvass, Henriette Cordes ; Heegaard, Peter ; Ståhl, Marie ; Jensen, Tim Kåre ; Jungersen, Gregers. / Detailing profiles of Lawsonia intracellularis specific lymphocytes in the immune response to a challenge inoculation after oral vaccination or primary inoculation with virulent bacteria. Abstract book. 2012.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{71f7bc2d78b34eb980389d5a764b98e6,
title = "Detailing profiles of Lawsonia intracellularis specific lymphocytes in the immune response to a challenge inoculation after oral vaccination or primary inoculation with virulent bacteria",
abstract = "Vaccination against the intracellular porcine enteric pathogen Lawsonia intracellularis remains a challenge as the commercially available vaccine does not provide full protection. In an experimental challenge study, the Enterisol{\textregistered} Ileitis attenuated live vaccine against Lawsonia intracellularis did not induce measurable primary humoral or cell-mediated immune responses, nor was it able to reduce faecal shedding of bacteria from eight vaccinated pigs compared to seven age-matched na{\"i}ve challenge-control pigs. Vaccinated pigs did, however, respond to vaccination with an acute phase protein response in serum comparable to that of ten primary infected (and later re-inoculated) pigs, and post mortem immunohistochemical examination of tissue samples revealed less L. intracellularis in vaccinated pigs compared to challenge-control pigs.In more detailed studies of the immune response after challenge, the vaccinated pigs did not show any immediate evidence of primed (faster or stronger) IgG or CMI response compared to na{\"i}ve pigs. L. intracellularis-specific CMI responses 18-33 dpi were further characterized by flow cytometry for intracellular IFN-γ and cell proliferation (CFSE). Phenotypes of IFN-γ producing cells in the vaccinated pigs showed profiles primarily of CD8+(CD4neg) and CD4+CD8+ double positive lymphocytes. Similar profiles of IFN-γ producing cells were found in re-inoculated immune pigs, which experienced a boost in CMI responses. Cellular proliferation was identified in nearly all vaccinated pigs with mainly CD4+(CD8neg) and CD4+CD8+ double positive cells, whereas the immune re-inoculated pigs also included response in CD8high(CD4neg) cells. These different profiles of responsive cellular phenotypes may influence the observed differences in protection between vaccinated and re-inoculated pigs.",
author = "Ulla Riber and Hvass, {Henriette Cordes} and Peter Heegaard and Marie St{\aa}hl and Jensen, {Tim K{\aa}re} and Gregers Jungersen",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Abstract book",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Detailing profiles of Lawsonia intracellularis specific lymphocytes in the immune response to a challenge inoculation after oral vaccination or primary inoculation with virulent bacteria

AU - Riber, Ulla

AU - Hvass, Henriette Cordes

AU - Heegaard, Peter

AU - Ståhl, Marie

AU - Jensen, Tim Kåre

AU - Jungersen, Gregers

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Vaccination against the intracellular porcine enteric pathogen Lawsonia intracellularis remains a challenge as the commercially available vaccine does not provide full protection. In an experimental challenge study, the Enterisol® Ileitis attenuated live vaccine against Lawsonia intracellularis did not induce measurable primary humoral or cell-mediated immune responses, nor was it able to reduce faecal shedding of bacteria from eight vaccinated pigs compared to seven age-matched naïve challenge-control pigs. Vaccinated pigs did, however, respond to vaccination with an acute phase protein response in serum comparable to that of ten primary infected (and later re-inoculated) pigs, and post mortem immunohistochemical examination of tissue samples revealed less L. intracellularis in vaccinated pigs compared to challenge-control pigs.In more detailed studies of the immune response after challenge, the vaccinated pigs did not show any immediate evidence of primed (faster or stronger) IgG or CMI response compared to naïve pigs. L. intracellularis-specific CMI responses 18-33 dpi were further characterized by flow cytometry for intracellular IFN-γ and cell proliferation (CFSE). Phenotypes of IFN-γ producing cells in the vaccinated pigs showed profiles primarily of CD8+(CD4neg) and CD4+CD8+ double positive lymphocytes. Similar profiles of IFN-γ producing cells were found in re-inoculated immune pigs, which experienced a boost in CMI responses. Cellular proliferation was identified in nearly all vaccinated pigs with mainly CD4+(CD8neg) and CD4+CD8+ double positive cells, whereas the immune re-inoculated pigs also included response in CD8high(CD4neg) cells. These different profiles of responsive cellular phenotypes may influence the observed differences in protection between vaccinated and re-inoculated pigs.

AB - Vaccination against the intracellular porcine enteric pathogen Lawsonia intracellularis remains a challenge as the commercially available vaccine does not provide full protection. In an experimental challenge study, the Enterisol® Ileitis attenuated live vaccine against Lawsonia intracellularis did not induce measurable primary humoral or cell-mediated immune responses, nor was it able to reduce faecal shedding of bacteria from eight vaccinated pigs compared to seven age-matched naïve challenge-control pigs. Vaccinated pigs did, however, respond to vaccination with an acute phase protein response in serum comparable to that of ten primary infected (and later re-inoculated) pigs, and post mortem immunohistochemical examination of tissue samples revealed less L. intracellularis in vaccinated pigs compared to challenge-control pigs.In more detailed studies of the immune response after challenge, the vaccinated pigs did not show any immediate evidence of primed (faster or stronger) IgG or CMI response compared to naïve pigs. L. intracellularis-specific CMI responses 18-33 dpi were further characterized by flow cytometry for intracellular IFN-γ and cell proliferation (CFSE). Phenotypes of IFN-γ producing cells in the vaccinated pigs showed profiles primarily of CD8+(CD4neg) and CD4+CD8+ double positive lymphocytes. Similar profiles of IFN-γ producing cells were found in re-inoculated immune pigs, which experienced a boost in CMI responses. Cellular proliferation was identified in nearly all vaccinated pigs with mainly CD4+(CD8neg) and CD4+CD8+ double positive cells, whereas the immune re-inoculated pigs also included response in CD8high(CD4neg) cells. These different profiles of responsive cellular phenotypes may influence the observed differences in protection between vaccinated and re-inoculated pigs.

UR - https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/fe230235-12c3-4edd-bd55-9f136320dd35

M3 - Article in proceedings

BT - Abstract book

ER -

ID: 339246876