Climatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–bee interactions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Climatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–bee interactions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants. / Sydenham, Markus A.K.; Dupont, Yoko L.; Nielsen, Anders; Olesen, Jens M.; Madsen, Henning B.; Skrindo, Astrid B.; Rasmussen, Claus; Nowell, Megan S.; Venter, Zander S.; Hegland, Stein Joar; Helle, Anders G.; Skoog, Daniel I.J.; Torvanger, Marianne S.; Hanevik, Kaj Andreas; Hinderaker, Sven Emil; Paulsen, Thorstein; Eldegard, Katrine; Reitan, Trond; Rusch, Graciela M.

In: Ecography, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Sydenham, MAK, Dupont, YL, Nielsen, A, Olesen, JM, Madsen, HB, Skrindo, AB, Rasmussen, C, Nowell, MS, Venter, ZS, Hegland, SJ, Helle, AG, Skoog, DIJ, Torvanger, MS, Hanevik, KA, Hinderaker, SE, Paulsen, T, Eldegard, K, Reitan, T & Rusch, GM 2024, 'Climatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–bee interactions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants', Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07138

APA

Sydenham, M. A. K., Dupont, Y. L., Nielsen, A., Olesen, J. M., Madsen, H. B., Skrindo, A. B., Rasmussen, C., Nowell, M. S., Venter, Z. S., Hegland, S. J., Helle, A. G., Skoog, D. I. J., Torvanger, M. S., Hanevik, K. A., Hinderaker, S. E., Paulsen, T., Eldegard, K., Reitan, T., & Rusch, G. M. (2024). Climatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–bee interactions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants. Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07138

Vancouver

Sydenham MAK, Dupont YL, Nielsen A, Olesen JM, Madsen HB, Skrindo AB et al. Climatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–bee interactions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants. Ecography. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07138

Author

Sydenham, Markus A.K. ; Dupont, Yoko L. ; Nielsen, Anders ; Olesen, Jens M. ; Madsen, Henning B. ; Skrindo, Astrid B. ; Rasmussen, Claus ; Nowell, Megan S. ; Venter, Zander S. ; Hegland, Stein Joar ; Helle, Anders G. ; Skoog, Daniel I.J. ; Torvanger, Marianne S. ; Hanevik, Kaj Andreas ; Hinderaker, Sven Emil ; Paulsen, Thorstein ; Eldegard, Katrine ; Reitan, Trond ; Rusch, Graciela M. / Climatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–bee interactions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants. In: Ecography. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{6d2c2d0c59e7462daf85f95a4f07655d,
title = "Climatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–bee interactions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants",
abstract = "Climate change, landscape homogenization, and the decline of beneficial insects threaten pollination services to wild plants and crops. Understanding how pollination potential (i.e. the capacity of ecosystems to support pollination of plants) is affected by climate change and landscape homogenization is fundamental for our ability to predict how such anthropogenic stressors affect plant biodiversity. Models of pollinator potential are improved when based on pairwise plant–pollinator interactions and pollinator's plant preferences. However, whether the sum of predicted pairwise interactions with a plant within a habitat (a proxy for pollination potential) relates to pollen deposition on flowering plants has not yet been investigated. We sampled plant–bee interactions in 68 Scandinavian plant communities in landscapes of varying land-cover heterogeneity along a latitudinal temperature gradient of 4–8°C, and estimated pollen deposition as the number of pollen grains on flowers of the bee-pollinated plants Lotus corniculatus and Vicia cracca. We show that plant–bee interactions, and the pollination potential for these bee-pollinated plants increase with landscape diversity, annual mean temperature, and plant abundance, and decrease with distances to sand-dominated soils. Furthermore, the pollen deposition in flowers increased with the predicted pollination potential, which was driven by landscape diversity and plant abundance. Our study illustrates that the pollination potential, and thus pollen deposition, for wild plants can be mapped based on spatial models of plant–bee interactions that incorporate pollinator-specific plant preferences. Maps of pollination potential can be used to guide conservation and restoration planning.",
keywords = "ecological networks, ecosystem service mapping, landscape diversity, plant–pollinator interactions, pollination",
author = "Sydenham, {Markus A.K.} and Dupont, {Yoko L.} and Anders Nielsen and Olesen, {Jens M.} and Madsen, {Henning B.} and Skrindo, {Astrid B.} and Claus Rasmussen and Nowell, {Megan S.} and Venter, {Zander S.} and Hegland, {Stein Joar} and Helle, {Anders G.} and Skoog, {Daniel I.J.} and Torvanger, {Marianne S.} and Hanevik, {Kaj Andreas} and Hinderaker, {Sven Emil} and Thorstein Paulsen and Katrine Eldegard and Trond Reitan and Rusch, {Graciela M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors. Ecography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1111/ecog.07138",
language = "English",
journal = "Ecography",
issn = "0906-7590",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climatic conditions and landscape diversity predict plant–bee interactions and pollen deposition in bee-pollinated plants

AU - Sydenham, Markus A.K.

AU - Dupont, Yoko L.

AU - Nielsen, Anders

AU - Olesen, Jens M.

AU - Madsen, Henning B.

AU - Skrindo, Astrid B.

AU - Rasmussen, Claus

AU - Nowell, Megan S.

AU - Venter, Zander S.

AU - Hegland, Stein Joar

AU - Helle, Anders G.

AU - Skoog, Daniel I.J.

AU - Torvanger, Marianne S.

AU - Hanevik, Kaj Andreas

AU - Hinderaker, Sven Emil

AU - Paulsen, Thorstein

AU - Eldegard, Katrine

AU - Reitan, Trond

AU - Rusch, Graciela M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors. Ecography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Climate change, landscape homogenization, and the decline of beneficial insects threaten pollination services to wild plants and crops. Understanding how pollination potential (i.e. the capacity of ecosystems to support pollination of plants) is affected by climate change and landscape homogenization is fundamental for our ability to predict how such anthropogenic stressors affect plant biodiversity. Models of pollinator potential are improved when based on pairwise plant–pollinator interactions and pollinator's plant preferences. However, whether the sum of predicted pairwise interactions with a plant within a habitat (a proxy for pollination potential) relates to pollen deposition on flowering plants has not yet been investigated. We sampled plant–bee interactions in 68 Scandinavian plant communities in landscapes of varying land-cover heterogeneity along a latitudinal temperature gradient of 4–8°C, and estimated pollen deposition as the number of pollen grains on flowers of the bee-pollinated plants Lotus corniculatus and Vicia cracca. We show that plant–bee interactions, and the pollination potential for these bee-pollinated plants increase with landscape diversity, annual mean temperature, and plant abundance, and decrease with distances to sand-dominated soils. Furthermore, the pollen deposition in flowers increased with the predicted pollination potential, which was driven by landscape diversity and plant abundance. Our study illustrates that the pollination potential, and thus pollen deposition, for wild plants can be mapped based on spatial models of plant–bee interactions that incorporate pollinator-specific plant preferences. Maps of pollination potential can be used to guide conservation and restoration planning.

AB - Climate change, landscape homogenization, and the decline of beneficial insects threaten pollination services to wild plants and crops. Understanding how pollination potential (i.e. the capacity of ecosystems to support pollination of plants) is affected by climate change and landscape homogenization is fundamental for our ability to predict how such anthropogenic stressors affect plant biodiversity. Models of pollinator potential are improved when based on pairwise plant–pollinator interactions and pollinator's plant preferences. However, whether the sum of predicted pairwise interactions with a plant within a habitat (a proxy for pollination potential) relates to pollen deposition on flowering plants has not yet been investigated. We sampled plant–bee interactions in 68 Scandinavian plant communities in landscapes of varying land-cover heterogeneity along a latitudinal temperature gradient of 4–8°C, and estimated pollen deposition as the number of pollen grains on flowers of the bee-pollinated plants Lotus corniculatus and Vicia cracca. We show that plant–bee interactions, and the pollination potential for these bee-pollinated plants increase with landscape diversity, annual mean temperature, and plant abundance, and decrease with distances to sand-dominated soils. Furthermore, the pollen deposition in flowers increased with the predicted pollination potential, which was driven by landscape diversity and plant abundance. Our study illustrates that the pollination potential, and thus pollen deposition, for wild plants can be mapped based on spatial models of plant–bee interactions that incorporate pollinator-specific plant preferences. Maps of pollination potential can be used to guide conservation and restoration planning.

KW - ecological networks

KW - ecosystem service mapping

KW - landscape diversity

KW - plant–pollinator interactions

KW - pollination

U2 - 10.1111/ecog.07138

DO - 10.1111/ecog.07138

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85197245889

JO - Ecography

JF - Ecography

SN - 0906-7590

ER -

ID: 397800216