Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine: Article two in a series of ten
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine : Article two in a series of ten. / Comins, Jonathan D.; Brodersen, John; Siersma, Volkert; Jensen, Jonas; Hansen, Christian Fugl; Krogsgaard, Michael R.
In: Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2021, p. 1209-1215.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Choosing the most appropriate PROM for clinical studies in sports medicine
T2 - Article two in a series of ten
AU - Comins, Jonathan D.
AU - Brodersen, John
AU - Siersma, Volkert
AU - Jensen, Jonas
AU - Hansen, Christian Fugl
AU - Krogsgaard, Michael R.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Choosing the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for a clinical study is essential in order to achieve trustworthy results. This choice will depend on (a) the objective of the study and hence the research question; (b) the choice of a theoretical framework, such as the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF); (c) whether there currently is a PROM that possesses high content validity and high construct validity for the specific patient group and objective, and if not; (d) the decision on whether to use a suboptimal PROM or develop and validate a new PROM. This paper presents the steps that should be followed in order to assess the relevance of PROMs and suggests ways to enhance the choice depending on the goal of the study.
AB - Choosing the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for a clinical study is essential in order to achieve trustworthy results. This choice will depend on (a) the objective of the study and hence the research question; (b) the choice of a theoretical framework, such as the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF); (c) whether there currently is a PROM that possesses high content validity and high construct validity for the specific patient group and objective, and if not; (d) the decision on whether to use a suboptimal PROM or develop and validate a new PROM. This paper presents the steps that should be followed in order to assess the relevance of PROMs and suggests ways to enhance the choice depending on the goal of the study.
KW - condition-specific PROM
KW - generic PROM
KW - PICO
KW - sports medicine
KW - WHO-ICF
U2 - 10.1111/sms.13906
DO - 10.1111/sms.13906
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33342023
AN - SCOPUS:85098246155
VL - 31
SP - 1209
EP - 1215
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
SN - 0905-7188
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 255776736