Characterization of differences in immune responses during bolus and continuous infusion endotoxin challenges using mathematical modelling
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Characterization of differences in immune responses during bolus and continuous infusion endotoxin challenges using mathematical modelling. / Windoloski, Kristen A.; Janum, Susanne; Berg, Ronan M.G.; Olufsen, Mette S.
In: Experimental Physiology, Vol. 109, No. 5, 2024, p. 689-710.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of differences in immune responses during bolus and continuous infusion endotoxin challenges using mathematical modelling
AU - Windoloski, Kristen A.
AU - Janum, Susanne
AU - Berg, Ronan M.G.
AU - Olufsen, Mette S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors. Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Endotoxin administration is commonly used to study the inflammatory response, and though traditionally given as a bolus injection, it can be administered as a continuous infusion over multiple hours. Several studies hypothesize that the latter better represents the prolonged and pronounced inflammation observed in conditions like sepsis. Yet very few experimental studies have administered endotoxin using both strategies, leaving significant gaps in determining the underlying mechanisms responsible for their differing immune responses. We used mathematical modelling to analyse cytokine data from two studies administering a 2 ng kg−1 dose of endotoxin, one as a bolus and the other as a continuous infusion over 4 h. Using our model, we simulated the dynamics of mean and subject-specific cytokine responses as well as the response to long-term endotoxin administration. Cytokine measurements revealed that the bolus injection led to significantly higher peaks for interleukin (IL)-8, while IL-10 reaches higher peaks during continuous administration. Moreover, the peak timing of all measured cytokines occurred later with continuous infusion. We identified three model parameters that significantly differed between the two administration methods. Monocyte activation of IL-10 was greater during the continuous infusion, while tumour necrosis factor (Formula presented.) and IL-8 recovery rates were faster for the bolus injection. This suggests that a continuous infusion elicits a stronger, longer-lasting systemic reaction through increased stimulation of monocyte anti-inflammatory mediator production and decreased recovery of pro-inflammatory catalysts. Furthermore, the continuous infusion model exhibited prolonged inflammation with recurrent peaks resolving within 2 days during long-term (20–32 h) endotoxin administration.
AB - Endotoxin administration is commonly used to study the inflammatory response, and though traditionally given as a bolus injection, it can be administered as a continuous infusion over multiple hours. Several studies hypothesize that the latter better represents the prolonged and pronounced inflammation observed in conditions like sepsis. Yet very few experimental studies have administered endotoxin using both strategies, leaving significant gaps in determining the underlying mechanisms responsible for their differing immune responses. We used mathematical modelling to analyse cytokine data from two studies administering a 2 ng kg−1 dose of endotoxin, one as a bolus and the other as a continuous infusion over 4 h. Using our model, we simulated the dynamics of mean and subject-specific cytokine responses as well as the response to long-term endotoxin administration. Cytokine measurements revealed that the bolus injection led to significantly higher peaks for interleukin (IL)-8, while IL-10 reaches higher peaks during continuous administration. Moreover, the peak timing of all measured cytokines occurred later with continuous infusion. We identified three model parameters that significantly differed between the two administration methods. Monocyte activation of IL-10 was greater during the continuous infusion, while tumour necrosis factor (Formula presented.) and IL-8 recovery rates were faster for the bolus injection. This suggests that a continuous infusion elicits a stronger, longer-lasting systemic reaction through increased stimulation of monocyte anti-inflammatory mediator production and decreased recovery of pro-inflammatory catalysts. Furthermore, the continuous infusion model exhibited prolonged inflammation with recurrent peaks resolving within 2 days during long-term (20–32 h) endotoxin administration.
KW - administration method
KW - continuous infusion
KW - cytokines
KW - data analysis
KW - endotoxin challenge
KW - inflammation
KW - mathematical modelling
U2 - 10.1113/EP091552
DO - 10.1113/EP091552
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38466166
AN - SCOPUS:85187460803
VL - 109
SP - 689
EP - 710
JO - Experimental Physiology
JF - Experimental Physiology
SN - 0958-0670
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 386270614