Autoría en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional: : ¿cómo llega la Corte a la mayoría de edad?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Autoría en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional : : ¿cómo llega la Corte a la mayoría de edad? / Jiménez Laurence, Andrea; Fernandez Carter, Catalina.

In: Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal, No. 8, 01.01.2020, p. 1-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jiménez Laurence, A & Fernandez Carter, C 2020, 'Autoría en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional: : ¿cómo llega la Corte a la mayoría de edad?', Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal, no. 8, pp. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.9895

APA

Jiménez Laurence, A., & Fernandez Carter, C. (2020). Autoría en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional: : ¿cómo llega la Corte a la mayoría de edad? Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal, (8), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.9895

Vancouver

Jiménez Laurence A, Fernandez Carter C. Autoría en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional: : ¿cómo llega la Corte a la mayoría de edad? Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal. 2020 Jan 1;(8):1-29. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.9895

Author

Jiménez Laurence, Andrea ; Fernandez Carter, Catalina. / Autoría en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional : : ¿cómo llega la Corte a la mayoría de edad?. In: Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal. 2020 ; No. 8. pp. 1-29.

Bibtex

@article{8b03712840464e778a4078e82e98ad3b,
title = "Autor{\'i}a en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional: : ¿c{\'o}mo llega la Corte a la mayor{\'i}a de edad?",
abstract = "This article examines and systematizes the case law of the International Criminal Court regarding perpetration, as provided for in article 25.3(a) of the Rome Statute. The purpose is to determine if the criteria and requirements of this form of responsibility in its four variants (direct perpetration, co-perpetration, indirect perpetration, and indirect co-perpetration) are well established in the case law of the International Criminal Court or whether, on the contrary, there are still aspects that are imprecise or where differences of opinion within the Court persist that need to be clarified in years to come.",
author = "{Jim{\'e}nez Laurence}, Andrea and {Fernandez Carter}, Catalina",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.9895",
language = "Spansk",
pages = "1--29",
journal = "Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal",
issn = "2346-3120",
publisher = "Universidad del Rosario",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autoría en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Penal Internacional

T2 - : ¿cómo llega la Corte a la mayoría de edad?

AU - Jiménez Laurence, Andrea

AU - Fernandez Carter, Catalina

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - This article examines and systematizes the case law of the International Criminal Court regarding perpetration, as provided for in article 25.3(a) of the Rome Statute. The purpose is to determine if the criteria and requirements of this form of responsibility in its four variants (direct perpetration, co-perpetration, indirect perpetration, and indirect co-perpetration) are well established in the case law of the International Criminal Court or whether, on the contrary, there are still aspects that are imprecise or where differences of opinion within the Court persist that need to be clarified in years to come.

AB - This article examines and systematizes the case law of the International Criminal Court regarding perpetration, as provided for in article 25.3(a) of the Rome Statute. The purpose is to determine if the criteria and requirements of this form of responsibility in its four variants (direct perpetration, co-perpetration, indirect perpetration, and indirect co-perpetration) are well established in the case law of the International Criminal Court or whether, on the contrary, there are still aspects that are imprecise or where differences of opinion within the Court persist that need to be clarified in years to come.

U2 - 10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.9895

DO - 10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.9895

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

SP - 1

EP - 29

JO - Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal

JF - Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal

SN - 2346-3120

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 378676039