Article three in a series of ten How to develop a condition-specific PROM
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Article three in a series of ten How to develop a condition-specific PROM. / Comins, Jonathan D.; Brodersen, John; Siersma, Volkert; Jensen, Jonas; Hansen, Christian Fugl; Krogsgaard, Michael R.
In: Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2021, p. 1216-1224.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Article three in a series of ten How to develop a condition-specific PROM
AU - Comins, Jonathan D.
AU - Brodersen, John
AU - Siersma, Volkert
AU - Jensen, Jonas
AU - Hansen, Christian Fugl
AU - Krogsgaard, Michael R.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Developing new patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for application in clinical studies can be necessary if an adequate PROM does not exist. For adequate measurement, it is essential that the PROM has face validity (ie, is perceived to be relevant by clinicians and researchers) and has high content validity (ie, content relevance and content coverage for the targeted patient group). The steps needed to create PROMs that possess face and content validity for a specific condition are described in this paper. Face validity is achieved by item identification and generation through literature review. Content validity is confirmed through repetitive cognitive interviews of patients from the targeted patient group in order to generate a consensus-based pilot-version of the new PROM. This qualitative process ensures that items are appropriately worded, understandable, and minimizes doubts about how items should be answered. A practical example of this process is presented, which shows the development of the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL), a condition-specific PROM for patients with deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).
AB - Developing new patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for application in clinical studies can be necessary if an adequate PROM does not exist. For adequate measurement, it is essential that the PROM has face validity (ie, is perceived to be relevant by clinicians and researchers) and has high content validity (ie, content relevance and content coverage for the targeted patient group). The steps needed to create PROMs that possess face and content validity for a specific condition are described in this paper. Face validity is achieved by item identification and generation through literature review. Content validity is confirmed through repetitive cognitive interviews of patients from the targeted patient group in order to generate a consensus-based pilot-version of the new PROM. This qualitative process ensures that items are appropriately worded, understandable, and minimizes doubts about how items should be answered. A practical example of this process is presented, which shows the development of the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL), a condition-specific PROM for patients with deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).
KW - condition‐
KW - specific
KW - construct validity
KW - content validity
KW - face validity
KW - PROM development
KW - OF-LIFE INSTRUMENTS
KW - OUTCOME SCORE KOOS
KW - KNEE INJURY
KW - QUALITY
KW - CONSEQUENCES
KW - VALIDATION
KW - VALIDITY
KW - CHECKLIST
KW - HEALTH
KW - IMPACT
U2 - 10.1111/sms.13868
DO - 10.1111/sms.13868
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33145839
VL - 31
SP - 1216
EP - 1224
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
SN - 0905-7188
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 252591591