Applicability of a supramaximal high-intensity interval training program for older adults previously not engaged in regular exercise: analyses of secondary outcomes from the Umeå HIT Study

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Applicability of a supramaximal high-intensity interval training program for older adults previously not engaged in regular exercise : analyses of secondary outcomes from the Umeå HIT Study. / Frykholm, Erik; Simonsson, Emma; Levik Sandström, Sofi; Hedlund, Mattias; Holmberg, Henrik; Johansson, Bengt; Lindelöf, Nina; Boraxbekk, Carl Johan; Rosendahl, Erik.

In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Vol. 73, 102647, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Frykholm, E, Simonsson, E, Levik Sandström, S, Hedlund, M, Holmberg, H, Johansson, B, Lindelöf, N, Boraxbekk, CJ & Rosendahl, E 2024, 'Applicability of a supramaximal high-intensity interval training program for older adults previously not engaged in regular exercise: analyses of secondary outcomes from the Umeå HIT Study', Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 73, 102647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102647

APA

Frykholm, E., Simonsson, E., Levik Sandström, S., Hedlund, M., Holmberg, H., Johansson, B., Lindelöf, N., Boraxbekk, C. J., & Rosendahl, E. (2024). Applicability of a supramaximal high-intensity interval training program for older adults previously not engaged in regular exercise: analyses of secondary outcomes from the Umeå HIT Study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 73, [102647]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102647

Vancouver

Frykholm E, Simonsson E, Levik Sandström S, Hedlund M, Holmberg H, Johansson B et al. Applicability of a supramaximal high-intensity interval training program for older adults previously not engaged in regular exercise: analyses of secondary outcomes from the Umeå HIT Study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2024;73. 102647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102647

Author

Frykholm, Erik ; Simonsson, Emma ; Levik Sandström, Sofi ; Hedlund, Mattias ; Holmberg, Henrik ; Johansson, Bengt ; Lindelöf, Nina ; Boraxbekk, Carl Johan ; Rosendahl, Erik. / Applicability of a supramaximal high-intensity interval training program for older adults previously not engaged in regular exercise : analyses of secondary outcomes from the Umeå HIT Study. In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2024 ; Vol. 73.

Bibtex

@article{44fa1fb16c944dac85e8b0d24bc02cc7,
title = "Applicability of a supramaximal high-intensity interval training program for older adults previously not engaged in regular exercise: analyses of secondary outcomes from the Ume{\aa} HIT Study",
abstract = "This analysis of secondary outcomes investigated the applicability of supramaximal high-intensity interval training (HIT) with individually prescribed external intensity performed on stationary bicycles. Sixty-eight participants with a median (min; max) age of 69 (66; 79), at the time not engaged in regular exercise were randomized to 25 twice-weekly sessions of supramaximal HIT (20-min session with 10 × 6-s intervals) or moderate-intensity training (MIT, 40-min session with 3 × 8-min intervals). The primary aim was outcomes on applicability regarding; adherence to prescribed external interval intensity, participant reported positive and negative events, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE 6–20), and affective state (Feeling Scale, FS -5–5). A secondary aim was to investigate change in exercise-related self-efficacy (Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale) and motivation (Behavioural Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire-2). Total adherence to the prescribed external interval intensity was [median (min; max)] 89 % (56; 100 %) in supramaximal HIT, and 100 % (95; 100 %) in MIT. The supramaximal HIT group reported 60 % of the positive (112 of 186) and 36 % of the negative (52 of 146) events. At the end of the training period, the median (min; max) session RPE was 15 (12; 17) for supramaximal HIT and 14 (9; 15) for MIT. As for FS, the median last within-session rating was 3 (−1; 5) for supramaximal HIT and 3 (1; 5) for MIT. Exercise-related motivation increased (mean difference in Relative Autonomy Index score = 1.54, 95 % CI [0.69; 2.40]), while self-efficacy did not change (mean difference = 0.55, 95 % CI [-0.75; 1.82]), regardless of group. This study provide support for supramaximal HIT in supervised group settings for older adults.",
keywords = "Feasibility, HIIT, Randomized controlled trial, SIT, Sprint interval training",
author = "Erik Frykholm and Emma Simonsson and {Levik Sandstr{\"o}m}, Sofi and Mattias Hedlund and Henrik Holmberg and Bengt Johansson and Nina Lindel{\"o}f and Boraxbekk, {Carl Johan} and Erik Rosendahl",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102647",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
journal = "Psychology of Sport and Exercise",
issn = "1469-0292",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applicability of a supramaximal high-intensity interval training program for older adults previously not engaged in regular exercise

T2 - analyses of secondary outcomes from the Umeå HIT Study

AU - Frykholm, Erik

AU - Simonsson, Emma

AU - Levik Sandström, Sofi

AU - Hedlund, Mattias

AU - Holmberg, Henrik

AU - Johansson, Bengt

AU - Lindelöf, Nina

AU - Boraxbekk, Carl Johan

AU - Rosendahl, Erik

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - This analysis of secondary outcomes investigated the applicability of supramaximal high-intensity interval training (HIT) with individually prescribed external intensity performed on stationary bicycles. Sixty-eight participants with a median (min; max) age of 69 (66; 79), at the time not engaged in regular exercise were randomized to 25 twice-weekly sessions of supramaximal HIT (20-min session with 10 × 6-s intervals) or moderate-intensity training (MIT, 40-min session with 3 × 8-min intervals). The primary aim was outcomes on applicability regarding; adherence to prescribed external interval intensity, participant reported positive and negative events, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE 6–20), and affective state (Feeling Scale, FS -5–5). A secondary aim was to investigate change in exercise-related self-efficacy (Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale) and motivation (Behavioural Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire-2). Total adherence to the prescribed external interval intensity was [median (min; max)] 89 % (56; 100 %) in supramaximal HIT, and 100 % (95; 100 %) in MIT. The supramaximal HIT group reported 60 % of the positive (112 of 186) and 36 % of the negative (52 of 146) events. At the end of the training period, the median (min; max) session RPE was 15 (12; 17) for supramaximal HIT and 14 (9; 15) for MIT. As for FS, the median last within-session rating was 3 (−1; 5) for supramaximal HIT and 3 (1; 5) for MIT. Exercise-related motivation increased (mean difference in Relative Autonomy Index score = 1.54, 95 % CI [0.69; 2.40]), while self-efficacy did not change (mean difference = 0.55, 95 % CI [-0.75; 1.82]), regardless of group. This study provide support for supramaximal HIT in supervised group settings for older adults.

AB - This analysis of secondary outcomes investigated the applicability of supramaximal high-intensity interval training (HIT) with individually prescribed external intensity performed on stationary bicycles. Sixty-eight participants with a median (min; max) age of 69 (66; 79), at the time not engaged in regular exercise were randomized to 25 twice-weekly sessions of supramaximal HIT (20-min session with 10 × 6-s intervals) or moderate-intensity training (MIT, 40-min session with 3 × 8-min intervals). The primary aim was outcomes on applicability regarding; adherence to prescribed external interval intensity, participant reported positive and negative events, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE 6–20), and affective state (Feeling Scale, FS -5–5). A secondary aim was to investigate change in exercise-related self-efficacy (Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale) and motivation (Behavioural Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire-2). Total adherence to the prescribed external interval intensity was [median (min; max)] 89 % (56; 100 %) in supramaximal HIT, and 100 % (95; 100 %) in MIT. The supramaximal HIT group reported 60 % of the positive (112 of 186) and 36 % of the negative (52 of 146) events. At the end of the training period, the median (min; max) session RPE was 15 (12; 17) for supramaximal HIT and 14 (9; 15) for MIT. As for FS, the median last within-session rating was 3 (−1; 5) for supramaximal HIT and 3 (1; 5) for MIT. Exercise-related motivation increased (mean difference in Relative Autonomy Index score = 1.54, 95 % CI [0.69; 2.40]), while self-efficacy did not change (mean difference = 0.55, 95 % CI [-0.75; 1.82]), regardless of group. This study provide support for supramaximal HIT in supervised group settings for older adults.

KW - Feasibility

KW - HIIT

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - SIT

KW - Sprint interval training

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102647

DO - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102647

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38604572

AN - SCOPUS:85190305065

VL - 73

JO - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

JF - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

SN - 1469-0292

M1 - 102647

ER -

ID: 389507566