A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography. / Kristensen, Charlotte Burup; Myhr, Katrine Aagaard; Grund, Frederik Fasth; Vejlstrup, Niels; Hassager, Christian; Mattu, Raj; Mogelvang, Rasmus.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 12, 9980, 2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Kristensen, CB, Myhr, KA, Grund, FF, Vejlstrup, N, Hassager, C, Mattu, R & Mogelvang, R 2022, 'A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography', Scientific Reports, vol. 12, 9980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13677-1

APA

Kristensen, C. B., Myhr, K. A., Grund, F. F., Vejlstrup, N., Hassager, C., Mattu, R., & Mogelvang, R. (2022). A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography. Scientific Reports, 12, [9980]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13677-1

Vancouver

Kristensen CB, Myhr KA, Grund FF, Vejlstrup N, Hassager C, Mattu R et al. A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography. Scientific Reports. 2022;12. 9980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13677-1

Author

Kristensen, Charlotte Burup ; Myhr, Katrine Aagaard ; Grund, Frederik Fasth ; Vejlstrup, Niels ; Hassager, Christian ; Mattu, Raj ; Mogelvang, Rasmus. / A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography. In: Scientific Reports. 2022 ; Vol. 12.

Bibtex

@article{5cc431605eb14dacb34e87f61f7e7ad2,
title = "A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography",
abstract = "Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is a strong independent predictor for adverse cardiovascular events, but conventional echocardiographic methods are limited by poor reproducibility and accuracy. We developed a novel method based on adding the mean wall thickness from the parasternal short axis view, to the left ventricular end-diastolic volume acquired using the biplane model of discs. The participants (n = 85) had various left ventricular geometries and were assessed using echocardiography followed immediately by cardiac magnetic resonance, as reference. We compared our novel two-dimensional (2D) method to various conventional one-dimensional (1D) and other 2D methods as well as the three-dimensional (3D) method. Our novel method had better reproducibility in intra-examiner [coefficients of variation (CV) 9% vs. 11–14%] and inter-examiner analysis (CV 9% vs. 10–20%). Accuracy was similar to the 3D method (mean difference ± 95% limits of agreement, CV): Novel: 2 ± 50 g, 15% vs. 3D: 2 ± 51 g, 16%; and better than the “linear” 1D method by Devereux (7 ± 76 g, 23%). Our novel method is simple, has considerable better reproducibility and accuracy than conventional “linear” 1D methods, and similar accuracy as the 3D-method. As the biplane model forms part of the standard echocardiographic protocol, it does not require specific training and provides a supplement to the modern echocardiographic report.",
author = "Kristensen, {Charlotte Burup} and Myhr, {Katrine Aagaard} and Grund, {Frederik Fasth} and Niels Vejlstrup and Christian Hassager and Raj Mattu and Rasmus Mogelvang",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-022-13677-1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "nature publishing group",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography

AU - Kristensen, Charlotte Burup

AU - Myhr, Katrine Aagaard

AU - Grund, Frederik Fasth

AU - Vejlstrup, Niels

AU - Hassager, Christian

AU - Mattu, Raj

AU - Mogelvang, Rasmus

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is a strong independent predictor for adverse cardiovascular events, but conventional echocardiographic methods are limited by poor reproducibility and accuracy. We developed a novel method based on adding the mean wall thickness from the parasternal short axis view, to the left ventricular end-diastolic volume acquired using the biplane model of discs. The participants (n = 85) had various left ventricular geometries and were assessed using echocardiography followed immediately by cardiac magnetic resonance, as reference. We compared our novel two-dimensional (2D) method to various conventional one-dimensional (1D) and other 2D methods as well as the three-dimensional (3D) method. Our novel method had better reproducibility in intra-examiner [coefficients of variation (CV) 9% vs. 11–14%] and inter-examiner analysis (CV 9% vs. 10–20%). Accuracy was similar to the 3D method (mean difference ± 95% limits of agreement, CV): Novel: 2 ± 50 g, 15% vs. 3D: 2 ± 51 g, 16%; and better than the “linear” 1D method by Devereux (7 ± 76 g, 23%). Our novel method is simple, has considerable better reproducibility and accuracy than conventional “linear” 1D methods, and similar accuracy as the 3D-method. As the biplane model forms part of the standard echocardiographic protocol, it does not require specific training and provides a supplement to the modern echocardiographic report.

AB - Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is a strong independent predictor for adverse cardiovascular events, but conventional echocardiographic methods are limited by poor reproducibility and accuracy. We developed a novel method based on adding the mean wall thickness from the parasternal short axis view, to the left ventricular end-diastolic volume acquired using the biplane model of discs. The participants (n = 85) had various left ventricular geometries and were assessed using echocardiography followed immediately by cardiac magnetic resonance, as reference. We compared our novel two-dimensional (2D) method to various conventional one-dimensional (1D) and other 2D methods as well as the three-dimensional (3D) method. Our novel method had better reproducibility in intra-examiner [coefficients of variation (CV) 9% vs. 11–14%] and inter-examiner analysis (CV 9% vs. 10–20%). Accuracy was similar to the 3D method (mean difference ± 95% limits of agreement, CV): Novel: 2 ± 50 g, 15% vs. 3D: 2 ± 51 g, 16%; and better than the “linear” 1D method by Devereux (7 ± 76 g, 23%). Our novel method is simple, has considerable better reproducibility and accuracy than conventional “linear” 1D methods, and similar accuracy as the 3D-method. As the biplane model forms part of the standard echocardiographic protocol, it does not require specific training and provides a supplement to the modern echocardiographic report.

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-022-13677-1

DO - 10.1038/s41598-022-13677-1

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35705586

AN - SCOPUS:85132163253

VL - 12

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

M1 - 9980

ER -

ID: 319406353