Standard
A matter of importance : considering benefit in animal ethics review. / Olsson, I. Anna S.; Varga, Orsolya; Sandøe, Peter.
Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013. red. / Herwig Grimm; Norbert Alzmann; Vera Marashi. 2015. s. 33-36 (ALTEX Proceedings; Nr. 1, Bind 4).
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning
Harvard
Olsson, IAS, Varga, O
& Sandøe, P 2015,
A matter of importance: considering benefit in animal ethics review. i H Grimm, N Alzmann & V Marashi (red),
Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013. ALTEX Proceedings, nr. 1, bind 4, s. 33-36, Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU, Vienna, Østrig,
26/03/2013. <
http://www.altex.ch/ALTEX-Proceedings/Proceedings.98.html?iid=6>
APA
Olsson, I. A. S., Varga, O.
, & Sandøe, P. (2015).
A matter of importance: considering benefit in animal ethics review. I H. Grimm, N. Alzmann, & V. Marashi (red.),
Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013 (s. 33-36). ALTEX Proceedings Bind 4 Nr. 1
http://www.altex.ch/ALTEX-Proceedings/Proceedings.98.html?iid=6Vancouver
Olsson IAS, Varga O, Sandøe P. A matter of importance: considering benefit in animal ethics review. I Grimm H, Alzmann N, Marashi V, red., Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013. 2015. s. 33-36. (ALTEX Proceedings; Nr. 1, Bind 4).
Author
Olsson, I. Anna S. ; Varga, Orsolya ; Sandøe, Peter. / A matter of importance : considering benefit in animal ethics review. Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU: proceedings of a symposium at the Messerli Research Institute, Vienna, March 2013. red. / Herwig Grimm ; Norbert Alzmann ; Vera Marashi. 2015. s. 33-36 (ALTEX Proceedings; Nr. 1, Bind 4).
Bibtex
@inproceedings{910a5219931f40f781258088a5e1f274,
title = "A matter of importance: considering benefit in animal ethics review",
abstract = "Animal-based research presents an ethical dilemma between harms (to animals) and benefits (mainly to humans). According to Directive 2010/63/EU, project evaluation should include “a harm-benefit analysis of the project, to assess whether the harm to the animals in terms of suffering, pain and distress is justified by the expected outcome”. By defining benefit and its assessment very generally, legislation opens for a variety of interpretations. In this paper, we review different approaches, consider potential disagreements and highlight the need for a wider discussion of the role of the harm-benefit analysis in ethics review.",
author = "Olsson, {I. Anna S.} and Orsolya Varga and Peter Sand{\o}e",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
series = "ALTEX Proceedings",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",
pages = "33--36",
editor = "{ Grimm}, Herwig and Alzmann, {Norbert } and { Marashi}, Vera",
booktitle = "Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU",
note = "Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU ; Conference date: 26-03-2013 Through 27-03-2013",
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - A matter of importance
T2 - Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU
AU - Olsson, I. Anna S.
AU - Varga, Orsolya
AU - Sandøe, Peter
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Animal-based research presents an ethical dilemma between harms (to animals) and benefits (mainly to humans). According to Directive 2010/63/EU, project evaluation should include “a harm-benefit analysis of the project, to assess whether the harm to the animals in terms of suffering, pain and distress is justified by the expected outcome”. By defining benefit and its assessment very generally, legislation opens for a variety of interpretations. In this paper, we review different approaches, consider potential disagreements and highlight the need for a wider discussion of the role of the harm-benefit analysis in ethics review.
AB - Animal-based research presents an ethical dilemma between harms (to animals) and benefits (mainly to humans). According to Directive 2010/63/EU, project evaluation should include “a harm-benefit analysis of the project, to assess whether the harm to the animals in terms of suffering, pain and distress is justified by the expected outcome”. By defining benefit and its assessment very generally, legislation opens for a variety of interpretations. In this paper, we review different approaches, consider potential disagreements and highlight the need for a wider discussion of the role of the harm-benefit analysis in ethics review.
M3 - Article in proceedings
T3 - ALTEX Proceedings
SP - 33
EP - 36
BT - Taking ethical considerations into account? Methods to carry out the harm-benefit analysis according to the EU Directive 2010/6/EU
A2 - Grimm, Herwig
A2 - Alzmann, Norbert
A2 - Marashi, Vera
Y2 - 26 March 2013 through 27 March 2013
ER -
