Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science: In iConference 2014 Proceedings
Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Konferenceabstrakt til konference › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science : In iConference 2014 Proceedings. / Greifeneder, Elke Susanne; Connaway, Lynn Silipigni; Jiang, Tingting; Seadle, Michael; Weber-Wulff, Debora; Wolfram, Dietmar.
2014.Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Konferenceabstrakt til konference › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - ABST
T1 - Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science
T2 - In iConference 2014 Proceedings
AU - Greifeneder, Elke Susanne
AU - Connaway, Lynn Silipigni
AU - Jiang, Tingting
AU - Seadle, Michael
AU - Weber-Wulff, Debora
AU - Wolfram, Dietmar
N1 - iConference 2014 Proceedings
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - This paper describes a session for interaction and engagement to be held at iConference2014. The session for interaction and engagement focuses on researchers at iSchools and as such is an intellectual follow-up to the systematic check of all iConference2014 paper submissions in a copying detection system. The session offers a platform for discussing whether the use of such a system is justified for a conference that attracts submissions from highly respected researchers. Panel members and the audience will discuss the amount of text a researcher is allowed to reuse and when a submission would no longer be considered to be original and starts to be considered self-plagiarism. Parts of the discussion will center on the question of whether information science researchers can actually avoid repeating the same words when today they have to publish results from research projects in as many publications as possible.
AB - This paper describes a session for interaction and engagement to be held at iConference2014. The session for interaction and engagement focuses on researchers at iSchools and as such is an intellectual follow-up to the systematic check of all iConference2014 paper submissions in a copying detection system. The session offers a platform for discussing whether the use of such a system is justified for a conference that attracts submissions from highly respected researchers. Panel members and the audience will discuss the amount of text a researcher is allowed to reuse and when a submission would no longer be considered to be original and starts to be considered self-plagiarism. Parts of the discussion will center on the question of whether information science researchers can actually avoid repeating the same words when today they have to publish results from research projects in as many publications as possible.
KW - Faculty of Humanities
KW - Plagiarism
KW - publishing practices
KW - plagiarism software
U2 - 10.9776/14418
DO - 10.9776/14418
M3 - Conference abstract for conference
ER -
ID: 103054361