When the machine is wrong. Characteristics of true and false predictions of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrests in emergency calls using a machine-learning model

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

When the machine is wrong. Characteristics of true and false predictions of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrests in emergency calls using a machine-learning model. / Nikolaj Blomberg, Stig; Jensen, Theo W.; Porsborg Andersen, Mikkel; Folke, Fredrik; Kjær Ersbøll, Annette; Torp-Petersen, Christian; Lippert, Freddy; Collatz Christensen, Helle.

I: Resuscitation, Bind 183, 109689, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nikolaj Blomberg, S, Jensen, TW, Porsborg Andersen, M, Folke, F, Kjær Ersbøll, A, Torp-Petersen, C, Lippert, F & Collatz Christensen, H 2023, 'When the machine is wrong. Characteristics of true and false predictions of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrests in emergency calls using a machine-learning model', Resuscitation, bind 183, 109689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109689

APA

Nikolaj Blomberg, S., Jensen, T. W., Porsborg Andersen, M., Folke, F., Kjær Ersbøll, A., Torp-Petersen, C., Lippert, F., & Collatz Christensen, H. (2023). When the machine is wrong. Characteristics of true and false predictions of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrests in emergency calls using a machine-learning model. Resuscitation, 183, [109689]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109689

Vancouver

Nikolaj Blomberg S, Jensen TW, Porsborg Andersen M, Folke F, Kjær Ersbøll A, Torp-Petersen C o.a. When the machine is wrong. Characteristics of true and false predictions of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrests in emergency calls using a machine-learning model. Resuscitation. 2023;183. 109689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109689

Author

Nikolaj Blomberg, Stig ; Jensen, Theo W. ; Porsborg Andersen, Mikkel ; Folke, Fredrik ; Kjær Ersbøll, Annette ; Torp-Petersen, Christian ; Lippert, Freddy ; Collatz Christensen, Helle. / When the machine is wrong. Characteristics of true and false predictions of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrests in emergency calls using a machine-learning model. I: Resuscitation. 2023 ; Bind 183.

Bibtex

@article{3e144dca1962440c8d61e67670d9571d,
title = "When the machine is wrong. Characteristics of true and false predictions of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrests in emergency calls using a machine-learning model",
abstract = "Background: A machine-learning model trained to recognize emergency calls regarding Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) was tested in clinical practice at Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (EMS) from September 2018 to December 2019. We aimed to investigate emergency call characteristics where the machine-learning model failed to recognize OHCA or misinterpreted a call as being OHCA. Methods: All emergency calls were linked to the dispatch database and verified OHCAs were identified by linkage to the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry. Calls with either false negative or false positive predictions of OHCA were evaluated by trained auditors. Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute numbers and percentages reported. Results: The machine-learning model processed 169,236 calls to Copenhagen EMS and suspected 5,811 (3.4%) of the calls as OHCA, resulting in 84.5% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity. Among OHCAs not recognised by machine-learning model, a condition completely different from OHCA was presented by caller in 31% of the cases. In 28% of unrecognised calls, patient was reported breathing normally, and language barriers were identified in 23% of the cases. Among falsely suspected OHCA, the patient was reported unconscious in 28% of the cases, and in 13% of the false positive cases the machine-learning model interpreted calls regarding dead patients with irreversible signs of death as OHCA. Conclusion: Continuous optimization of the language model is needed to improve the prediction of OHCA and thereby improve sensitivity and specificity of the machine-learning model on recognising OHCA in emergency telephone calls.",
keywords = "AI, Dispatch, Emergency Medicine, Machine-learning, OHCA, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, cardiology",
author = "{Nikolaj Blomberg}, Stig and Jensen, {Theo W.} and {Porsborg Andersen}, Mikkel and Fredrik Folke and {Kj{\ae}r Ersb{\o}ll}, Annette and Christian Torp-Petersen and Freddy Lippert and {Collatz Christensen}, Helle",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s)",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109689",
language = "English",
volume = "183",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When the machine is wrong. Characteristics of true and false predictions of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrests in emergency calls using a machine-learning model

AU - Nikolaj Blomberg, Stig

AU - Jensen, Theo W.

AU - Porsborg Andersen, Mikkel

AU - Folke, Fredrik

AU - Kjær Ersbøll, Annette

AU - Torp-Petersen, Christian

AU - Lippert, Freddy

AU - Collatz Christensen, Helle

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: A machine-learning model trained to recognize emergency calls regarding Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) was tested in clinical practice at Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (EMS) from September 2018 to December 2019. We aimed to investigate emergency call characteristics where the machine-learning model failed to recognize OHCA or misinterpreted a call as being OHCA. Methods: All emergency calls were linked to the dispatch database and verified OHCAs were identified by linkage to the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry. Calls with either false negative or false positive predictions of OHCA were evaluated by trained auditors. Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute numbers and percentages reported. Results: The machine-learning model processed 169,236 calls to Copenhagen EMS and suspected 5,811 (3.4%) of the calls as OHCA, resulting in 84.5% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity. Among OHCAs not recognised by machine-learning model, a condition completely different from OHCA was presented by caller in 31% of the cases. In 28% of unrecognised calls, patient was reported breathing normally, and language barriers were identified in 23% of the cases. Among falsely suspected OHCA, the patient was reported unconscious in 28% of the cases, and in 13% of the false positive cases the machine-learning model interpreted calls regarding dead patients with irreversible signs of death as OHCA. Conclusion: Continuous optimization of the language model is needed to improve the prediction of OHCA and thereby improve sensitivity and specificity of the machine-learning model on recognising OHCA in emergency telephone calls.

AB - Background: A machine-learning model trained to recognize emergency calls regarding Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) was tested in clinical practice at Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (EMS) from September 2018 to December 2019. We aimed to investigate emergency call characteristics where the machine-learning model failed to recognize OHCA or misinterpreted a call as being OHCA. Methods: All emergency calls were linked to the dispatch database and verified OHCAs were identified by linkage to the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry. Calls with either false negative or false positive predictions of OHCA were evaluated by trained auditors. Descriptive analyses were performed with absolute numbers and percentages reported. Results: The machine-learning model processed 169,236 calls to Copenhagen EMS and suspected 5,811 (3.4%) of the calls as OHCA, resulting in 84.5% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity. Among OHCAs not recognised by machine-learning model, a condition completely different from OHCA was presented by caller in 31% of the cases. In 28% of unrecognised calls, patient was reported breathing normally, and language barriers were identified in 23% of the cases. Among falsely suspected OHCA, the patient was reported unconscious in 28% of the cases, and in 13% of the false positive cases the machine-learning model interpreted calls regarding dead patients with irreversible signs of death as OHCA. Conclusion: Continuous optimization of the language model is needed to improve the prediction of OHCA and thereby improve sensitivity and specificity of the machine-learning model on recognising OHCA in emergency telephone calls.

KW - AI

KW - Dispatch

KW - Emergency Medicine

KW - Machine-learning

KW - OHCA

KW - Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, cardiology

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109689

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109689

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36634755

AN - SCOPUS:85146449645

VL - 183

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

M1 - 109689

ER -

ID: 342827018