Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe. / Kokotovic, D; Sjølander, H; Gögenur, I; Helgstrand, F.

I: Hernia, Bind 20, Nr. 2, 04.2016, s. 281-7.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kokotovic, D, Sjølander, H, Gögenur, I & Helgstrand, F 2016, 'Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe', Hernia, bind 20, nr. 2, s. 281-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1464-z

APA

Kokotovic, D., Sjølander, H., Gögenur, I., & Helgstrand, F. (2016). Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe. Hernia, 20(2), 281-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1464-z

Vancouver

Kokotovic D, Sjølander H, Gögenur I, Helgstrand F. Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe. Hernia. 2016 apr.;20(2):281-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1464-z

Author

Kokotovic, D ; Sjølander, H ; Gögenur, I ; Helgstrand, F. / Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe. I: Hernia. 2016 ; Bind 20, Nr. 2. s. 281-7.

Bibtex

@article{ab3b2c9615874813bf5afed4df85da61,
title = "Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Due to risks of postoperative morbidity and recurrence some patients with a ventral hernia are not offered surgical repair. There is limited data on the rate and consequences of a watchful waiting (WW) strategy for these patients. The objective of this cohort study was to analyse outcomes for patients with a ventral hernia who underwent watchful waiting, in terms of later requirement for hernia repair.METHODS: All patients (≥18 years) electively referred to our out-patient clinic from 1 January 2009 to 1 July 2014 with incisional, umbilical or epigastric hernia were included. Information on patient characteristics and whether patients underwent WW or surgery was obtained from hospital files and the Danish National Patient Register. A 100% follow-up was obtained.RESULTS: The analyses comprised 569 patients with incisional hernia (WW = 58.1%) and 789 patients with umbilical/epigastric hernia (WW = 43.2%). Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated that the probability for patients who underwent watchful waiting to receive later surgical repair was 19 for incisional hernias and 16% for umbilical/epigastric hernias after 5 years. The probability of requiring emergency repair when in the WW group was 4% for both incisional and umbilical/epigastric hernias after 5 years. There were no significant differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation or mortality rates between the WW patients who later underwent elective hernia repair and patients who were initially offered surgery (p > 0.05), for both incisional and umbilical/epigastric hernias.CONCLUSIONS: Watchful waiting appears to be a safe strategy in the treatment of incisional, umbilical and epigastric hernias.",
keywords = "Aged, Cohort Studies, Female, Hernia, Ventral, Humans, Incisional Hernia, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Watchful Waiting, Wound Healing, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "D Kokotovic and H Sj{\o}lander and I G{\"o}genur and F Helgstrand",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s10029-016-1464-z",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "281--7",
journal = "Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery",
issn = "1265-4906",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag France",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe

AU - Kokotovic, D

AU - Sjølander, H

AU - Gögenur, I

AU - Helgstrand, F

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - PURPOSE: Due to risks of postoperative morbidity and recurrence some patients with a ventral hernia are not offered surgical repair. There is limited data on the rate and consequences of a watchful waiting (WW) strategy for these patients. The objective of this cohort study was to analyse outcomes for patients with a ventral hernia who underwent watchful waiting, in terms of later requirement for hernia repair.METHODS: All patients (≥18 years) electively referred to our out-patient clinic from 1 January 2009 to 1 July 2014 with incisional, umbilical or epigastric hernia were included. Information on patient characteristics and whether patients underwent WW or surgery was obtained from hospital files and the Danish National Patient Register. A 100% follow-up was obtained.RESULTS: The analyses comprised 569 patients with incisional hernia (WW = 58.1%) and 789 patients with umbilical/epigastric hernia (WW = 43.2%). Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated that the probability for patients who underwent watchful waiting to receive later surgical repair was 19 for incisional hernias and 16% for umbilical/epigastric hernias after 5 years. The probability of requiring emergency repair when in the WW group was 4% for both incisional and umbilical/epigastric hernias after 5 years. There were no significant differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation or mortality rates between the WW patients who later underwent elective hernia repair and patients who were initially offered surgery (p > 0.05), for both incisional and umbilical/epigastric hernias.CONCLUSIONS: Watchful waiting appears to be a safe strategy in the treatment of incisional, umbilical and epigastric hernias.

AB - PURPOSE: Due to risks of postoperative morbidity and recurrence some patients with a ventral hernia are not offered surgical repair. There is limited data on the rate and consequences of a watchful waiting (WW) strategy for these patients. The objective of this cohort study was to analyse outcomes for patients with a ventral hernia who underwent watchful waiting, in terms of later requirement for hernia repair.METHODS: All patients (≥18 years) electively referred to our out-patient clinic from 1 January 2009 to 1 July 2014 with incisional, umbilical or epigastric hernia were included. Information on patient characteristics and whether patients underwent WW or surgery was obtained from hospital files and the Danish National Patient Register. A 100% follow-up was obtained.RESULTS: The analyses comprised 569 patients with incisional hernia (WW = 58.1%) and 789 patients with umbilical/epigastric hernia (WW = 43.2%). Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated that the probability for patients who underwent watchful waiting to receive later surgical repair was 19 for incisional hernias and 16% for umbilical/epigastric hernias after 5 years. The probability of requiring emergency repair when in the WW group was 4% for both incisional and umbilical/epigastric hernias after 5 years. There were no significant differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation or mortality rates between the WW patients who later underwent elective hernia repair and patients who were initially offered surgery (p > 0.05), for both incisional and umbilical/epigastric hernias.CONCLUSIONS: Watchful waiting appears to be a safe strategy in the treatment of incisional, umbilical and epigastric hernias.

KW - Aged

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Female

KW - Hernia, Ventral

KW - Humans

KW - Incisional Hernia

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Watchful Waiting

KW - Wound Healing

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1007/s10029-016-1464-z

DO - 10.1007/s10029-016-1464-z

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26838293

VL - 20

SP - 281

EP - 287

JO - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

JF - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

SN - 1265-4906

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 178889944