Vulnerability Theory as a Paradigm Shift in International Investment Law: Reimagining the Role of the State

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Vulnerability Theory as a Paradigm Shift in International Investment Law : Reimagining the Role of the State. / Küçüksu, Aysel; Ünüvar, Güneş.

I: Business and Human Rights Journal, Bind 8, Nr. 3, 2023, s. 309-328.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Küçüksu, A & Ünüvar, G 2023, 'Vulnerability Theory as a Paradigm Shift in International Investment Law: Reimagining the Role of the State', Business and Human Rights Journal, bind 8, nr. 3, s. 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2023.38

APA

Küçüksu, A., & Ünüvar, G. (2023). Vulnerability Theory as a Paradigm Shift in International Investment Law: Reimagining the Role of the State. Business and Human Rights Journal, 8(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2023.38

Vancouver

Küçüksu A, Ünüvar G. Vulnerability Theory as a Paradigm Shift in International Investment Law: Reimagining the Role of the State. Business and Human Rights Journal. 2023;8(3):309-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2023.38

Author

Küçüksu, Aysel ; Ünüvar, Güneş. / Vulnerability Theory as a Paradigm Shift in International Investment Law : Reimagining the Role of the State. I: Business and Human Rights Journal. 2023 ; Bind 8, Nr. 3. s. 309-328.

Bibtex

@article{fa5b03eb2c4640deb4bbd02f2a9f2aea,
title = "Vulnerability Theory as a Paradigm Shift in International Investment Law: Reimagining the Role of the State",
abstract = "This article argues for a fundamental raison d{\textquoteright}{\^e}tre reconceptualization of international investment law (IIL) through Martha Fineman{\textquoteright}s {\textquoteleft}vulnerability theory{\textquoteright}. The theory helps identify the structural sources of IIL{\textquoteright}s shortcomings, whilst philosophically challenging the one-sided view that foreign investors are entitled to protections, but are free from obligations vis-{\`a}-vis the communities affected by their undertakings. Emphasizing the productive power of the state to take positive action that acknowledges ordinary citizens{\textquoteright} embeddedness within, and dependence upon, surrounding structures, the vulnerability theory challenges the hegemonic perception of the state as a source of danger – a view which has hitherto undermined both the potency and the enforceability of investor obligations. Used as a heuristic device in studying both IIL{\textquoteright}s existing structures and the potential avenues for reimagining it, Fineman{\textquoteright}s theory not only shines a novel light on the foundational premises of IIL, but also grants theoretical traction to existing ideas about improving the system.",
author = "Aysel K{\"u}{\c c}{\"u}ksu and G{\"u}ne{\c s} {\"U}n{\"u}var",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1017/bhj.2023.38",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "309--328",
journal = "Business and Human Rights Journal",
issn = "2057-0198",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vulnerability Theory as a Paradigm Shift in International Investment Law

T2 - Reimagining the Role of the State

AU - Küçüksu, Aysel

AU - Ünüvar, Güneş

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This article argues for a fundamental raison d’être reconceptualization of international investment law (IIL) through Martha Fineman’s ‘vulnerability theory’. The theory helps identify the structural sources of IIL’s shortcomings, whilst philosophically challenging the one-sided view that foreign investors are entitled to protections, but are free from obligations vis-à-vis the communities affected by their undertakings. Emphasizing the productive power of the state to take positive action that acknowledges ordinary citizens’ embeddedness within, and dependence upon, surrounding structures, the vulnerability theory challenges the hegemonic perception of the state as a source of danger – a view which has hitherto undermined both the potency and the enforceability of investor obligations. Used as a heuristic device in studying both IIL’s existing structures and the potential avenues for reimagining it, Fineman’s theory not only shines a novel light on the foundational premises of IIL, but also grants theoretical traction to existing ideas about improving the system.

AB - This article argues for a fundamental raison d’être reconceptualization of international investment law (IIL) through Martha Fineman’s ‘vulnerability theory’. The theory helps identify the structural sources of IIL’s shortcomings, whilst philosophically challenging the one-sided view that foreign investors are entitled to protections, but are free from obligations vis-à-vis the communities affected by their undertakings. Emphasizing the productive power of the state to take positive action that acknowledges ordinary citizens’ embeddedness within, and dependence upon, surrounding structures, the vulnerability theory challenges the hegemonic perception of the state as a source of danger – a view which has hitherto undermined both the potency and the enforceability of investor obligations. Used as a heuristic device in studying both IIL’s existing structures and the potential avenues for reimagining it, Fineman’s theory not only shines a novel light on the foundational premises of IIL, but also grants theoretical traction to existing ideas about improving the system.

U2 - 10.1017/bhj.2023.38

DO - 10.1017/bhj.2023.38

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 309

EP - 328

JO - Business and Human Rights Journal

JF - Business and Human Rights Journal

SN - 2057-0198

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 369365857