Usual care for low back pain and barriers to best practice: A cross-sectional study in Danish general practice

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Usual care for low back pain and barriers to best practice : A cross-sectional study in Danish general practice. / Arnbak, Bodil Al Mashhadi; Jensen, Tue Secher; Lund, Rikke Arnborg; Hartvigsen, Jan; Søndergaard, Jens; Thomsen, Janus Laust; Andersen, John Sahl; Møller, Anne; Nørgaard, Birgitte; Rossen, Camilla Blach; Kongsted, Alice.

I: Musculoskeletal Care, Bind 22, Nr. 2, e1911, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Arnbak, BAM, Jensen, TS, Lund, RA, Hartvigsen, J, Søndergaard, J, Thomsen, JL, Andersen, JS, Møller, A, Nørgaard, B, Rossen, CB & Kongsted, A 2024, 'Usual care for low back pain and barriers to best practice: A cross-sectional study in Danish general practice', Musculoskeletal Care, bind 22, nr. 2, e1911. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1911

APA

Arnbak, B. A. M., Jensen, T. S., Lund, R. A., Hartvigsen, J., Søndergaard, J., Thomsen, J. L., Andersen, J. S., Møller, A., Nørgaard, B., Rossen, C. B., & Kongsted, A. (2024). Usual care for low back pain and barriers to best practice: A cross-sectional study in Danish general practice. Musculoskeletal Care, 22(2), [e1911]. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1911

Vancouver

Arnbak BAM, Jensen TS, Lund RA, Hartvigsen J, Søndergaard J, Thomsen JL o.a. Usual care for low back pain and barriers to best practice: A cross-sectional study in Danish general practice. Musculoskeletal Care. 2024;22(2). e1911. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1911

Author

Arnbak, Bodil Al Mashhadi ; Jensen, Tue Secher ; Lund, Rikke Arnborg ; Hartvigsen, Jan ; Søndergaard, Jens ; Thomsen, Janus Laust ; Andersen, John Sahl ; Møller, Anne ; Nørgaard, Birgitte ; Rossen, Camilla Blach ; Kongsted, Alice. / Usual care for low back pain and barriers to best practice : A cross-sectional study in Danish general practice. I: Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 ; Bind 22, Nr. 2.

Bibtex

@article{7c586045affd4723b0bed8e6a970c1c8,
title = "Usual care for low back pain and barriers to best practice: A cross-sectional study in Danish general practice",
abstract = "Objectives: To describe the current content of low back pain (LBP) care in Danish general practice, the patients' self-management activities, and the clinicians' experienced barriers to providing best practice care. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included adults with LBP seeking care in Danish general practice from August 2022 to June 2023. Patient-reported information included demographics, pain intensity, medical history, treatments, and self-management strategies. Clinicians provided data specific to each consultation, detailing the content of these consultations, and barriers to best practice in the specific cases. Results: The study involved 71 clinicians from 42 general practice clinics, with patient-reported data from 294 patients, and clinician-reported data from 283 (95%) consultations. The mean age for the included patients was 53 years, 56% were female, and 31% had been on sick leave for LBP during the previous 3 months. Moreover, 44% had seen two or more healthcare professionals in the previous month, 55% had previously undergone diagnostic imaging for LBP, 81% reported using any type of analgesics, and 14% reported using opioids. The majority (91%) reported engaging in self-management activities to alleviate pain. Consultations typically included a physical examination (84%), information about the cause of the pain (74%), and management advice (68%), as reported by clinicians or patients. In general, clinicians reported consultation elements more frequently than patients. Clinicians reported providing best practice care in 84% of cases, with time constraints (23%) and patient expectations (10%) being the most common barriers. Conclusions: This study provides detailed insights into the management of LBP in Danish general practice. It reveals a complex landscape of patient engagement, varying management strategies, and differing perceptions of care content between patients and clinicians. Patients were often engaged in self-management activities and clinicians reported few barriers to providing best practice care.",
keywords = "general practice, healthcare, low back pain, self-management",
author = "Arnbak, {Bodil Al Mashhadi} and Jensen, {Tue Secher} and Lund, {Rikke Arnborg} and Jan Hartvigsen and Jens S{\o}ndergaard and Thomsen, {Janus Laust} and Andersen, {John Sahl} and Anne M{\o}ller and Birgitte N{\o}rgaard and Rossen, {Camilla Blach} and Alice Kongsted",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). Musculoskeletal Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1002/msc.1911",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Musculoskeletal Care",
issn = "1478-2189",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Usual care for low back pain and barriers to best practice

T2 - A cross-sectional study in Danish general practice

AU - Arnbak, Bodil Al Mashhadi

AU - Jensen, Tue Secher

AU - Lund, Rikke Arnborg

AU - Hartvigsen, Jan

AU - Søndergaard, Jens

AU - Thomsen, Janus Laust

AU - Andersen, John Sahl

AU - Møller, Anne

AU - Nørgaard, Birgitte

AU - Rossen, Camilla Blach

AU - Kongsted, Alice

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Musculoskeletal Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Objectives: To describe the current content of low back pain (LBP) care in Danish general practice, the patients' self-management activities, and the clinicians' experienced barriers to providing best practice care. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included adults with LBP seeking care in Danish general practice from August 2022 to June 2023. Patient-reported information included demographics, pain intensity, medical history, treatments, and self-management strategies. Clinicians provided data specific to each consultation, detailing the content of these consultations, and barriers to best practice in the specific cases. Results: The study involved 71 clinicians from 42 general practice clinics, with patient-reported data from 294 patients, and clinician-reported data from 283 (95%) consultations. The mean age for the included patients was 53 years, 56% were female, and 31% had been on sick leave for LBP during the previous 3 months. Moreover, 44% had seen two or more healthcare professionals in the previous month, 55% had previously undergone diagnostic imaging for LBP, 81% reported using any type of analgesics, and 14% reported using opioids. The majority (91%) reported engaging in self-management activities to alleviate pain. Consultations typically included a physical examination (84%), information about the cause of the pain (74%), and management advice (68%), as reported by clinicians or patients. In general, clinicians reported consultation elements more frequently than patients. Clinicians reported providing best practice care in 84% of cases, with time constraints (23%) and patient expectations (10%) being the most common barriers. Conclusions: This study provides detailed insights into the management of LBP in Danish general practice. It reveals a complex landscape of patient engagement, varying management strategies, and differing perceptions of care content between patients and clinicians. Patients were often engaged in self-management activities and clinicians reported few barriers to providing best practice care.

AB - Objectives: To describe the current content of low back pain (LBP) care in Danish general practice, the patients' self-management activities, and the clinicians' experienced barriers to providing best practice care. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included adults with LBP seeking care in Danish general practice from August 2022 to June 2023. Patient-reported information included demographics, pain intensity, medical history, treatments, and self-management strategies. Clinicians provided data specific to each consultation, detailing the content of these consultations, and barriers to best practice in the specific cases. Results: The study involved 71 clinicians from 42 general practice clinics, with patient-reported data from 294 patients, and clinician-reported data from 283 (95%) consultations. The mean age for the included patients was 53 years, 56% were female, and 31% had been on sick leave for LBP during the previous 3 months. Moreover, 44% had seen two or more healthcare professionals in the previous month, 55% had previously undergone diagnostic imaging for LBP, 81% reported using any type of analgesics, and 14% reported using opioids. The majority (91%) reported engaging in self-management activities to alleviate pain. Consultations typically included a physical examination (84%), information about the cause of the pain (74%), and management advice (68%), as reported by clinicians or patients. In general, clinicians reported consultation elements more frequently than patients. Clinicians reported providing best practice care in 84% of cases, with time constraints (23%) and patient expectations (10%) being the most common barriers. Conclusions: This study provides detailed insights into the management of LBP in Danish general practice. It reveals a complex landscape of patient engagement, varying management strategies, and differing perceptions of care content between patients and clinicians. Patients were often engaged in self-management activities and clinicians reported few barriers to providing best practice care.

KW - general practice

KW - healthcare

KW - low back pain

KW - self-management

U2 - 10.1002/msc.1911

DO - 10.1002/msc.1911

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38923268

AN - SCOPUS:85196773200

VL - 22

JO - Musculoskeletal Care

JF - Musculoskeletal Care

SN - 1478-2189

IS - 2

M1 - e1911

ER -

ID: 396925324