Transoral robotic surgery–time for consensus on pain assessment. A review
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Background
In Head and Neck surgery Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is evolving as a key treatment option for benign and malignant lesions in the oropharynx. Even so, postoperative pain is one of the primary early complaints following TORS. Well established evidence-based procedure specific pain treatment guidelines are available for a variety of other surgical specialties. However, there are no guidelines for TORS
Aim
This review describes the available data of early pain intensity following TORS during rest and procedure related activity.
Methods
Literature concerning pain in the immediate postoperative phase following TORS were obtained from two literature databases
Results
Most data on pain intensity following TORS are based upon a numeric rating scale, e.g. the Visual Analogue Scale and/or analgesic demands. Only one randomized clinical trial is available reflecting that the literature is mainly based on retrospective and a few prospective studies. Only one study analyzed pain during relevant functionality, i.e. swallowing. Overall, the studies suffer from a non-standardized approach and there is a need for transparent information concerning the timing of pain ratings and methodology
Conclusions
The evidence for optimal pain control is limited, particularly during surgical relevant activity. Postoperative pain rating during activity is a fundamental element in pain trials in order to enhance recovery thereby calling for future consensus on assessment methodology
In Head and Neck surgery Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is evolving as a key treatment option for benign and malignant lesions in the oropharynx. Even so, postoperative pain is one of the primary early complaints following TORS. Well established evidence-based procedure specific pain treatment guidelines are available for a variety of other surgical specialties. However, there are no guidelines for TORS
Aim
This review describes the available data of early pain intensity following TORS during rest and procedure related activity.
Methods
Literature concerning pain in the immediate postoperative phase following TORS were obtained from two literature databases
Results
Most data on pain intensity following TORS are based upon a numeric rating scale, e.g. the Visual Analogue Scale and/or analgesic demands. Only one randomized clinical trial is available reflecting that the literature is mainly based on retrospective and a few prospective studies. Only one study analyzed pain during relevant functionality, i.e. swallowing. Overall, the studies suffer from a non-standardized approach and there is a need for transparent information concerning the timing of pain ratings and methodology
Conclusions
The evidence for optimal pain control is limited, particularly during surgical relevant activity. Postoperative pain rating during activity is a fundamental element in pain trials in order to enhance recovery thereby calling for future consensus on assessment methodology
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Acta Oto-Laryngologica |
Vol/bind | 143 |
Udgave nummer | 10 |
Sider (fra-til) | 902-911 |
Antal sider | 10 |
ISSN | 0001-6489 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2023 |
Bibliografisk note
Funding Information:
This study was supported by a private non-profit foundation (Candys Foundation), Research grant 2019-304
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Acta Oto-Laryngologica AB (Ltd).
ID: 395914104