Transoral Robotic Surgery for Recurrent Tumors of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract (RECUT): An International Cohort Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • John C. Hardman
  • F. Chris Holsinger
  • Grainne C. Brady
  • Avinash Beharry
  • Alec T. Bonifer
  • Gregoire D'Andréa
  • Surender K. Dabas
  • John R. de Almeida
  • Umamaheswar Duvvuri
  • Peter Floros
  • Tamer A. Ghanem
  • Philippe Gorphe
  • Neil D. Gross
  • David Hamilton
  • Chareeni Kurukulasuriya
  • Daniel J. Lin
  • J. Scott Magnuson
  • Jeroen Meulemans
  • Brett A. Miles
  • Eric J. Moore
  • Gouri Pantvaidya
  • Scott Roof
  • Niclas Rubek
  • Christian Simon
  • Anand Subash
  • Michael C. Topf
  • Kathryn M. Van Abel
  • Vincent Vander Poorten
  • Evan S. Walgama
  • Emily Greenlay
  • Laura Potts
  • Arun Balaji
  • Heather M. Starmer
  • Sarah Stephen
  • Justin Roe
  • Kevin Harrington
  • Vinidh Paleri

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is an emerging minimally invasive surgical treatment for residual, recurrent, and new primary head and neck cancers in previously irradiated fields, with limited evidence for its oncological effectiveness. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive cases performed in 16 high-volume international centers before August 2018 was conducted (registered at clinicaltrials.gov [NCT04673929] as the RECUT study). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, disease-specific survivals (DSS), and local control (LC) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, with subgroups compared using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling for multivariable analysis. Maximally selected rank statistics determined the cut point for closest surgical resection margin based on LC. RESULTS: Data for 278 eligible patients were analyzed, with median follow-up of 38.5 months. Two-year and 5-year outcomes were 69.0% and 62.2% for LC, 71.8% and 49.8% for OS, 47.2% and 35.7% for disease-free survival, and 78.7% and 59.1% for disease-specific survivals. The most discriminating margin cut point was 1.0 mm; the 2-year LC was 80.9% above and 54.2% below or equal to 1.0 mm. Increasing age, current smoking, primary tumor classification, and narrow surgical margins (≤1.0 mm) were statistically significantly associated with lower OS. Hemorrhage with return to theater was seen in 8.1% (n = 22 of 272), and 30-day mortality was 1.8% (n = 5 of 272). At 1 year, 10.8% (n = 21 of 195) used tracheostomies, 33.8% (n = 66 of 195) used gastrostomies, and 66.3% (n = 53 of 80) had maintained or improved normalcy of diet scores. CONCLUSIONS: Data from international centers show TORS to treat head and neck cancers in previously irradiated fields yields favorable outcomes for LC and survival. Where feasible, TORS should be considered the preferred surgical treatment in the salvage setting.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Vol/bind114
Udgave nummer10
Sider (fra-til)1400-1409
ISSN0027-8874
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

ID: 324668534