The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic. / Halvorson, Hans.

I: Philosophy of Science, Bind 80, Nr. 3, 2013, s. 475-478.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Halvorson, H 2013, 'The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic', Philosophy of Science, bind 80, nr. 3, s. 475-478. https://doi.org/10.1086/671077

APA

Halvorson, H. (2013). The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic. Philosophy of Science, 80(3), 475-478. https://doi.org/10.1086/671077

Vancouver

Halvorson H. The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic. Philosophy of Science. 2013;80(3):475-478. https://doi.org/10.1086/671077

Author

Halvorson, Hans. / The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic. I: Philosophy of Science. 2013 ; Bind 80, Nr. 3. s. 475-478.

Bibtex

@article{cb7ce1b1c5374d64b9e08e6e9a418abd,
title = "The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic",
abstract = "Halvorson argues that the semantic view of theories leads to absurdities. Glymour shows how to inoculate the semantic view against Halvorson{\textquoteright}s criticisms, namely, by making it into a syntactic view of theories. I argue that this modified semantic-syntactic view cannot do the philosophical work that the original “language-free” semantic view was supposed to do.",
author = "Hans Halvorson",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1086/671077",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "475--478",
journal = "Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0031-8248",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic

AU - Halvorson, Hans

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Halvorson argues that the semantic view of theories leads to absurdities. Glymour shows how to inoculate the semantic view against Halvorson’s criticisms, namely, by making it into a syntactic view of theories. I argue that this modified semantic-syntactic view cannot do the philosophical work that the original “language-free” semantic view was supposed to do.

AB - Halvorson argues that the semantic view of theories leads to absurdities. Glymour shows how to inoculate the semantic view against Halvorson’s criticisms, namely, by making it into a syntactic view of theories. I argue that this modified semantic-syntactic view cannot do the philosophical work that the original “language-free” semantic view was supposed to do.

U2 - 10.1086/671077

DO - 10.1086/671077

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 80

SP - 475

EP - 478

JO - Philosophy of Science

JF - Philosophy of Science

SN - 0031-8248

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 289118365