The impact of aerobic and resistance training intensity on markers of neuroplasticity in health and disease
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The impact of aerobic and resistance training intensity on markers of neuroplasticity in health and disease. / Hortobágyi, Tibor; Vetrovsky, Tomas; Balbim, Guilherme Moraes; Sorte Silva, Nárlon Cássio Boa; Manca, Andrea; Deriu, Franca; Kolmos, Mia; Kruuse, Christina; Liu-Ambrose, Teresa; Radák, Zsolt; Váczi, Márk; Johansson, Hanna; dos Santos, Paulo Cezar Rocha; Franzén, Erika; Granacher, Urs.
I: Ageing Research Reviews, Bind 80, 101698, 2022.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of aerobic and resistance training intensity on markers of neuroplasticity in health and disease
AU - Hortobágyi, Tibor
AU - Vetrovsky, Tomas
AU - Balbim, Guilherme Moraes
AU - Sorte Silva, Nárlon Cássio Boa
AU - Manca, Andrea
AU - Deriu, Franca
AU - Kolmos, Mia
AU - Kruuse, Christina
AU - Liu-Ambrose, Teresa
AU - Radák, Zsolt
AU - Váczi, Márk
AU - Johansson, Hanna
AU - dos Santos, Paulo Cezar Rocha
AU - Franzén, Erika
AU - Granacher, Urs
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: To determine the effects of low- vs. high-intensity aerobic and resistance training on motor and cognitive function, brain activation, brain structure, and neurochemical markers of neuroplasticity and the association thereof in healthy young and older adults and in patients with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and stroke. Design: Systematic review and robust variance estimation meta-analysis with meta-regression. Data sources: Systematic search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases. Results: Fifty studies with 60 intervention arms and 2283 in-analyses participants were included. Due to the low number of studies, the three patient groups were combined and analyzed as a single group. Overall, low- (g=0.19, p = 0.024) and high-intensity exercise (g=0.40, p = 0.001) improved neuroplasticity. Exercise intensity scaled with neuroplasticity only in healthy young adults but not in healthy older adults or patient groups. Exercise-induced improvements in neuroplasticity were associated with changes in motor but not cognitive outcomes. Conclusion: Exercise intensity is an important variable to dose and individualize the exercise stimulus for healthy young individuals but not necessarily for healthy older adults and neurological patients. This conclusion warrants caution because studies are needed that directly compare the effects of low- vs. high-intensity exercise on neuroplasticity to determine if such changes are mechanistically and incrementally linked to improved cognition and motor function.
AB - Objective: To determine the effects of low- vs. high-intensity aerobic and resistance training on motor and cognitive function, brain activation, brain structure, and neurochemical markers of neuroplasticity and the association thereof in healthy young and older adults and in patients with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and stroke. Design: Systematic review and robust variance estimation meta-analysis with meta-regression. Data sources: Systematic search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases. Results: Fifty studies with 60 intervention arms and 2283 in-analyses participants were included. Due to the low number of studies, the three patient groups were combined and analyzed as a single group. Overall, low- (g=0.19, p = 0.024) and high-intensity exercise (g=0.40, p = 0.001) improved neuroplasticity. Exercise intensity scaled with neuroplasticity only in healthy young adults but not in healthy older adults or patient groups. Exercise-induced improvements in neuroplasticity were associated with changes in motor but not cognitive outcomes. Conclusion: Exercise intensity is an important variable to dose and individualize the exercise stimulus for healthy young individuals but not necessarily for healthy older adults and neurological patients. This conclusion warrants caution because studies are needed that directly compare the effects of low- vs. high-intensity exercise on neuroplasticity to determine if such changes are mechanistically and incrementally linked to improved cognition and motor function.
KW - Aging
KW - Cognition motor function
KW - Exercise
KW - Intensity Dose-response relationship
U2 - 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101698
DO - 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101698
M3 - Review
C2 - 35853549
AN - SCOPUS:85134714217
VL - 80
JO - Ageing Research Reviews
JF - Ageing Research Reviews
SN - 1568-1637
M1 - 101698
ER -
ID: 323988277