Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton: A Population-Based Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton : A Population-Based Study. / Ladegaard, Thea Hovgaard; Sørensen, Celine Lykke; Nielsen, Rasmus; Troelsen, Anders; Al-Mousawi, Dhergam Ahmed Ali; Bielefeldt, Rikke; Petersen, Michael Mørk; Sørensen, Michala Skovlund.

I: Cancers, Bind 14, Nr. 5, 1258, 2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ladegaard, TH, Sørensen, CL, Nielsen, R, Troelsen, A, Al-Mousawi, DAA, Bielefeldt, R, Petersen, MM & Sørensen, MS 2022, 'Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton: A Population-Based Study', Cancers, bind 14, nr. 5, 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051258

APA

Ladegaard, T. H., Sørensen, C. L., Nielsen, R., Troelsen, A., Al-Mousawi, D. A. A., Bielefeldt, R., Petersen, M. M., & Sørensen, M. S. (2022). Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton: A Population-Based Study. Cancers, 14(5), [1258]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051258

Vancouver

Ladegaard TH, Sørensen CL, Nielsen R, Troelsen A, Al-Mousawi DAA, Bielefeldt R o.a. Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton: A Population-Based Study. Cancers. 2022;14(5). 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051258

Author

Ladegaard, Thea Hovgaard ; Sørensen, Celine Lykke ; Nielsen, Rasmus ; Troelsen, Anders ; Al-Mousawi, Dhergam Ahmed Ali ; Bielefeldt, Rikke ; Petersen, Michael Mørk ; Sørensen, Michala Skovlund. / Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton : A Population-Based Study. I: Cancers. 2022 ; Bind 14, Nr. 5.

Bibtex

@article{dee83b07750b4867a8576a1e58baf254,
title = "Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton: A Population-Based Study",
abstract = "Background: Population-based studies of patients with bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton (aBM) requiring surgery for complete or impending fracture are rare. In this epidemiologically-based observational study we created a large population-based cohort of patients treated for aBM, aiming to: (1) monitor possible time-related changes of the incidence of surgical treatment of aBM-lesions, (2) examine differences in the population and care of patients treated at different treatment centers and (3) examine if findings from a previous pilot study regarding absence of a suitable biopsy of the lesions representing debut of cancer or a relapse has improved the awareness of aBM and hereby increased the focus on regular tumor biopsies and follow-up imaging of cancer patients. Methods: We examined a population-based cohort consisting of all patients treated for aBM 2014–2019. Procedures were performed at five secondary surgical centers (SSC) or one tertiary referral Musculoskeletal Tumor Center (MTC). Patients were followed until end of study (30 September 2021) or death. No patients were lost to follow-up. Results: Four-hundred-fifty-seven patients (493 primary aBM-lesions, 482 procedures) were included. Annual incidence of aBM-surgery was 46 aBM-lesions/million. MTC-patients had a significant better preoperative status than SSC-patients considering factors known for survival. Patients with complete fracture experienced longer surgical delay when treated at MTC compared to SSC: 4 (1–9) and 1 (1–3) days (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall survival for the entire cohort was 37% and 11% at 1 and 5 years (MTC and SSC 1 and 5 year respectively: 44% and 15% vs. 29% and 5%, p < 0.001). In patients with debut or relapse of cancer, 8% and 9% had insufficient biopsies, and 21% and 12% had no biopsy, respectively. Comparison showed no change over time. Conclusions: The current study highlights the low awareness on treating aBM at SSC and emphasizes the importance of caution in interpretation of studies not representing an entire population, thus introducing selection bias.",
keywords = "Appendicular skeleton, Biopsy, Cancer, Extremities, Metastatic bone disease, Population-based, Surgery",
author = "Ladegaard, {Thea Hovgaard} and S{\o}rensen, {Celine Lykke} and Rasmus Nielsen and Anders Troelsen and Al-Mousawi, {Dhergam Ahmed Ali} and Rikke Bielefeldt and Petersen, {Michael M{\o}rk} and S{\o}rensen, {Michala Skovlund}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.3390/cancers14051258",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Cancers",
issn = "2072-6694",
publisher = "M D P I AG",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease in the Appendicular Skeleton

T2 - A Population-Based Study

AU - Ladegaard, Thea Hovgaard

AU - Sørensen, Celine Lykke

AU - Nielsen, Rasmus

AU - Troelsen, Anders

AU - Al-Mousawi, Dhergam Ahmed Ali

AU - Bielefeldt, Rikke

AU - Petersen, Michael Mørk

AU - Sørensen, Michala Skovlund

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background: Population-based studies of patients with bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton (aBM) requiring surgery for complete or impending fracture are rare. In this epidemiologically-based observational study we created a large population-based cohort of patients treated for aBM, aiming to: (1) monitor possible time-related changes of the incidence of surgical treatment of aBM-lesions, (2) examine differences in the population and care of patients treated at different treatment centers and (3) examine if findings from a previous pilot study regarding absence of a suitable biopsy of the lesions representing debut of cancer or a relapse has improved the awareness of aBM and hereby increased the focus on regular tumor biopsies and follow-up imaging of cancer patients. Methods: We examined a population-based cohort consisting of all patients treated for aBM 2014–2019. Procedures were performed at five secondary surgical centers (SSC) or one tertiary referral Musculoskeletal Tumor Center (MTC). Patients were followed until end of study (30 September 2021) or death. No patients were lost to follow-up. Results: Four-hundred-fifty-seven patients (493 primary aBM-lesions, 482 procedures) were included. Annual incidence of aBM-surgery was 46 aBM-lesions/million. MTC-patients had a significant better preoperative status than SSC-patients considering factors known for survival. Patients with complete fracture experienced longer surgical delay when treated at MTC compared to SSC: 4 (1–9) and 1 (1–3) days (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall survival for the entire cohort was 37% and 11% at 1 and 5 years (MTC and SSC 1 and 5 year respectively: 44% and 15% vs. 29% and 5%, p < 0.001). In patients with debut or relapse of cancer, 8% and 9% had insufficient biopsies, and 21% and 12% had no biopsy, respectively. Comparison showed no change over time. Conclusions: The current study highlights the low awareness on treating aBM at SSC and emphasizes the importance of caution in interpretation of studies not representing an entire population, thus introducing selection bias.

AB - Background: Population-based studies of patients with bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton (aBM) requiring surgery for complete or impending fracture are rare. In this epidemiologically-based observational study we created a large population-based cohort of patients treated for aBM, aiming to: (1) monitor possible time-related changes of the incidence of surgical treatment of aBM-lesions, (2) examine differences in the population and care of patients treated at different treatment centers and (3) examine if findings from a previous pilot study regarding absence of a suitable biopsy of the lesions representing debut of cancer or a relapse has improved the awareness of aBM and hereby increased the focus on regular tumor biopsies and follow-up imaging of cancer patients. Methods: We examined a population-based cohort consisting of all patients treated for aBM 2014–2019. Procedures were performed at five secondary surgical centers (SSC) or one tertiary referral Musculoskeletal Tumor Center (MTC). Patients were followed until end of study (30 September 2021) or death. No patients were lost to follow-up. Results: Four-hundred-fifty-seven patients (493 primary aBM-lesions, 482 procedures) were included. Annual incidence of aBM-surgery was 46 aBM-lesions/million. MTC-patients had a significant better preoperative status than SSC-patients considering factors known for survival. Patients with complete fracture experienced longer surgical delay when treated at MTC compared to SSC: 4 (1–9) and 1 (1–3) days (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall survival for the entire cohort was 37% and 11% at 1 and 5 years (MTC and SSC 1 and 5 year respectively: 44% and 15% vs. 29% and 5%, p < 0.001). In patients with debut or relapse of cancer, 8% and 9% had insufficient biopsies, and 21% and 12% had no biopsy, respectively. Comparison showed no change over time. Conclusions: The current study highlights the low awareness on treating aBM at SSC and emphasizes the importance of caution in interpretation of studies not representing an entire population, thus introducing selection bias.

KW - Appendicular skeleton

KW - Biopsy

KW - Cancer

KW - Extremities

KW - Metastatic bone disease

KW - Population-based

KW - Surgery

U2 - 10.3390/cancers14051258

DO - 10.3390/cancers14051258

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35267566

AN - SCOPUS:85125934018

VL - 14

JO - Cancers

JF - Cancers

SN - 2072-6694

IS - 5

M1 - 1258

ER -

ID: 314281324