Supervision of M.Sc. theses using the writing of a scientific article as a framework to increase efficiency and quality of research outcomes
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Konferenceartikel › Forskning
Standard
Supervision of M.Sc. theses using the writing of a scientific article as a framework to increase efficiency and quality of research outcomes. / Ortiz-Catalan, Max; Middleton, Alexandra; Gustafsson, Magnus.
I: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS, 2019, s. 1436-1439.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Konferenceartikel › Forskning
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Supervision of M.Sc. theses using the writing of a scientific article as a framework to increase efficiency and quality of research outcomes
AU - Ortiz-Catalan, Max
AU - Middleton, Alexandra
AU - Gustafsson, Magnus
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The number of published peer-reviewed research articles has increased exponentially in the past decades, as has the degree of competitiveness in scientific publishing. Publication of scientific articles remains the gold standard for measuring research quality. In this context, quality is understood as to how rigorously the scientific method was applied. However, a critical disconnect exists between the continuous channel of projects fed to students by research laboratories, and the scientific quality of outcomes these students produce. Here, we present a process for the supervision of M.Sc. thesis projects conducted in research laboratories with the objective to increase productivity and quality. It is based on an iterative model of writing a scientific article naturally following the scientific method. This approach intends to maximize learning and development for the student, as well as productivity for the research laboratory by facilitating the publication of a peer-reviewed scientific article out of the thesis work.
AB - The number of published peer-reviewed research articles has increased exponentially in the past decades, as has the degree of competitiveness in scientific publishing. Publication of scientific articles remains the gold standard for measuring research quality. In this context, quality is understood as to how rigorously the scientific method was applied. However, a critical disconnect exists between the continuous channel of projects fed to students by research laboratories, and the scientific quality of outcomes these students produce. Here, we present a process for the supervision of M.Sc. thesis projects conducted in research laboratories with the objective to increase productivity and quality. It is based on an iterative model of writing a scientific article naturally following the scientific method. This approach intends to maximize learning and development for the student, as well as productivity for the research laboratory by facilitating the publication of a peer-reviewed scientific article out of the thesis work.
U2 - 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856364
DO - 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856364
M3 - Conference article
C2 - 31946163
AN - SCOPUS:85077850909
SP - 1436
EP - 1439
JO - Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings
JF - Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings
SN - 0589-1019
T2 - 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2019
Y2 - 23 July 2019 through 27 July 2019
ER -
ID: 371019027