Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia : a descriptive study on agreement. / Kokotovic, D; Gögenur, I; Helgstrand, F.

I: Hernia, Bind 21, Nr. 2, 2017, s. 271-278.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kokotovic, D, Gögenur, I & Helgstrand, F 2017, 'Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement', Hernia, bind 21, nr. 2, s. 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1562-y

APA

Kokotovic, D., Gögenur, I., & Helgstrand, F. (2017). Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement. Hernia, 21(2), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1562-y

Vancouver

Kokotovic D, Gögenur I, Helgstrand F. Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement. Hernia. 2017;21(2):271-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1562-y

Author

Kokotovic, D ; Gögenur, I ; Helgstrand, F. / Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia : a descriptive study on agreement. I: Hernia. 2017 ; Bind 21, Nr. 2. s. 271-278.

Bibtex

@article{dc029a46e7e04e09b13ff7b79a1ed743,
title = "Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Benign elective procedures give rise to heterogeneity in indication for surgery and surgical technique among specialized surgeons in a variety of surgical fields. The objective was to analyze the extent of agreement in surgical management among expert hernia surgeons when evaluating the same patient in a standardized setting.METHODS: Five Danish hernia experts answered questions concerning indication for surgery and surgical technique for 25 video recorded real-life clinical cases. The experts evaluated the patients by answering a standardized questionnaire.RESULTS: All surgeons were experienced in incisional hernia repair with a median of 253 repairs (range 164-450 repairs). Perfect overall agreement among all the experts in indication, operation type, component separation, mesh fixation and mesh position was found in only five cases (20%). Agreement in indication for surgery was present in 14 cases (56%). The most common reason for not performing surgery was due to comorbidities. Agreement in operation type (open vs. laparoscopic) was present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh fixation (absorbable tacks/non-absorbable tacks/suture/other) method was also present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh position (onlay, sublay or intraperitoneal) was found in 40% of cases. The highest overall agreement among the surgeons was observed with regard to whether patients needed component separation (yes/no), 21 cases, (84%).CONCLUSIONS: In a standardized setting, agreement in choice of treatment strategy for patients with incisional hernias was very low among experienced surgeons. A standardization of surgical decision making is desirable to develop new interventions and improve clinical outcomes.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Comorbidity, Contraindications, Decision Making, Elective Surgical Procedures, Female, Hernia, Ventral/surgery, Herniorrhaphy/methods, Humans, Incisional Hernia/surgery, Laparoscopy, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Surgical Mesh, Surveys and Questionnaires",
author = "D Kokotovic and I G{\"o}genur and F Helgstrand",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s10029-016-1562-y",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "271--278",
journal = "Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery",
issn = "1265-4906",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag France",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia

T2 - a descriptive study on agreement

AU - Kokotovic, D

AU - Gögenur, I

AU - Helgstrand, F

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - PURPOSE: Benign elective procedures give rise to heterogeneity in indication for surgery and surgical technique among specialized surgeons in a variety of surgical fields. The objective was to analyze the extent of agreement in surgical management among expert hernia surgeons when evaluating the same patient in a standardized setting.METHODS: Five Danish hernia experts answered questions concerning indication for surgery and surgical technique for 25 video recorded real-life clinical cases. The experts evaluated the patients by answering a standardized questionnaire.RESULTS: All surgeons were experienced in incisional hernia repair with a median of 253 repairs (range 164-450 repairs). Perfect overall agreement among all the experts in indication, operation type, component separation, mesh fixation and mesh position was found in only five cases (20%). Agreement in indication for surgery was present in 14 cases (56%). The most common reason for not performing surgery was due to comorbidities. Agreement in operation type (open vs. laparoscopic) was present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh fixation (absorbable tacks/non-absorbable tacks/suture/other) method was also present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh position (onlay, sublay or intraperitoneal) was found in 40% of cases. The highest overall agreement among the surgeons was observed with regard to whether patients needed component separation (yes/no), 21 cases, (84%).CONCLUSIONS: In a standardized setting, agreement in choice of treatment strategy for patients with incisional hernias was very low among experienced surgeons. A standardization of surgical decision making is desirable to develop new interventions and improve clinical outcomes.

AB - PURPOSE: Benign elective procedures give rise to heterogeneity in indication for surgery and surgical technique among specialized surgeons in a variety of surgical fields. The objective was to analyze the extent of agreement in surgical management among expert hernia surgeons when evaluating the same patient in a standardized setting.METHODS: Five Danish hernia experts answered questions concerning indication for surgery and surgical technique for 25 video recorded real-life clinical cases. The experts evaluated the patients by answering a standardized questionnaire.RESULTS: All surgeons were experienced in incisional hernia repair with a median of 253 repairs (range 164-450 repairs). Perfect overall agreement among all the experts in indication, operation type, component separation, mesh fixation and mesh position was found in only five cases (20%). Agreement in indication for surgery was present in 14 cases (56%). The most common reason for not performing surgery was due to comorbidities. Agreement in operation type (open vs. laparoscopic) was present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh fixation (absorbable tacks/non-absorbable tacks/suture/other) method was also present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh position (onlay, sublay or intraperitoneal) was found in 40% of cases. The highest overall agreement among the surgeons was observed with regard to whether patients needed component separation (yes/no), 21 cases, (84%).CONCLUSIONS: In a standardized setting, agreement in choice of treatment strategy for patients with incisional hernias was very low among experienced surgeons. A standardization of surgical decision making is desirable to develop new interventions and improve clinical outcomes.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Contraindications

KW - Decision Making

KW - Elective Surgical Procedures

KW - Female

KW - Hernia, Ventral/surgery

KW - Herniorrhaphy/methods

KW - Humans

KW - Incisional Hernia/surgery

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Recurrence

KW - Surgical Mesh

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

U2 - 10.1007/s10029-016-1562-y

DO - 10.1007/s10029-016-1562-y

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27915385

VL - 21

SP - 271

EP - 278

JO - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

JF - Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery

SN - 1265-4906

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 195513163